NASA Administrator Orders Study of Heavy Lift Alternatives

by Nancy Atkinson on October 21, 2009

Jupiter 110 and 232.  From Directlauncher.com

Jupiter 110 and 232. From Directlauncher.com


NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden has asked for an evaluation of alternative heavy lift rockets, including DIRECT’s Jupiter launch vehicle. The evaluation is a “top priority,” according to NASASpaceflight.com, and a special team from the Marshall Space Flight Center has been commissioned to conduct the study, with the directive to have a report ready by the end of November. Looking at alternatives to the Constellation program is an apparent reaction to the final Augustine Commission report, which will be made public on Thursday.

Shuttle Derived Heavy lift concept. Credit: NASASpaceflight.com

Shuttle Derived Heavy lift concept. Credit: NASASpaceflight.com


The other heavy lift vehicle also to be looked at is the Shuttle Derived Heavy Lift Launch Vehicle, which is a shuttle-based concept with a cargo carrier side mounted to the current design of the external tank. The concept is capable of launching 80mt (metric tons) into Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and around 54mt to the moon.

However sources at NASASpaceflight.com note that the DIRECT team’s Jupiter launch system has dominated early discussions at the Special Team meetings.

Bolden also recently hinted that commercial space companies could play a crucial role in NASA’s future. “Some of the most exciting companies in America today go by the names of SpaceX, Blue Origin, Armadillo Aerospace, Virgin Galactic, Xcor, Bigelow Aerospace, Masten, Flag Suit, and Ad Astra,” Bolden said in a speech at the National Association of Investment Companies. “Today, we at NASA are devising ways to work with these companies and others who will come. I urge you, and all other investors, to take notice. Space may someday soon become the new thing in investing.”

For more information on the Direct project, see our previous in-depth article here, or the DirectLauncher website.

Source: NASASpaceflight.com

Nancy Atkinson is Universe Today's Senior Editor. She also is the host of the NASA Lunar Science Institute podcast and works with the Astronomy Cast and 365 Days of Astronomy podcasts. Nancy is also a NASA/JPL Solar System Ambassador.

  • ND

    “I really think they ought to have a jack of all trades type rocket that can do everything “within reason” we want it to do.”

    Isn’t this how we ended up with the current space shuttle to begin with? But then again there is a common strong urge to do this. Even the soviets built a shuttle.

  • Vanamonde

    SRB’s, again. Man, I wish we could get back to burning hydrogen instead of aluminum. The impact of this is not that much on the world wide scheme of things but if we ramp up to more launches and more traffic, it will become so much more important to pollute less.

    And I would like to see bigger, better space station and then a moon base that supports a mass driver….okay, you read me talk of O’Neal’s plans, right?? It will take a lot of heavy lifting and a world wide effort.

  • RUF

    We need a heavy lifter even if we don’t go to the Moon. Other destinations (other than LEO) will require it.

Previous post:

Next post: