What on earth are you banging on about? Where in any of the astronomical literature does anyone claim the asteroids in the solar system are the left-overs from the galaxy's formation? And magnetic reconnection to what?
Saturn etc becoming stars? Have you ever read a book on astronomy?
Where do these fools come from?

2009 FK – intruder
Approximate diameter: 7 meters (H=28.349)
Closest Earth approach: 0.97 LD at 2314 UTC yesterday
Inside Earth-Moon system: 1954 UTC yesterday until 0235 UTC today
Inside Earth's Hill sphere: 17 to 22 March
Inside ten LD of Earth: 13 to 26 March
Closest Moon approach: 0.42 LD at 1128 UTC today
Inside one LD of Moon: 2113 UTC yesterday until 0134 UTC tomorrow
Data based on: JPL SSD orbit solution #2 downloaded yesterday
based on 36 observations spanning 2 days
Optical observation: observed from 6 locations during 1.9157 days
discovered at 0701 UTC on 17 March by the Catalina Sky Survey
last observed at 0459 UTC yesterday by Calar Alto Obs.

The result? Peace and quiet on God' green Earth. (Yawn)

Yes. Telescopes.

But there would have to be a number of them, in various locations, dedicated to nothing but searches for Near Earth Objects. The answer, as is often the case, finding the money for such an ongoing program.

In other words, it probably would mean increasing Spaceguard's budget, allowing them more dedicated tools to work with…

@OillsMastery
They allready do disturb it, charged or not.

If these asteroids have anything in common it could be that we are getting closer to the galaxy's magnetic reconnection and from an idea of mine could posses many large sized asteroids left over from SGR.A creating this galaxy. I know that is conjecture but remember Cassini found that the rings of Saturn were older nearer to the planet then the rings further away, which supports this idea how matter is created on the magnetic reconnection of a stars magnetic field. The stronger the magnetic field becomes, over time, the further matter away is then created. This idea explains why all the planets in this solar system began forming on the sun's magnetic reconnection when the sun was a giant planet itself, first creating rings then the rings collecting together to form planets. Exactly what is being observed around the outer planets, Saturn, Jupiter, Uranus, and Neptune. When these planets become stars, if the gravity increases from accreation, the moons will then be called planets.

Aahhhh! Begs the question does not mean "raises the question"!!

"Begging the question is a logical fallacy in which the proposition to be proved is assumed implicitly or explicitly in one of the premises." -wikipedia

Example: "Why am I the boss? It's because I call the shots around here."

Begging the question means using circular logic by using proof that has the same inherent question as the original question.

Sorry, pet peeve.

But "many rivers small", asteroids and comets and most of all ofc the planets do gradually alter eachothers orbits, and sometimes the altered object gets to close to a larger object (planet or larger asteroid) and gets a drastically different orbit, even flung into the sun or flung out of the solarsystem.

"No – it begs the question, how many have we missed in the past because we were not looking?"

::shouting at cold, uncaring Internet/universe::

It raises these questions, it doesn't beg them!

::cries::

I assume that by LD you mean "lunar distance" and not "light day" since 1.2 light days would not be close enough to bother mentioning.

A colleague and I will try to feature live imaging sessions on Slooh, capturing it very close proximity to several nice galaxies including M81 and M82. We'll also run a free internet radio stream for non-members to be able to listen to the action.

One has to wonder, are we simply better able to detect these objects, or are there really more of them lately. I've noticed in the past couple of years of following NEOs that we seem to get spurts like this at least a couple of times of years, so my question is, are they associated with each other, possibly remnants of distant or even recent main belt collisions.

Are we only relying on optical methods of finding these asteroids?