<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hubble Takes First Visible Light Image of Extrasolar Planet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  8 Nov 2009 10:14:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Louis Morelli</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-2/#comment-41900</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Morelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-41900</guid>
		<description>About: “ Hubble Directly Observes a Planet Orbiting Another Star”

THIS SYSTEM CAN BE VERY OLD, AND NOT YOUNG!
 Interesting news ! Heartiest greetings to the Hubble team &amp; NASA team.  
But... the news has contradictions with known theories and it was a prediction  20 years ago from the Universal Matrix Theory. Are there wrong interpretations from Hubble’s collected data? Let’s see the following: 
1) It is possible that the body is not a planet, anymore. It is brighter than the expected. It can be a very old planet going to be a pulsar;
2) The excess of dust around the star can be disposable material from an old, dying star, and not about a young star;
3) Maybe the star is not so different from the sun, about long life. The sun can reach 10 billions years. We have a lot of data from the sun. We have few data from that star. Who could authorize us to say there is star living only 1, 2 billion years? Everything is suggesting the star has the same time of life like any other star. Our models are suggesting the star is about 7 billions years old. 
The Universal Matrix models ( http://theuniversalmatrix.com )         suggests that  old stars produces dust while its combustible is finishing, like any other fire you see at Earth. When the star become old, its planets are old also, they begin to be brighter, till becoming a pulsar. The tiny edge at the dust can be the initial formation of a new black hole, as we can see at the models. 
By the way, congratulations and thanks for the good job. We work with data like that to testing our models…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About: “ Hubble Directly Observes a Planet Orbiting Another Star”</p>
<p>THIS SYSTEM CAN BE VERY OLD, AND NOT YOUNG!<br />
 Interesting news ! Heartiest greetings to the Hubble team &amp; NASA team.<br />
But&#8230; the news has contradictions with known theories and it was a prediction  20 years ago from the Universal Matrix Theory. Are there wrong interpretations from Hubble’s collected data? Let’s see the following:<br />
1) It is possible that the body is not a planet, anymore. It is brighter than the expected. It can be a very old planet going to be a pulsar;<br />
2) The excess of dust around the star can be disposable material from an old, dying star, and not about a young star;<br />
3) Maybe the star is not so different from the sun, about long life. The sun can reach 10 billions years. We have a lot of data from the sun. We have few data from that star. Who could authorize us to say there is star living only 1, 2 billion years? Everything is suggesting the star has the same time of life like any other star. Our models are suggesting the star is about 7 billions years old.<br />
The Universal Matrix models ( <a href="http://theuniversalmatrix.com" rel="nofollow">http://theuniversalmatrix.com</a> )         suggests that  old stars produces dust while its combustible is finishing, like any other fire you see at Earth. When the star become old, its planets are old also, they begin to be brighter, till becoming a pulsar. The tiny edge at the dust can be the initial formation of a new black hole, as we can see at the models.<br />
By the way, congratulations and thanks for the good job. We work with data like that to testing our models…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wh</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-2/#comment-41257</link>
		<dc:creator>wh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-41257</guid>
		<description>I think I see a little blue in there.  That&#039;s right, that&#039;s why it&#039;s named Fomalhaut b, b stands for blue :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I see a little blue in there.  That&#039;s right, that&#039;s why it&#039;s named Fomalhaut b, b stands for blue <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Occupant</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-2/#comment-41168</link>
		<dc:creator>The Occupant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-41168</guid>
		<description>* * *
Yeah. . .little too much information there, Bigboy.

Anyway, while I am not quite as enthused as some of my fellow posters, I am still delighted and impressed by this discovery.
Great work by all parties!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* * *<br />
Yeah. . .little too much information there, Bigboy.</p>
<p>Anyway, while I am not quite as enthused as some of my fellow posters, I am still delighted and impressed by this discovery.<br />
Great work by all parties!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigboy</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-2/#comment-41031</link>
		<dc:creator>Bigboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 19:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-41031</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m getting a hard on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m getting a hard on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-2/#comment-40973</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-40973</guid>
		<description>Brilliant photo. We are really getting close to the time when we might actually look at another earthlike planet outside our solar system. Then the real space race will begin!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant photo. We are really getting close to the time when we might actually look at another earthlike planet outside our solar system. Then the real space race will begin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bse5150</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-2/#comment-40899</link>
		<dc:creator>bse5150</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 03:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-40899</guid>
		<description>When can we expect good spectroscopic readings from the new planets?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When can we expect good spectroscopic readings from the new planets?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-2/#comment-40772</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 02:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-40772</guid>
		<description>maudyfish:
They discovered the star 1RXS J160929.1-219524 on 1998 the &quot;planet&quot; as they called was identified in 2008.
2M1207b was identified in infrared spectrum september 2004 and it was assumed a &quot;planet&quot; because  it had and inferred mass less than that of a brown dwarf.
Fomalhaut B was identified also identified in 2004 but it was in the visible light spectrum. So it is indeed the first of its kind in the visible spectrum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maudyfish:<br />
They discovered the star 1RXS J160929.1-219524 on 1998 the &#034;planet&#034; as they called was identified in 2008.<br />
2M1207b was identified in infrared spectrum september 2004 and it was assumed a &#034;planet&#034; because  it had and inferred mass less than that of a brown dwarf.<br />
Fomalhaut B was identified also identified in 2004 but it was in the visible light spectrum. So it is indeed the first of its kind in the visible spectrum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-40767</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 01:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-40767</guid>
		<description>and to think people wanted to take hubble  out of service couple of years ago!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and to think people wanted to take hubble  out of service couple of years ago!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcellus</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-40564</link>
		<dc:creator>marcellus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 02:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-40564</guid>
		<description>I love Fomalhaut. When I see it, it reminds me that autumn, and darker skies are near at hand. It is the only bright becon of light in the watery constellations.

