<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Endured Unique Explosion That Didn&#039;t Destroy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/10/star-endured-unique-explosion-that-didnt-destroy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/10/star-endured-unique-explosion-that-didnt-destroy/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  8 Nov 2009 10:14:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Don Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/10/star-endured-unique-explosion-that-didnt-destroy/comment-page-1/#comment-32885</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=17915#comment-32885</guid>
		<description>@RetardedFishFrog: The conditions needed to create a black hole can only oocur upon total core collapse - and that destroys the star completely. Furthermore, a black hole which, upon explosion, would release enough energy to create this effect would be stable for much longer than the lifetime of the universe (and hence the star...)

@Richard Diaz: Eta IS a binary system! This was shown more than ten years ago. The secondary seems to be a B type star. Not sure what the mass is, maybe 10 solar masses or so. The orbit is 5.2 years. They form a colliding wind binary, and, yes, the orbit is eccentric, each time the stars approach each other, the X-ray signature and the spectrum change. So, you had some good ideas, but I fear the secondary is not responsible for the explosive behaviour. You probably need much larger tidal forces for that, for example when a massive star passes really close to a supermassive black hole, it may explode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@RetardedFishFrog: The conditions needed to create a black hole can only oocur upon total core collapse &#8211; and that destroys the star completely. Furthermore, a black hole which, upon explosion, would release enough energy to create this effect would be stable for much longer than the lifetime of the universe (and hence the star&#8230;)</p>
<p>@Richard Diaz: Eta IS a binary system! This was shown more than ten years ago. The secondary seems to be a B type star. Not sure what the mass is, maybe 10 solar masses or so. The orbit is 5.2 years. They form a colliding wind binary, and, yes, the orbit is eccentric, each time the stars approach each other, the X-ray signature and the spectrum change. So, you had some good ideas, but I fear the secondary is not responsible for the explosive behaviour. You probably need much larger tidal forces for that, for example when a massive star passes really close to a supermassive black hole, it may explode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Diaz</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/10/star-endured-unique-explosion-that-didnt-destroy/comment-page-1/#comment-32847</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Diaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 23:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=17915#comment-32847</guid>
		<description>Maybe Eta Carinae is actually a binary massive star.  1 with 80+ the mass of the Sun and the other 30+ times the mass of the Sun and they orbit each other in extremely eccentric orbits with a period of 165 years or so and in every orbit, each star&#039;s outer layers hits the outer layers of the other star, which releases a lot of matter into space, while the gravity between the 2 stars tug on each other star&#039;s core, which releases extreme amounts of energy into space from their cores into space making it appear as an explosion smaller than a supernova every 165 years or so. Or less years every time. Possibly when they nearly collide, their gravity doesn&#039;t let the other companion get far as it did last time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Eta Carinae is actually a binary massive star.  1 with 80+ the mass of the Sun and the other 30+ times the mass of the Sun and they orbit each other in extremely eccentric orbits with a period of 165 years or so and in every orbit, each star&#039;s outer layers hits the outer layers of the other star, which releases a lot of matter into space, while the gravity between the 2 stars tug on each other star&#039;s core, which releases extreme amounts of energy into space from their cores into space making it appear as an explosion smaller than a supernova every 165 years or so. Or less years every time. Possibly when they nearly collide, their gravity doesn&#039;t let the other companion get far as it did last time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RetardedFishFrog</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/10/star-endured-unique-explosion-that-didnt-destroy/comment-page-1/#comment-32753</link>
		<dc:creator>RetardedFishFrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 02:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=17915#comment-32753</guid>
		<description>Correction - scale the size of the black hole up from microscopic to whatever size it would have to be to create an explosion that fits the observable data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction &#8211; scale the size of the black hole up from microscopic to whatever size it would have to be to create an explosion that fits the observable data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RetardedFishFrog</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/10/star-endured-unique-explosion-that-didnt-destroy/comment-page-1/#comment-32747</link>
		<dc:creator>RetardedFishFrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 01:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=17915#comment-32747</guid>
		<description>Perhaps at such large stellar masses, the pressure pushing out on the star is not always enough to keep some of the mass from collapsing into a microscopic black hole.  The black hole would be very short-lived and explode within the star creating the stellar explosion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps at such large stellar masses, the pressure pushing out on the star is not always enough to keep some of the mass from collapsing into a microscopic black hole.  The black hole would be very short-lived and explode within the star creating the stellar explosion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/10/star-endured-unique-explosion-that-didnt-destroy/comment-page-1/#comment-32625</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=17915#comment-32625</guid>
		<description>@John: Not by long shot! Anyway, Eta is an ultramassive binary star, it&#039;s pretty much impossible that planets were able to form there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John: Not by long shot! Anyway, Eta is an ultramassive binary star, it&#039;s pretty much impossible that planets were able to form there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mendenhall</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/10/star-endured-unique-explosion-that-didnt-destroy/comment-page-1/#comment-32595</link>
		<dc:creator>John Mendenhall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 14:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=17915#comment-32595</guid>
		<description>Is an infalling hot Jupiter big enough to trigger one of these?

