<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Shuttles on the Pad &#8212; The Last Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/19/two-shuttles-on-the-pad-the-last-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/19/two-shuttles-on-the-pad-the-last-time/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  8 Nov 2009 10:14:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dana Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/19/two-shuttles-on-the-pad-the-last-time/comment-page-1/#comment-35612</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 23:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=18361#comment-35612</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for this article &amp; picture. I have loved &amp; supported the Shuttle Program from the word go &amp; I will miss it very much. I know progress is important &amp; I hope that progress is made, for all our sakes.
Thanks to all who are now working &amp; have worked on the Shuttle program over the years. You&#039;ve added a lot of &#039;magic&#039; &amp; &#039;dreams&#039; to my life.
Best of luck with all of your endeavors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for this article &amp; picture. I have loved &amp; supported the Shuttle Program from the word go &amp; I will miss it very much. I know progress is important &amp; I hope that progress is made, for all our sakes.<br />
Thanks to all who are now working &amp; have worked on the Shuttle program over the years. You&#039;ve added a lot of &#039;magic&#039; &amp; &#039;dreams&#039; to my life.<br />
Best of luck with all of your endeavors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thulasidharan</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/19/two-shuttles-on-the-pad-the-last-time/comment-page-1/#comment-35497</link>
		<dc:creator>thulasidharan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=18361#comment-35497</guid>
		<description>The following list details when both pads have simultaneously hosted space shuttles. 

STS-61-C (Columbia) and STS-51-L (Challenger) 
Dec. 22, 1985 (rollout of 51-L to Pad B) to Jan. 12, 1986 (launch of 61-C from Pad A)


STS-31 (Discovery) and STS-35 (Columbia) 
April 22, 1990 (rollout of STS-35 to Pad A) to April 24, 1990 (launch of STS-31 from Pad B)

STS-35 (Columbia) and STS-41 (Discovery) 
Sep. 4, 1990 (rollout of STS-41 to Pad B) to Oct. 6, 1990 (launch of STS-41 from Pad B)


STS-38 (Atlantis) and STS-35 (Columbia) 
Oct. 14, 1990 (rollout of STS-35 to Pad B) to Nov. 15, 1990 (launch of STS-38 from Pad A)


STS-37 (Atlantis) and STS-39 (Discovery) 
April 1, 1991 (rollout of STS-39 to Pad A) to April 5, 1991 (launch of STS-37 from Pad B)


STS-45 (Atlantis) and STS-49 (Endeavour) 
March 13, 1992 (rollout of STS-49 to Pad B) to March 24, 1992 (launch of STS-45 from Pad A)


STS-50 (Columbia) and STS-46 (Atlantis) 
June 11, 1992 (rollout of STS-46 to Pad B) to June 25, 1992 (launch of STS-50 from Pad A)


STS-56 (Discovery) and STS-55 (Columbia) 
Feb. 7, 1993 (rollout of STS-55 to Pad A) to April 8, 1993 (launch of STS-56 from Pad B)


STS-64 (Discovery) and STS-68 (Endeavour) 
Aug. 19, 1994 (rollout of STS-64 to Pad B) to Aug. 24, 1994 (rollback to VAB of STS-68 from Pad A)


STS-71 (Atlantis) and STS-70 (Discovery) 
May 11, 1995 (rollout of STS-70 to Pad B) to June 8, 1995 (rollback to VAB of STS-70 from Pad B)


STS-71 (Atlantis) and STS-70 (Discovery) 
June 15, 1995 (rollout of STS-70 to Pad B) to June 27, 1995 (launch of STS-71 from Pad A)


STS-70 (Discovery) and STS-69 (Endeavour) 
July 6, 1995 (rollout of STS-69 to Pad A) to July 13, 1995 (launch of STS-70 from Pad B)


STS-69 (Endeavour) and STS-73 (Columbia) 
Aug. 28, 1995 (rollout of STS-73 to Pad B) to Sept. 7, 1995 (launch of STS-69 from Pad A)


STS-73 (Columbia) and STS-74 (Atlantis) 
Oct. 12, 1995 (rollout of STS-74 to Pad A) to Oct. 20, 1995 (launch of STS-73 from Pad B)


