ANCIENT ALIEN

Most of these naysayers are mental midgets and even I am almost certain the LHC people worldwide have done all of their theoretical homework and their analysis is infallible

Things are going too slow in the elegant mathematical theoretical modus operandi style as used by Einstein.

Einstein , with the help of others developed relativity theory on paper using mathematics , although he make some small errors in his proofs of E = MC^2 other things.

As Cosmologist Lee Smolin said , string theory entails infinite possibilities and is very elusive in describing our universe.

Maybe that dog won't hunt.

There are infinite branches to that tree. too many to model and narrow down and fit our particular universe even with M-theory , so although it is an elegant approach , just like Einstein's unified field theory , we don't want to be spending all our time on it when the experimental data starts coming in.

So the shotgun LHC approach may find the answers quicker and after all , string theory has been around for 40 years .

However , they should proceed with caution as some scientists have warned and even Seymour Particles has described in his movie script , because the infinitesimally small probability of a growing black hole must weigh in against the infinitely large negative gain if the unthinkable occurred.

You don't wager your wife and kids entire family and neighbors and your casa and all of your land and earth unless there is no reasonable doubt and you are on the jury.

If the data do not fit (100% almost) you can't permit.

the almost is the problem.

If a boson , which carries some theoretical mass , could mate with a small black hole under special unknowable unspeakable conditions or anything even crazier just might possibly occur , then we should hesitate .contemplate , and postulate …. before we congratulate…

And after all , we are firing up this LHC because we aren't certain about the complete quantum physics in the first place or we would'nt need to fire it up.

Thanks Miss Kate!

Besides there being absolutely no science to support that as a possibility, consider:

When have the Swiss ever destroyed anything?

They're the most neutral people on the face of the planet.. I have a hard time picturing them as the reapers of the human race.

Movie script :
Movie end
scene final

New LHC collider scene everyone making fun of doomsday predicters…Beautiful Rap star singing ….all the cool scientists drinking champagne …everyone laughing .
Scene changes to inside of collider and a strange looking new particle pops out and merges with one of the tiny fizziling black holes and then ….coinciding with the pop from a champagne bottle ,,, a slightly larger black hole is born..

Fade to new black hole

THE END

Deleted scene:
To be beginning of possible sequel

Scene 1 take 1 :

Beautiful rap singer and LHC professors escape via LHC contingency space craft to remote galaxy somewhere far from whats left of the Beautiful Blue Earth which is diminishing in size..while the black part is growing larger in the center…

Second cut scene:
leading to possile second sequel.

A New Earth with two Suns is eventually terraformed and all the children are classical violin virtuosos and scientists named Sherlock , Holmes , Watson , and Kathryn , of course, who are determined to build a bigger and better safer new collider than their parents …no matter what it takes.

First: While mass is equal to energy divided by the square of the speed of light, mass and energy are very much distinguishable entities. In a particle accelerator, kinetic energy is tranformed into myriads of particles which have thing like lepton and baryon numbers, or charge, which kinetic energy does not.
Second: The evidence for a black hole at the center of our Milky Way is VERY strong. (e.g., recent measurements of the Keplerian motion of water masers around Sagittarius A*) Nothing can be "proven" to the very end in physics (only in mathematics), and as long as no strong counterarguments come, that balck hole stays.
Third: When physicists speak of massless particles, they are implying the rest mass. And modern particle physics requires that the photon has a rest mass of 0. It is only the zero rest mass which allows the photon to travel at the one speed no other particle (with rest mass) can reach – the pseed of light in a vacuum.

Finally: This is a lighthearted raps tune. It has no room for footnotes.

You just might force your particle visioned colleagues to take a broad, maybe even interdisciplinary look at the incredible GUT/TOE implications of the work about to begin there. Add another poet or two, maybe even a priest and a peasant and what you've started could go well beyond physics. A GUT/TOE explanation of how things began and will or will not end, possible via that new accelerator, could be the Rosetta Stone ending centuries of conflict and bringing science and religion together. Now that they've heard your rap, maybe the scientists will add a bit of poetry and fiction to their regular mental exercise programming. They might, for example, Google "Buffalo Snow Day" to get a comic but perhaps plausible look at how a broad approach to GUT/TOE fictionally transforms Buffalo, yes Buffalo, into an Athens for the 21st century. Or, e mail me and I'll send anyone six pages of spirited fictional though reality based GUT/TOE interaction between a Nobel Laureate particle researcher and his friend, a leading "Death of God" theologian.

The person posting here under the name Kate McAlpine is not identical with the real Katherine McAlpine who created the LHC rap.

just changing one letter at a time in two steps

PERV
PERN
CERN
nice word play… you are good!!! lol