I doubt it, but . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is an infalling hot Jupiter big enough to trigger one of these?</p>
<p>I doubt it, but . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ESA Exile</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/10/star-endured-unique-explosion-that-didnt-destroy/comment-page-1/#comment-32545</link>
		<dc:creator>ESA Exile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 07:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=17915#comment-32545</guid>
		<description>Further to Don&#039;s comment, as the matter is accreted on to the surface it has to come from beyond the white dwarf. As a result novae only occur in binary systems, and close binaries at that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further to Don&#039;s comment, as the matter is accreted on to the surface it has to come from beyond the white dwarf. As a result novae only occur in binary systems, and close binaries at that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/10/star-endured-unique-explosion-that-didnt-destroy/comment-page-1/#comment-32503</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=17915#comment-32503</guid>
		<description>A nova is the thermonuclear ignition of accreted matter on a white dwarf&#039;s surface. Kind of like pouring gasoline on a hot stove burner...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A nova is the thermonuclear ignition of accreted matter on a white dwarf&#039;s surface. Kind of like pouring gasoline on a hot stove burner&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Durden</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/10/star-endured-unique-explosion-that-didnt-destroy/comment-page-1/#comment-32502</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Durden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=17915#comment-32502</guid>
		<description>The way I always understood it, a Supernova was the death of a star, either forming a black hole or just ejecting its mass in all directions.

A Nova (not super) was a stellar explosion which greatly increased the brightness of the star briefly, but did not kill the star/expend all fuel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I always understood it, a Supernova was the death of a star, either forming a black hole or just ejecting its mass in all directions.</p>
<p>A Nova (not super) was a stellar explosion which greatly increased the brightness of the star briefly, but did not kill the star/expend all fuel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/09/10/star-endured-unique-explosion-that-didnt-destroy/comment-page-1/#comment-32501</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=17915#comment-32501</guid>
		<description>Nathan, Nathan, Nathan. I am so envious of you!! ;) Not only do you already have umpteen first-author papers, but now your very own Nature paper.

Fascinating result!! Keep up the good work.

I will not that if the pulsed pair instability mechanism is the correct interpretation, it would need to work on very different timescales. It&#039;s been over 150 years since the Great Outburst of Eta Car, but SN 2006jc went bang just two years after its own LBV eruption.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan, Nathan, Nathan. I am so envious of you!! <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Not only do you already have umpteen first-author papers, but now your very own Nature paper.</p>
<p>Fascinating result!! Keep up the good work.</p>
<p>I will not that if the pulsed pair instability mechanism is the correct interpretation, it would need to work on very different timescales. It&#039;s been over 150 years since the Great Outburst of Eta Car, but SN 2006jc went bang just two years after its own LBV eruption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