STS-95 (Discovery) and STS-88 (Endeavour) 
Oct. 21, 1998 (rollout of STS-88 to Pad A) to Oct. 29, 1998 (launch of STS-95 from Pad B)


STS-103 (Discovery) and STS-99 (Endeavour) 
Dec. 13, 1999 (rollout of STS-99 to Pad A) to Dec. 19, 1999 (launch of STS-103 from Pad B)


STS-104 (Atlantis) and STS-105 (Discovery) 
July 2, 2001 (rollout of STS-105 to Pad A) to July 12, 2001 (launch of STS-104 from Pad B)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following list details when both pads have simultaneously hosted space shuttles. </p>
<p>STS-61-C (Columbia) and STS-51-L (Challenger)<br />
Dec. 22, 1985 (rollout of 51-L to Pad B) to Jan. 12, 1986 (launch of 61-C from Pad A)</p>
<p>STS-31 (Discovery) and STS-35 (Columbia)<br />
April 22, 1990 (rollout of STS-35 to Pad A) to April 24, 1990 (launch of STS-31 from Pad B)</p>
<p>STS-35 (Columbia) and STS-41 (Discovery)<br />
Sep. 4, 1990 (rollout of STS-41 to Pad B) to Oct. 6, 1990 (launch of STS-41 from Pad B)</p>
<p>STS-38 (Atlantis) and STS-35 (Columbia)<br />
Oct. 14, 1990 (rollout of STS-35 to Pad B) to Nov. 15, 1990 (launch of STS-38 from Pad A)</p>
<p>STS-37 (Atlantis) and STS-39 (Discovery)<br />
April 1, 1991 (rollout of STS-39 to Pad A) to April 5, 1991 (launch of STS-37 from Pad B)</p>
<p>STS-45 (Atlantis) and STS-49 (Endeavour)<br />
March 13, 1992 (rollout of STS-49 to Pad B) to March 24, 1992 (launch of STS-45 from Pad A)</p>
<p>STS-50 (Columbia) and STS-46 (Atlantis)<br />
June 11, 1992 (rollout of STS-46 to Pad B) to June 25, 1992 (launch of STS-50 from Pad A)</p>
<p>STS-56 (Discovery) and STS-55 (Columbia)<br />
Feb. 7, 1993 (rollout of STS-55 to Pad A) to April 8, 1993 (launch of STS-56 from Pad B)</p>
<p>STS-64 (Discovery) and STS-68 (Endeavour)<br />
Aug. 19, 1994 (rollout of STS-64 to Pad B) to Aug. 24, 1994 (rollback to VAB of STS-68 from Pad A)</p>
<p>STS-71 (Atlantis) and STS-70 (Discovery)<br />
May 11, 1995 (rollout of STS-70 to Pad B) to June 8, 1995 (rollback to VAB of STS-70 from Pad B)</p>
<p>STS-71 (Atlantis) and STS-70 (Discovery)<br />
June 15, 1995 (rollout of STS-70 to Pad B) to June 27, 1995 (launch of STS-71 from Pad A)</p>
<p>STS-70 (Discovery) and STS-69 (Endeavour)<br />
July 6, 1995 (rollout of STS-69 to Pad A) to July 13, 1995 (launch of STS-70 from Pad B)</p>
<p>STS-69 (Endeavour) and STS-73 (Columbia)<br />
Aug. 28, 1995 (rollout of STS-73 to Pad B) to Sept. 7, 1995 (launch of STS-69 from Pad A)</p>
<p>STS-73 (Columbia) and STS-74 (Atlantis)<br />
Oct. 12, 1995 (rollout of STS-74 to Pad A) to Oct. 20, 1995 (launch of STS-73 from Pad B)</p>
<p>STS-95 (Discovery) and STS-88 (Endeavour)<br />
Oct. 21, 1998 (rollout of STS-88 to Pad A) to Oct. 29, 1998 (launch of STS-95 from Pad B)</p>
<p>STS-103 (Discovery) and STS-99 (Endeavour)<br />
Dec. 13, 1999 (rollout of STS-99 to Pad A) to Dec. 19, 1999 (launch of STS-103 from Pad B)</p>
<p>STS-104 (Atlantis) and STS-105 (Discovery)<br />
July 2, 2001 (rollout of STS-105 to Pad A) to July 12, 2001 (launch of STS-104 from Pad B)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jahmin</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/19/two-shuttles-on-the-pad-the-last-time/comment-page-1/#comment-34598</link>
		<dc:creator>Jahmin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 03:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=18361#comment-34598</guid>
		<description>@Mike
I don&#039;t know if they&#039;re taking the RCO IFM cable with them or not. But, I think the main reasons a rescue would be deemed necessary would be damaged caused during liftoff to the tiles, which means chance of successful reentry goes down. But, I&#039;m with you, saying, ok, get the astronauts back in the rescue shuttle and then why not still try and remote land Atlantis, just in case luck&#039;s on our side and it&#039;s a good landing...

