<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Ares Construction &quot;Towers&quot; Over 39B</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/06/new-ares-construction-towers-over-39b/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/06/new-ares-construction-towers-over-39b/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:07:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fsm</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/06/new-ares-construction-towers-over-39b/comment-page-1/#comment-48831</link>
		<dc:creator>fsm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23192#comment-48831</guid>
		<description>I wonder if the towers will double up as camera platforms, to film the launches..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the towers will double up as camera platforms, to film the launches..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imo</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/06/new-ares-construction-towers-over-39b/comment-page-1/#comment-48720</link>
		<dc:creator>Imo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23192#comment-48720</guid>
		<description>Ares is inherently more susceptible to a catastrophic failure due to lightning as it uses pre-mixed fuel, unlike Apollo. Similarly if lightning somehow induced an early ignition signal, Ares cannot be shut down.

The towers are needed due to the nature of propellant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ares is inherently more susceptible to a catastrophic failure due to lightning as it uses pre-mixed fuel, unlike Apollo. Similarly if lightning somehow induced an early ignition signal, Ares cannot be shut down.</p>
<p>The towers are needed due to the nature of propellant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith A</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/06/new-ares-construction-towers-over-39b/comment-page-1/#comment-48714</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23192#comment-48714</guid>
		<description>Huygens wrote:
&quot;I wonder why they did not have something like this during the Apollo days? The Saturn 5 was 363 feet tall and it was struck by lightning during the Apollo 12 launch in 1969.&quot;

Further, according to Wiki (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_12), the lightening strike occurred *36.5 seconds* after launch. Altitude at that moment isn&#039;t mentioned, but I&#039;m quite sure no technology of the day was available to build towers of ANY sort as high as the craft was at that moment (nanotech theoretically COULD be used to build such towers, but I&#039;m guessing that will never occur).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huygens wrote:<br />
&#034;I wonder why they did not have something like this during the Apollo days? The Saturn 5 was 363 feet tall and it was struck by lightning during the Apollo 12 launch in 1969.&#034;</p>
<p>Further, according to Wiki (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_12)" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_12)</a>, the lightening strike occurred *36.5 seconds* after launch. Altitude at that moment isn&#039;t mentioned, but I&#039;m quite sure no technology of the day was available to build towers of ANY sort as high as the craft was at that moment (nanotech theoretically COULD be used to build such towers, but I&#039;m guessing that will never occur).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huygens</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/06/new-ares-construction-towers-over-39b/comment-page-1/#comment-48707</link>
		<dc:creator>Huygens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23192#comment-48707</guid>
		<description>Lightning rods as a way to draw lightning away from structures and send it into the ground were well known in the 1960s, along with the fact that the taller you are (and especially if you are made of metal), the better your chances of being zapped.  And if you are full of explosive fuel, even moreso.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lightning rods as a way to draw lightning away from structures and send it into the ground were well known in the 1960s, along with the fact that the taller you are (and especially if you are made of metal), the better your chances of being zapped.  And if you are full of explosive fuel, even moreso.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nephish777</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/06/new-ares-construction-towers-over-39b/comment-page-1/#comment-48694</link>
		<dc:creator>Nephish777</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23192#comment-48694</guid>
		<description>Perhaps NASA, nor anyone else, understood lightning well enough to design an effect lightning protection/suppression system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps NASA, nor anyone else, understood lightning well enough to design an effect lightning protection/suppression system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zvezdichko</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/06/new-ares-construction-towers-over-39b/comment-page-1/#comment-48693</link>
		<dc:creator>Zvezdichko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23192#comment-48693</guid>
		<description>I still wonder why we need to build something like this. Ares&#039; future is not sure, in my opinion the stick design is flawed in its roots and actually there may be a transition to existing rockets like Ares V and Delta IV.

Which is the best decision, because these rockets are already built.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still wonder why we need to build something like this. Ares&#039; future is not sure, in my opinion the stick design is flawed in its roots and actually there may be a transition to existing rockets like Ares V and Delta IV.</p>
<p>Which is the best decision, because these rockets are already built.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Atkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/06/new-ares-construction-towers-over-39b/comment-page-1/#comment-48692</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Atkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23192#comment-48692</guid>
		<description>Live and learn!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Live and learn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huygens</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2009/01/06/new-ares-construction-towers-over-39b/comment-page-1/#comment-48688</link>
		<dc:creator>Huygens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=23192#comment-48688</guid>
		<description>I wonder why they did not have something like this during the Apollo days?  The Saturn 5 was 363 feet tall and it was struck by lightning during the Apollo 12 launch in 1969.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why they did not have something like this during the Apollo days?  The Saturn 5 was 363 feet tall and it was struck by lightning during the Apollo 12 launch in 1969.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
