<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Viewing Earth as an Extra-Solar Planet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:17:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/comment-page-2/#comment-49995</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 01:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23560#comment-49995</guid>
		<description>Not so much time ago, some scientist (sorry, I don&#039;t remember who and where) said, that the electro-magnetic emissions from radio and TV diffuse completely into the interstellar noise in a distance of a small number of light years. If this is true – and it&#039;s plausible for me – any civilization in a distance of, say, 60 to 100 light years wouldn&#039;t know about us through these emissions. If there is no signal, then, even by using a very, very advanced technique, &quot;they&quot; cannot recognize it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so much time ago, some scientist (sorry, I don&#039;t remember who and where) said, that the electro-magnetic emissions from radio and TV diffuse completely into the interstellar noise in a distance of a small number of light years. If this is true – and it&#039;s plausible for me – any civilization in a distance of, say, 60 to 100 light years wouldn&#039;t know about us through these emissions. If there is no signal, then, even by using a very, very advanced technique, &#034;they&#034; cannot recognize it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill L.</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/comment-page-2/#comment-49956</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23560#comment-49956</guid>
		<description>@ damian

Actually, yes.  Well, no. Kind of.

Absolute zero is impossible to achieve, but supercooling telescopes (especially space telescopes) is certainly not a new idea.

For instance, most infrared telescopes have to be kept extraordinarily cool, as heat generated by the telescope itself would overpower any observations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ damian</p>
<p>Actually, yes.  Well, no. Kind of.</p>
<p>Absolute zero is impossible to achieve, but supercooling telescopes (especially space telescopes) is certainly not a new idea.</p>
<p>For instance, most infrared telescopes have to be kept extraordinarily cool, as heat generated by the telescope itself would overpower any observations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Beaton</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/comment-page-2/#comment-49946</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Beaton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23560#comment-49946</guid>
		<description>I think
 We should search for life on Earth from Orbit.
We should figure out what to look for,- that says, the planet has possible life on it.
  Maybe the &#039;blue&#039; color- maybe the clear skies here and clouds there. Is there Oxygen
Is there land mass? Also is the planetary temperature ideal for life?
  For instance is there life on &#039;Neptune&#039;?
Neptune is &#039;blue&#039;..There might be fish
on neptune, though the gravity would make
them very strong fish...

   Anyway, that&#039;s my amateurish opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think<br />
 We should search for life on Earth from Orbit.<br />
We should figure out what to look for,- that says, the planet has possible life on it.<br />
  Maybe the &#039;blue&#039; color- maybe the clear skies here and clouds there. Is there Oxygen<br />
Is there land mass? Also is the planetary temperature ideal for life?<br />
  For instance is there life on &#039;Neptune&#039;?<br />
Neptune is &#039;blue&#039;..There might be fish<br />
on neptune, though the gravity would make<br />
them very strong fish&#8230;</p>
<p>   Anyway, that&#039;s my amateurish opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard2</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-49945</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23560#comment-49945</guid>
		<description>Stop worrying about an alien invasion.

Our atmosphere with 20% poisonous gas is not a very hospitable place unless your species evolved here.

Biological entities are very specific to their environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop worrying about an alien invasion.</p>
<p>Our atmosphere with 20% poisonous gas is not a very hospitable place unless your species evolved here.</p>
<p>Biological entities are very specific to their environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayti</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-49941</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23560#comment-49941</guid>
		<description>Alien plants yes, but perhaps you&#039;d see a similar, analogous effect at other wave lengths indicating the presence of analogous plants.

If a planet and it&#039;s life evolved in the presence of a star of a different color than our own then, looking for a shift in the &quot;red edge&quot; would seem a reasonable line of inquiry. To me at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alien plants yes, but perhaps you&#039;d see a similar, analogous effect at other wave lengths indicating the presence of analogous plants.</p>
<p>If a planet and it&#039;s life evolved in the presence of a star of a different color than our own then, looking for a shift in the &#034;red edge&#034; would seem a reasonable line of inquiry. To me at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeckyWS</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-49915</link>
		<dc:creator>BeckyWS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23560#comment-49915</guid>
		<description>Ha ha, Dark Gnat got there before me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha, Dark Gnat got there before me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeckyWS</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-49914</link>
		<dc:creator>BeckyWS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23560#comment-49914</guid>
		<description>This is very interesting, but it assumes that extra-solar &#039;vegetation&#039;- by which we mean what, non-intelligent static life?- will use a system of energy gathering involving chlorophyll, or at the least, some system where visible light is absorbed but near-infrared is reflected. 
This seems a very narrow view for life signatures to me- how likely is it that something using this precise system will have evolved elsewhere? What about other energy sources like infrared, x-ray or even thermal energy being exploited? How would we look for signatures like that? 
I hate to quote Donald Rumsfeld, but there are the known unknowns like looking for a red edge, but there are the unknown unknowns too... we might declare the galaxy lifeless because we haven&#039;t found an earth clone, when really we haven&#039;t been imaginative enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very interesting, but it assumes that extra-solar &#039;vegetation&#039;- by which we mean what, non-intelligent static life?- will use a system of energy gathering involving chlorophyll, or at the least, some system where visible light is absorbed but near-infrared is reflected.<br />
This seems a very narrow view for life signatures to me- how likely is it that something using this precise system will have evolved elsewhere? What about other energy sources like infrared, x-ray or even thermal energy being exploited? How would we look for signatures like that?<br />
I hate to quote Donald Rumsfeld, but there are the known unknowns like looking for a red edge, but there are the unknown unknowns too&#8230; we might declare the galaxy lifeless because we haven&#039;t found an earth clone, when really we haven&#039;t been imaginative enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dark Gnat</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-49913</link>
		<dc:creator>Dark Gnat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23560#comment-49913</guid>
		<description>All of this assumes that alien vegetation is like Earths.  