Well, now we&#039;ll have to wait till next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike<br />
I don&#039;t know if they&#039;re taking the RCO IFM cable with them or not. But, I think the main reasons a rescue would be deemed necessary would be damaged caused during liftoff to the tiles, which means chance of successful reentry goes down. But, I&#039;m with you, saying, ok, get the astronauts back in the rescue shuttle and then why not still try and remote land Atlantis, just in case luck&#039;s on our side and it&#039;s a good landing&#8230;</p>
<p>Well, now we&#039;ll have to wait till next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/19/two-shuttles-on-the-pad-the-last-time/comment-page-1/#comment-33923</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 02:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=18361#comment-33923</guid>
		<description>@Jahmin 

They aren&#039;t putting a RCO IFM cable on Atlantis just incase?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jahmin </p>
<p>They aren&#039;t putting a RCO IFM cable on Atlantis just incase?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Sofista - Por Ãºltima vez dos transbordadores ocupan las plataformas</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/19/two-shuttles-on-the-pad-the-last-time/comment-page-1/#comment-33876</link>
		<dc:creator>El Sofista - Por Ãºltima vez dos transbordadores ocupan las plataformas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=18361#comment-33876</guid>
		<description>Es algo poco frecuente pero tambiÃ©n serÃ¡ la Ãºltima vez que suceda: en estos momentos hay dos transbordadores emplazados en dos de las plataformas de lanzamiento del Centro Espacial Kennedy de la NASA   [...]   Fuente: Nancy Atkinson para Universe Today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Es algo poco frecuente pero tambiÃ©n serÃ¡ la Ãºltima vez que suceda: en estos momentos hay dos transbordadores emplazados en dos de las plataformas de lanzamiento del Centro Espacial Kennedy de la NASA   [...]   Fuente: Nancy Atkinson para Universe Today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dollhopf</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/19/two-shuttles-on-the-pad-the-last-time/comment-page-1/#comment-33530</link>
		<dc:creator>dollhopf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=18361#comment-33530</guid>
		<description>hello Jahmin,

&quot;the astronauts would float in space suits from Atlantis to Endeavour&quot;

That should be a protracted activity until the last one can switch out the light and enter the small pressure chamber.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello Jahmin,</p>
<p>&#034;the astronauts would float in space suits from Atlantis to Endeavour&#034;</p>
<p>That should be a protracted activity until the last one can switch out the light and enter the small pressure chamber.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/19/two-shuttles-on-the-pad-the-last-time/comment-page-1/#comment-33466</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 01:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=18361#comment-33466</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Jorge. With your help and a little more research, I&#039;ll answer my own question. STS-104 and 105 were both on pads from 2 Jul 2001 (105 roll out) til 12 Jul 2001 (104 launch).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Jorge. With your help and a little more research, I&#039;ll answer my own question. STS-104 and 105 were both on pads from 2 Jul 2001 (105 roll out) til 12 Jul 2001 (104 launch).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/19/two-shuttles-on-the-pad-the-last-time/comment-page-1/#comment-33461</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=18361#comment-33461</guid>
		<description>Well, FWIW, it&#039;s NASA itself that says this is the first time since July 2001 there are two shuttles on the pads.

I don&#039;t know what to make of it, since STS-104 went up in July 12, wereas STS-105 was the next mission, having taken off almost a month later, in August 10. I know that the shuttle usualy remains for a while in the pad, but one full month?