This type of story would have been unthinkable in the 1960&#039;s. Just imagine how far we have come since those days.

This is an inspiration to our hopes that humankind will someday reach the stars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Fomalhaut. When I see it, it reminds me that autumn, and darker skies are near at hand. It is the only bright becon of light in the watery constellations.</p>
<p>This type of story would have been unthinkable in the 1960&#039;s. Just imagine how far we have come since those days.</p>
<p>This is an inspiration to our hopes that humankind will someday reach the stars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Hanford</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-40479</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hanford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-40479</guid>
		<description>I think in the short term, astronomers would be most interested in obtaining spectra, polarization data, magnitudes (and any variations) and alternative methods for deducing these new planet&#039;s mass, orbital period, etc. Spectra alone of these new planetary systems, while difficult to obtain, would contain a wealth of info on the physical makeup and numerous other properties of these worlds impossible to obtain with current spectroscopic line-shifting detections of planets and be a big improvement compared to spectra deduced from planetary-transiting systems. Add to that just the aesthetic value of actually seeing a planet orbiting another star...what a way to stir up childrens (and adults) imaginations. These new direct observations were certainly predicted to occur well within our lifetimes, but where and how to look is now seriously being addressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think in the short term, astronomers would be most interested in obtaining spectra, polarization data, magnitudes (and any variations) and alternative methods for deducing these new planet&#039;s mass, orbital period, etc. Spectra alone of these new planetary systems, while difficult to obtain, would contain a wealth of info on the physical makeup and numerous other properties of these worlds impossible to obtain with current spectroscopic line-shifting detections of planets and be a big improvement compared to spectra deduced from planetary-transiting systems. Add to that just the aesthetic value of actually seeing a planet orbiting another star&#8230;what a way to stir up childrens (and adults) imaginations. These new direct observations were certainly predicted to occur well within our lifetimes, but where and how to look is now seriously being addressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-40443</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-40443</guid>
		<description>Most work in acquiring data etc takes time, years for this sort of thing, its better to announce it when your proof is conclusive and undeniable.

Still though I would have loved to see or hear about this back in 2004, how do you keep this stuff to yourself. We should start socializing with high profile astronomers, get them drunk and get them tell us all about the new stuff there working on. Nancy would you be interested in this new task? ... :)

Anyway, it is a great time to be alive guys, and to witness stuff like this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most work in acquiring data etc takes time, years for this sort of thing, its better to announce it when your proof is conclusive and undeniable.</p>
<p>Still though I would have loved to see or hear about this back in 2004, how do you keep this stuff to yourself. We should start socializing with high profile astronomers, get them drunk and get them tell us all about the new stuff there working on. Nancy would you be interested in this new task? &#8230; <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Anyway, it is a great time to be alive guys, and to witness stuff like this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yorick</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-40421</link>
		<dc:creator>Yorick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-40421</guid>
		<description>&quot;question, photographs are from 2004 and 2006, but only now being revealed, in 2008? what have they been doing the past 2 years?&quot;

