<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Mars Science Laboratory:  Still Alive, For Now</title> <atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/10/10/mars-science-laboratory-still-alive-for-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/10/10/mars-science-laboratory-still-alive-for-now/</link> <description>Space and astronomy news</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:48:47 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: fsm</title><link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/10/10/mars-science-laboratory-still-alive-for-now/comment-page-1/#comment-35967</link> <dc:creator>fsm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 16:40:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=19429#comment-35967</guid> <description>Funny, I had always thought that just sending more of the successful MERs, with more modern &amp; only slightly heavier instruments, keeping to using solar panels/batteries (again modern ones are better &amp; hence can be smaller) would have been a better and cheaper idea. The MSL uses RTGs which are way more expensive than solar - there have also been a chronic shortage of plutonium 238, using it for the MSL impacts future outer planet missions where RTGs are essential. Heck, just keep building MERs &amp; send one every 2 years, you can evolve/use the same infrastrucure &amp; operators &amp; get costs down..
NASA is very good at doing its most successful designs only a few times, then throwing out all the &quot;tried and tested&quot; tech, and starting again - think Apollo-&gt;Shuttle..(@Michael: I assume you mean Phoenix - it uses Solar, and at the poles you soon have 24 hours darkness. Its been a &quot;cheap&quot; mission, at around $400 million..)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, I had always thought that just sending more of the successful MERs, with more modern &amp; only slightly heavier instruments, keeping to using solar panels/batteries (again modern ones are better &amp; hence can be smaller) would have been a better and cheaper idea. The MSL uses RTGs which are way more expensive than solar &#8211; there have also been a chronic shortage of plutonium 238, using it for the MSL impacts future outer planet missions where RTGs are essential. Heck, just keep building MERs &amp; send one every 2 years, you can evolve/use the same infrastrucure &amp; operators &amp; get costs down..<br
/> NASA is very good at doing its most successful designs only a few times, then throwing out all the &#034;tried and tested&#034; tech, and starting again &#8211; think Apollo-&gt;Shuttle..</p><p>(@Michael: I assume you mean Phoenix &#8211; it uses Solar, and at the poles you soon have 24 hours darkness. Its been a &#034;cheap&#034; mission, at around $400 million..)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael Spencer</title><link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/10/10/mars-science-laboratory-still-alive-for-now/comment-page-1/#comment-35949</link> <dc:creator>Michael Spencer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 11:11:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=19429#comment-35949</guid> <description>I have a really hard time understanding why more than a billion dollars were spent for the Polar Lander- whose mission is nearly over due to RTG depletion. The use of pricey non-rovers is inexplicable.  And now we find our selves a bit short for this superior project. Go figure.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a really hard time understanding why more than a billion dollars were spent for the Polar Lander- whose mission is nearly over due to RTG depletion. The use of pricey non-rovers is inexplicable.  And now we find our selves a bit short for this superior project. Go figure.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ralph Rewes</title><link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/10/10/mars-science-laboratory-still-alive-for-now/comment-page-1/#comment-35910</link> <dc:creator>Ralph Rewes</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:22:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=19429#comment-35910</guid> <description>That is why it is so important to stimulate the general public imagination with more than scientific endeavors. The public need speculations, clearer pictures, questionable subject images, more &quot;faces&quot;, more pyramids, anything that pull enthusiasm out your regular joe.I will back any NASA plans. I think it is very important for humanity to get on the wagon of space exploration. But NASA cannot continue to push forward a dull public relation with half answers, uncertain conclusions and apparent denial of good answers about some unexplainable Martian structure. No more balloon explanations. Tickle the fancy of the public. They are the one who can stops cuts in space exploration.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is why it is so important to stimulate the general public imagination with more than scientific endeavors. The public need speculations, clearer pictures, questionable subject images, more &#034;faces&#034;, more pyramids, anything that pull enthusiasm out your regular joe.</p><p>I will back any NASA plans. I think it is very important for humanity to get on the wagon of space exploration. But NASA cannot continue to push forward a dull public relation with half answers, uncertain conclusions and apparent denial of good answers about some unexplainable Martian structure. No more balloon explanations. Tickle the fancy of the public. They are the one who can stops cuts in space exploration.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)

Served from: php5-n77.wc2.dfw1.stabletransit.com @ 2010-03-21 02:51:53 -->