Look Into the Cat’s Eye…

by Tammy Plotner on February 8, 2009

NGC 6543 Parallel - Jukka Metsavainio

NGC 6543 Parallel - Jukka Metsavainio

Are you ready for more stereo vision? This haunting Hubble Telescope image has been visualized for dimension by the one and only Jukka Metsavainio and gives us a look at one of the most complex planetary nebulae ever photographed. Inside NGC 6543 – nicknamed the “Cat’s Eye Nebula” – the Hubble has revealed delicate structures including concentric gas shells, jets of high-speed gas, and unusual shock-induced knots of gas… and thanks to Jukka’s “magic vision” we’re able to take a look into the Cat’s Eye as it might appear in dimension. Step inside and let’s learn more…

When Jukka produces an image, it’s more than just a clever Photoshop “trick”. Hours of study must go into each image, because the light is acting differently in each part of the nebula. To make these images work correctly, Jukka must understand which stars are causing the ionization, which stars are nearer and further from our point of perspective and so on. Each type of image is totally unique and what makes dimension work for a reflection nebula won’t work for an emission nebula. Says Jukka; “To be able to make those stereo pairs, one have to learn lots of things about the targets, and beside that, study the actual image more deeply than usual. Star distances must be measured by the size and the color. For example, stars with yellowish hue must be in or behind the nebulosity, white/blue ones are front of it.”

Because dimension will appear reversed by the method you choose to use to view these images, Jukka makes two versions. The first you see at the top of the page is parallel vision – where you relax your eyes and when you are a certain distance from the monitor screen the two images will merge into one to produce a 3D version. The second – which appears below – is crossed vision. This is for those who have better success crossing their eyes to form a third, central image where the dimensional effect occurs. So, now that you understand the images are a visualization and how they are created, let’s take a parallel look…

NGC 6543 Cross - Jukka Metsavainio

NGC 6543 Cross - Jukka Metsavainio


And now it’s my turn to add a little “magic” to what you see.

Estimated to be 1,000 years old, the Cat’s Eye is a portrait of a dying star – and quite possibly an unresolved double-star system. According to research, the dynamical effects of two stars orbiting one could very well be the cause of the complicated and intricate structures revealed here – structures normally not seen in planetary nebulae. When NGC 6543 was first observed spectroscopically, it showed the presence of emission lines, an indicator of multiple stars, but also an indictor of diffuse gas clouds.

As studies progressed, more hypothesis about the NGC 6543′s structure began to emerge. Perhaps a fast stellar wind from the central star created the elongated shell… It could be the companion star is emitting high-speed jets of gas that lie at right angles to the equatorial ring… Maybe the stellar wind has carved out the inner structure of the nebula are there are more than one there? Says L.F. Miranda; “The velocity field of NGC 6543 shows the existence of two concentric ellipsoidal shells in the nebula. The two shells likely represent the inner and outer surface layers of a geometrically ‘Thick Ellipsoid’ (TE) which constitutes the basic structure of NGC 6543.”

Even more research ensued, and with it came the twin jet theory and the ejection of materials spaced over intervals of time – like cosmic smoke rings being puffed off at perfect intervals. According to Bruce Balik; “Hubble archival images of NGC 6543 reveal a series of at least nine regularly spaced concentric circular rings that surround the famous nebular core, known as the Cat’s Eye Nebula. The rings are almost certainly spherical bubbles of periodic isotropic nuclear mass pulsations that preceded the formation of the core. Their ejection period is consistent with a suggestion that quasi-periodic shells are launched every few hundred years in dust-forming asymptotic giant branch (AGB) winds but not consonant with the predictions of extant models of core thermal pulses (~105 yr) and surface pulsations (~10 yr).”

To be sure, there are simply a lot of things that we don’t know or understand about the Cat’s Eye Nebula just yet. It is possible that magnetic activity somewhat similar to our own Sun’s sunspot cycle, could be at work here. Says Dr. Balick; “What do the rings imply? Since they’re larger than the bright cores of the nebulae that they surround, the rings are almost certainly material ejected episodically before the main and bright core of the nebula formed. This means that the start that ejected the nebulae first quivered and shivered and made these concentric rings. Then something big happened, and the density and mechanism for ejecting the mass changed abruptly. This is when the core of the nebula was formed, typically between 1000 and 2000 years ago. The rhythmic ringing of a dying star is expected as the last of its nuclear fuel is suddenly triggered into ignition by the increasing crush of gravity — much like the juice ejected by squeezing an orange with increasing force. Each expulsion of juice temporarily relieves the internal pressure inside the orange. Similarly, each ejection of mass temporarily stops the combustion of the final dregs of the star’s remaining fuel. Why should the pattern of ejection mass change so radically and strongly? We can only conjecture. Its possible that an orbiting star or giant planet falls onto the dying star. It hits the surface with such force that its atoms ignite in a large conflagration. Somehow, the burst of heat drives the remnants of the dying star into space in fantastic patterns.”