Alien plants (if you could even call them plants) may not use chlorophyl or other photosynthesising chemicals.  They may not even use visible light as an energy source.

I wonder if it would be possible to predict and find a reflectivity drop in other wavelengths.

We would also have to take into account the atmosphere, cloud cover and how that might affect the results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of this assumes that alien vegetation is like Earths.  </p>
<p>Alien plants (if you could even call them plants) may not use chlorophyl or other photosynthesising chemicals.  They may not even use visible light as an energy source.</p>
<p>I wonder if it would be possible to predict and find a reflectivity drop in other wavelengths.</p>
<p>We would also have to take into account the atmosphere, cloud cover and how that might affect the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mang</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-49912</link>
		<dc:creator>Mang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23560#comment-49912</guid>
		<description>@Neil - I&#039;d always thought it would be difficult given that (1) reflected light from the Earth delivers far more energy than our most powerful transmitters, (2) inverse square law, (3) background noise.  The only way I thought it might happen is if the radio/TV was detected as background noise where there shouldn&#039;t be any.  Forget any idea of reconstructing a signal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Neil &#8211; I&#039;d always thought it would be difficult given that (1) reflected light from the Earth delivers far more energy than our most powerful transmitters, (2) inverse square law, (3) background noise.  The only way I thought it might happen is if the radio/TV was detected as background noise where there shouldn&#039;t be any.  Forget any idea of reconstructing a signal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-49910</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23560#comment-49910</guid>
		<description>Has anyone ever tried telescopes frozen to absolute zero? (the lens)

Would there be any advantage? Superconductivity in Telescopes?

Just musing. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone ever tried telescopes frozen to absolute zero? (the lens)</p>
<p>Would there be any advantage? Superconductivity in Telescopes?</p>
<p>Just musing. <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackBolt</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-49909</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackBolt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23560#comment-49909</guid>
		<description>Well, Mang, the &quot;decades&quot; equate to how many LY our radio waves have travelled, the latter supposedly having the speed of light and everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Mang, the &#034;decades&#034; equate to how many LY our radio waves have travelled, the latter supposedly having the speed of light and everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-49905</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23560#comment-49905</guid>
		<description>Radio signals would barely leave our solar system, forget them travelling to distant stars, its a myth!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radio signals would barely leave our solar system, forget them travelling to distant stars, its a myth!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mang</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-49903</link>
		<dc:creator>Mang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 12:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23560#comment-49903</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve been leaking radio, TV and other signals into space for decades.  Has anyone looked at what it would take to identify such signals from planets around stars 60-100 LY away?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#039;ve been leaking radio, TV and other signals into space for decades.  Has anyone looked at what it would take to identify such signals from planets around stars 60-100 LY away?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mang</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-49900</link>
		<dc:creator>Mang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23560#comment-49900</guid>
		<description>@trux - for exposures of this length a space telescope is needed otherwise there is the small problem of the Earth getting between you an your target for a good chunck of the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@trux &#8211; for exposures of this length a space telescope is needed otherwise there is the small problem of the Earth getting between you an your target for a good chunck of the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-49898</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23560#comment-49898</guid>
		<description>Tacitus,
I do agree completely its pointless to hide our emissions.  

If another species in our &quot;stellar neighborhood&quot; has seen our little neck of the woods and has any knowledge of our planet, lets just hope the Vogons don&#039;t wipe us out for a hyper space bypass :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tacitus,<br />
I do agree completely its pointless to hide our emissions.  </p>
<p>If another species in our &#034;stellar neighborhood&#034; has seen our little neck of the woods and has any knowledge of our planet, lets just hope the Vogons don&#039;t wipe us out for a hyper space bypass <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fsm</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-49896</link>
		<dc:creator>fsm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23560#comment-49896</guid>
		<description>Nice piece, but :
&quot;The Galileo probe found strong for this evidence in Earth 1990&quot; 
A little re-editing needed, maybe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice piece, but :<br />
&#034;The Galileo probe found strong for this evidence in Earth 1990&#034;<br />
A little re-editing needed, maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tacitus</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-49892</link>
		<dc:creator>tacitus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23560#comment-49892</guid>
		<description>Dan, think about it.  This article explains exactly why it&#039;s pointless to worry about alerting aliens on other planets as to our existence.