And announced the same day the European were announcing their discovery, what a coincidence! ;-)
It&#039;s always funny how European and American teams are trying to still each other&#039;s thunder whenever they learn an imminent discovery from the other side of the Atlantic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;question, photographs are from 2004 and 2006, but only now being revealed, in 2008? what have they been doing the past 2 years?&#034;</p>
<p>And announced the same day the European were announcing their discovery, what a coincidence! <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
It&#039;s always funny how European and American teams are trying to still each other&#039;s thunder whenever they learn an imminent discovery from the other side of the Atlantic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in Missouri</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-40417</link>
		<dc:creator>John in Missouri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-40417</guid>
		<description>This is exciting beyond expression.  When I first saw that picture, it took my breath away.  The cosmos is truly awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is exciting beyond expression.  When I first saw that picture, it took my breath away.  The cosmos is truly awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maudyfish</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-40404</link>
		<dc:creator>maudyfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-40404</guid>
		<description>Hey, Ed, those are awesome pics but that system was seen face on.  I wonder if that can be done for all systems?
And what about the two precious star systems that were found in the same manner.  For example 1RXS J160929.1-219524 and 2M1207b.  Seems that these pics are not &quot;the first&quot; as stated.  You need to read the comments on Scientific America that appeared on Daily Astronomy 11-13.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Ed, those are awesome pics but that system was seen face on.  I wonder if that can be done for all systems?<br />
And what about the two precious star systems that were found in the same manner.  For example 1RXS J160929.1-219524 and 2M1207b.  Seems that these pics are not &#034;the first&#034; as stated.  You need to read the comments on Scientific America that appeared on Daily Astronomy 11-13.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Assi</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-40323</link>
		<dc:creator>Assi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:28:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-40323</guid>
		<description>Good job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helio George</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-40293</link>
		<dc:creator>Helio George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-40293</guid>
		<description>Super Duper!!!  Wow!!  This is huge.  Mankind has never imaged another planet outside the solar system, and how long have we been on this planet?

This is as big as when William Herschel shooked the world with his discovery of a planet when no other planet had ever been discovered since the obvious ones.  

In honor of Herschel, I have an idea for a name for one of the planets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Super Duper!!!  Wow!!  This is huge.  Mankind has never imaged another planet outside the solar system, and how long have we been on this planet?</p>
<p>This is as big as when William Herschel shooked the world with his discovery of a planet when no other planet had ever been discovered since the obvious ones.  </p>
<p>In honor of Herschel, I have an idea for a name for one of the planets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ccg</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-40289</link>
		<dc:creator>ccg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 05:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-40289</guid>
		<description>Wonderful !

This picture is absolutely fantastic

@ fsm :  :D

( and since this is my first post : thanks Universe Today ! you guys are the best )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful !</p>
<p>This picture is absolutely fantastic</p>
<p>@ fsm :  <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>( and since this is my first post : thanks Universe Today ! you guys are the best )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-40264</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 03:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-40264</guid>
		<description>This will open a new kind of era for astronomy. It will eventually get a nobel prize fure sure. Time will tell me right or wrong. 
But the impact of directly detecting an extrasolar planet rather than using indirect means such as spectral analysis of stars etc. is huge,
Put it this way. For skepticals, Now you know that for sure, No question added that there are extrasolar planet. So this closes that chapter and open a new one.

I dont know why the author publish this in ApJ.  Maybe because of lack of confidence and the need to get results published. but this is by far one of the discoveries of this century putting it up there with the discovery of microwave background radiation from the big bang etc.

good stuff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will open a new kind of era for astronomy. It will eventually get a nobel prize fure sure. Time will tell me right or wrong.<br />
But the impact of directly detecting an extrasolar planet rather than using indirect means such as spectral analysis of stars etc. is huge,<br />
Put it this way. For skepticals, Now you know that for sure, No question added that there are extrasolar planet. So this closes that chapter and open a new one.</p>
<p>I dont know why the author publish this in ApJ.  Maybe because of lack of confidence and the need to get results published. but this is by far one of the discoveries of this century putting it up there with the discovery of microwave background radiation from the big bang etc.</p>
<p>good stuff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-40232</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-40232</guid>
		<description>Why is this in ApJ and not Nature??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is this in ApJ and not Nature??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-40230</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-40230</guid>
		<description>Bureaucracy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bureaucracy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BHC</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-40226</link>
		<dc:creator>BHC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-40226</guid>
		<description>question, photographs are from 2004 and 2006, but only now being revealed, in 2008?  what have they been doing the past 2 years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>question, photographs are from 2004 and 2006, but only now being revealed, in 2008?  what have they been doing the past 2 years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bse5150</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-40220</link>
		<dc:creator>bse5150</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-40220</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t this discovery one of the holy grails of astronomy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#039;t this discovery one of the holy grails of astronomy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik J</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-40210</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-40210</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the stuff right there. Awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s the stuff right there. Awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vino</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-40207</link>
		<dc:creator>Vino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-40207</guid>
		<description>Amazing work! Start of another era in planetary science!!!
Congrats to the team!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing work! Start of another era in planetary science!!!<br />
Congrats to the team!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fsm</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/11/13/hubble-take-first-visible-light-image-of-extrasolar-planet/comment-page-1/#comment-40206</link>
		<dc:creator>fsm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=21025#comment-40206</guid>
		<description>So, do they have any moons then? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, do they have any moons then? <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