They do say it, though. See:

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/shuttle/main/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, FWIW, it&#039;s NASA itself that says this is the first time since July 2001 there are two shuttles on the pads.</p>
<p>I don&#039;t know what to make of it, since STS-104 went up in July 12, wereas STS-105 was the next mission, having taken off almost a month later, in August 10. I know that the shuttle usualy remains for a while in the pad, but one full month?</p>
<p>They do say it, though. See:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/shuttle/main/" rel="nofollow">http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/shuttle/main/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrofiend</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/19/two-shuttles-on-the-pad-the-last-time/comment-page-1/#comment-33459</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrofiend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=18361#comment-33459</guid>
		<description>&quot;I hope a rescue isn&#039;t called cause then we&#039;ll be down to only 2 shuttles.&quot;

&gt;I&#039;d say if a rescue mission was necessary, no shuttles would ever fly again, period. So it&#039;d be a bit academic how many shuttles were left...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;I hope a rescue isn&#039;t called cause then we&#039;ll be down to only 2 shuttles.&#034;</p>
<p>&gt;I&#039;d say if a rescue mission was necessary, no shuttles would ever fly again, period. So it&#039;d be a bit academic how many shuttles were left&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/19/two-shuttles-on-the-pad-the-last-time/comment-page-1/#comment-33451</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=18361#comment-33451</guid>
		<description>Can anyone say with certainty if two shuttles have EVER been simultaneously on pads (i.e., date, STS numbers, not just a guess)? I&#039;ve followed the program pretty closely since the beginning and I think this is the first time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone say with certainty if two shuttles have EVER been simultaneously on pads (i.e., date, STS numbers, not just a guess)? I&#039;ve followed the program pretty closely since the beginning and I think this is the first time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jahmin</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/19/two-shuttles-on-the-pad-the-last-time/comment-page-1/#comment-33438</link>
		<dc:creator>Jahmin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=18361#comment-33438</guid>
		<description>@ dollhopf
Yes, I read in an article somewhere that the Flight Director said that once a rescue mission was deemed necessary, then Atlantis would have to be burned up in the atmosphere. Not sure about umanned landing. I dont think leaving it up in orbit is an option due to possible danger as space junk to future missions.

He also said that once a rescue mission was called for, it would take about 5-6 days to launch Endeavour - regarding fueling up maybe and he described how the astronauts would float in space suits from Atlantis to Endeavour. 

I hope a rescue isn&#039;t called cause then we&#039;ll be down to only 2 shuttles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ dollhopf<br />
Yes, I read in an article somewhere that the Flight Director said that once a rescue mission was deemed necessary, then Atlantis would have to be burned up in the atmosphere. Not sure about umanned landing. I dont think leaving it up in orbit is an option due to possible danger as space junk to future missions.</p>
<p>He also said that once a rescue mission was called for, it would take about 5-6 days to launch Endeavour &#8211; regarding fueling up maybe and he described how the astronauts would float in space suits from Atlantis to Endeavour. </p>
<p>I hope a rescue isn&#039;t called cause then we&#039;ll be down to only 2 shuttles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alandee</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/19/two-shuttles-on-the-pad-the-last-time/comment-page-1/#comment-33418</link>
		<dc:creator>alandee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 11:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=18361#comment-33418</guid>
		<description>What a sad sight .. I love the old girls .. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a sad sight .. I love the old girls ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/19/two-shuttles-on-the-pad-the-last-time/comment-page-1/#comment-33327</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 11:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=18361#comment-33327</guid>
		<description>Looks great, even after all these years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks great, even after all these years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sili</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/19/two-shuttles-on-the-pad-the-last-time/comment-page-1/#comment-33326</link>
		<dc:creator>Sili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 10:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=18361#comment-33326</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the clarification about why it&#039;s necessary to move around Endeavour. Still think it&#039;s silly, but at least there&#039;s some sorta rationalisation of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the clarification about why it&#039;s necessary to move around Endeavour. Still think it&#039;s silly, but at least there&#039;s some sorta rationalisation of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dollhopf</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/19/two-shuttles-on-the-pad-the-last-time/comment-page-1/#comment-33304</link>
		<dc:creator>dollhopf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=18361#comment-33304</guid>
		<description>Would a damaged shuttle be abandoned in orbit or be plunged and burned up in the atmosphere? Could it be brought back remotely? What optional actions would a rescue operation include?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would a damaged shuttle be abandoned in orbit or be plunged and burned up in the atmosphere? Could it be brought back remotely? What optional actions would a rescue operation include?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