If they have telescopes large enough and powerful enough, they can see us already!  (Well, they can see that there is life on Earth and they can see that there is a technological civilization on Earth too -- chemical pollutants and light emissions from the night-side.

We will almost certainly have telescopes big enough to detect these things from light-years away within a century or two, so imagine what an alien civilization with, say, a 5,000 year lead on us in terms of technology.  (5,000 years is nothing in galactic historical terms).  We have absolutely no hope of hiding our presence from any such advanced civilizations -- if they&#039;re out there, and if they are close enough (within a few hundred light years) then they&#039;ve already spotted Earth, and quite likely already know a great deal about the planet we call home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, think about it.  This article explains exactly why it&#039;s pointless to worry about alerting aliens on other planets as to our existence.</p>
<p>If they have telescopes large enough and powerful enough, they can see us already!  (Well, they can see that there is life on Earth and they can see that there is a technological civilization on Earth too &#8212; chemical pollutants and light emissions from the night-side.</p>
<p>We will almost certainly have telescopes big enough to detect these things from light-years away within a century or two, so imagine what an alien civilization with, say, a 5,000 year lead on us in terms of technology.  (5,000 years is nothing in galactic historical terms).  We have absolutely no hope of hiding our presence from any such advanced civilizations &#8212; if they&#039;re out there, and if they are close enough (within a few hundred light years) then they&#039;ve already spotted Earth, and quite likely already know a great deal about the planet we call home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Tillmanns</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-49891</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Tillmanns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23560#comment-49891</guid>
		<description>Some of the civilizations seen on Star Trek were rather unfriendly and contact with such &quot;people&quot; would be a bad idea.
That&#039;s fictional but some are quite possible. Perhaps a bit of caution is called for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the civilizations seen on Star Trek were rather unfriendly and contact with such &#034;people&#034; would be a bad idea.<br />
That&#039;s fictional but some are quite possible. Perhaps a bit of caution is called for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trux</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-49874</link>
		<dc:creator>trux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23560#comment-49874</guid>
		<description>I hope that we&#039;ll soon see a project similar to SETI@home or other BOINC projects that would link thousands of amateur telescopes into an array, allowing so for hi-resolution observations by amateurs. The number and the quality woud probably not reach those of an array of 150 3m telescopes, but I bet some exciting research could be done anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope that we&#039;ll soon see a project similar to SETI@home or other BOINC projects that would link thousands of amateur telescopes into an array, allowing so for hi-resolution observations by amateurs. The number and the quality woud probably not reach those of an array of 150 3m telescopes, but I bet some exciting research could be done anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave M</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-49871</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23560#comment-49871</guid>
		<description>@alp 
The plots show albedo on the Y axis and wavelength from about 300 - 800 nanometers.  The plots are based on model output data.  The paper explains the model in detail.

You can get a PDF of the paper (which contains the figure at full resolution) at http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0901/0901.1214v1.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@alp<br />
The plots show albedo on the Y axis and wavelength from about 300 &#8211; 800 nanometers.  The plots are based on model output data.  The paper explains the model in detail.</p>
<p>You can get a PDF of the paper (which contains the figure at full resolution) at <a href="http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0901/0901.1214v1.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0901/0901.1214v1.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mang</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-49863</link>
		<dc:creator>Mang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23560#comment-49863</guid>
		<description>An 18 week exposure is difficult but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s impossible.  MOST can take 8.5 week exposures</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An 18 week exposure is difficult but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s impossible.  MOST can take 8.5 week exposures</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alp</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-49857</link>
		<dc:creator>alp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23560#comment-49857</guid>
		<description>Where did the photo of (I assume) Earth and the spectograms come from? I want to see full sized. What is the Y axis of the spectrograms?  X axis is wavelength, what is y?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did the photo of (I assume) Earth and the spectograms come from? I want to see full sized. What is the Y axis of the spectrograms?  X axis is wavelength, what is y?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emission Nebula</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/13/viewing-earth-as-an-extra-solar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-49855</link>
		<dc:creator>Emission Nebula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23560#comment-49855</guid>
		<description>Aaarrrggghhhh!!!! I hate waiting for new awesome telescopes to be made. Being 30 years old I would so love to see continents on an extra solar planet  (assuming life goes smoothly for me) before Im dead. Perhaps this is a field I should look into becoming an engineer for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaarrrggghhhh!!!! I hate waiting for new awesome telescopes to be made. Being 30 years old I would so love to see continents on an extra solar planet  (assuming life goes smoothly for me) before Im dead. Perhaps this is a field I should look into becoming an engineer for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