And we looked right into its eye…

My many thanks once again to Jukka Metsavainio of Northern Galactic for his artistry and we look forward to the next installment!

  • Sofia

    I’m cleaning my glasses…

  • http://www.cosmotions.com Thad

    I really enjoy this series of stunning stereo images by Jukka Metsavainio. Please keep ‘em comin’ Tammy!

  • http://astronomi.blogg.se Assi

    Nice!

  • Astrofiend

    Man these things rock my socks.

  • robbi

    Beautiful!!!!!!

  • http://freiddy.blogspot.com Freiddie

    I really like these kind of stereo images than the “blue-red” kinds.

  • http://freiddy.blogspot.com Freiddie

    Correction: I really like these kind of stereo images *more* than the “blue-red” kinds.

  • Salacious B. Crumb

    The axis of the bipolar flow of the planetary nebula doesn’t look quite right to me. It doesn’t seem to match the velocity measures made of various features within the nebulosity, nor the calculated about 32 degrees to the line of sight. With blunt criticism, Jukka Metsavainio might just like to check a few paper on the morphology of planetary nebula (G.Pascoli work of 1999 comes to mind.), to make sure the stereo images show what has already been derived.
    Nice pic though.

  • http://oilismastery.blogspot.com/ OilIsMastery

    You can really see the magnetic field lines quite vividly.

    Only electricity can generate magnetic fields.

  • Chris

    I know how to shift my focus, but I’m having trouble getting them to come together. They seem too far apart to begin with, or else my eyes don’t have enough range of motion. Is anyone else having this problem? Any suggestions?

  • Chip

    @ Chris: The second picture/pair is easier. You just have to cross your eyes on that one until the two images line up, then just focus them.

    Which makes me wonder why images like these in general are not set to “cross-eyed” 3D instead of “make your eyes spread apart” 3D.
    Trying to get your eyes to “relax” or look at some imagined point far beyond what you are actually looking at until your eyes line up with the images is pretty difficult for most people I know.
    Crossing your eyes is far easier and faster for everyone.

  • http://henrysolberg.com Henry Solberg

    But it hurts way more to cross your eyes. I find looking further out greatly preferable.

    If you can’t do it, my (completely unfounded) advice is to simply let your eyes go unfocused. Since you are looking at a computer screen, “default” will definitely be further out. Having “learned” the muscles to use, you can then continue that motion as neccecary.

  • Michael Booth

    It’s amazing to think that these SN remnants are cosmically speaking just like a puff of smoke after an explosion.
    The photo is just great!

  • Vernon

    Once again, awesome. I have never seen the Cat’s Eye in that much detail, the rings really come out and are very impressive.

    With all my practice on the “Magic Eye” books, I have no problem crossing my eyes to make the third image appear. Took me all of three seconds to get the image.

    Please, please, keep it up, I would even suggest a whole book of these images, if possible with all the copyright rules.

    Thanks. Keep up the good work.

  • Carl J.

    I’ve had at least 30 different people send me an email about the Cat’s Eye nebula, telling me that NASA oficially describes this nebula as the “EYE OF GOD”. Even though I do attend church on Sunday….. I think it’s absurd that all these conservative Neo-Con’s believe NASA oficially refers to NGC6543 as the Eye Of God.

  • Frank P.

    Thank you much for the stereo images – they’re great. I convert some of them into (red/blue glasses) 3D images for my family that can’t cross their eyes to focus on the dual images.
    Keep it up!

  • Rob

    Beautiful! Seeing this famous image in 3D for the first time gave me a new perspective on SNRs. I had previously imagined them in 3D, but this is, of course, not the same as “seeing” them in 3D. I’d like to see the object renamed the “Sea Shell Nebula”.

  • HeadAroundU

    Doesn’t work for me and I don’t want to f*ck up my eyes. I gotta read a lot today.

    Why don’t you guys make a 3D video?

  • gudenboink

    Speaking of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field picture – the last time I saw it profiled on the Science Channel they said it was a Million seconds of exposure time (I think) and talked about trying to get another Super Ultra Deep exposure of a million more or twice as long.
    (I HOPE! How COOL would THAT BE???)

    Has anyone heard anything about another extremely long or Super-Duper-Ultra-Ultra Deep Field?? The galaxies that were showing up in the UDF were fascinating because they were such goofy shapes AND were getting rather thinly spaced.

    I’m wondering if they would see much of anything else at twice the exposure – that would be REALLY close if not right up to the Big Bang – wouldn’t it?

  • kymmie_cat

    What wonderful work by Jukka Metsavainio, a truly awesome pic. But only 1,000 years old … that seems like almost nothing in stellar time. A “dying” baby star?

Previous post:

Next post: