Lets say we drill that hole thru the earth between the center and the crust again line
it with the same pipe.

example from new york to Las angeles.

Just like the pipe lined hole thrue the center of the earth
you standing at one end I at the other we could make visual contact.

We both would be looking down hill. We each dropped a ball in the drilled hole the balls
would bounce togeather and stay trapped in the middle. although it a straight line

We take that same pipe and lay it on the edge of the earth the ball would settle to the
center of the pipe closest to the crust of the earth.

I call the settling spot the (V) of gravity

This is how I feel the moon is in the gravity (V) of the earth The moon and the earth
in the (V) of the sun and all planets in the (V) of some other bodies and all in the (V)
of each other with one master (V)

All metors are falling somewhere. This could be how spacecraft get around they have
discouverd how to ride the (V) highway

Say now we could take the center out of the middle of the earth, Like pitting an avacado
without desterbing the outer layer. Question would the cintrifical forse of the spinning
earth keep your feet planted so you could walk the unside of the orbe.

OR: would you float helpelessly in the center of the pitted avacado.

Is the universe like a pitted avacado? Think about it, it acts like one.

Go to your garage and weld a handle in the center of a pipe. so you can spin the pipe.
Now insert a marbel and spin the pipe. The marble would fly out of one end or the other
of the pipe.

Take that same pipe and marble into space and spin the pipe and I think you'll find that
the marble finds the center of the pipe and stays there as long as the pipe is spinning.

Sorry about the spelling Hope you can read dislexeia

My thoughts, Thanks
George Manos

Most of the article about Deep Space are either written in a sensational way or sci-fi way. We need this kind of factual articles which makes us think.

Thinking and expressing your thoughts about deep space or any space theory/ objects the way you think should be appreciated as there are no concreate theory/ies for the space yet, thus these thoughts help us to further debate and explore.

I think to our generation the object that can reach to the farthest of the space and phenomemon will be our thought.

Keep thinking and sharing your thought.

And Ian, all the best mate and waiting to rea more from you.

- Mike

The whole universe is powered more by electricity than by gravity. The inverse square law that gravity operates by prevents greater interaction by this force. Electrical energy is not confined to this reductionist law.

We live in an electric universe.

Let's imagine that some while ago — 65 million years or so, long before Pluto was demoted — there were ten planets: five rocky worlds, a few gas giants, and an ice ball.

Then, one day, without warning (because there was no one around to see it) something slammed into the fifth planet. It might have been a rogue planet, or a big ice ball, or it may have been the planet's own unstable nature.

Whatever the cause, the fifth planet was all but disintegrated. Chunks flew in all directions: one may have sideswiped what is now Mars, carving out the southern hemisphere; one may have reversed the spin on Venus; another might have knocked Uranus on its ear; and a sizable one killed the dinosaurs on Earth (while yet another still draws tourists to Australia).

In time, the inner planets drifted outward to fill the void. Earth went from unbearably hot to temperate. Formerly temperate Mars became icy. The debris spread out until it completely encircled the sun. (In the fantasy version of this story, the Martians recognized their plight, and moved all of their belongings to Earth.)

Since all of the planets were formed in essentially the same way, this theory makes more sense to me than the prevailing notion that one of the planets simply forgot to form.

-garison

sorry… my knowledge is limited… but i love science

Just a few responses to John Kulick's mysteries

(1) Excess heat – Safir is right, as different models of gas giants produce different cooling timescales. The high pressure behaviour of hydrogen and helium is still largely a big blank. Also there might be other energy sources other than the initial gravitational collapse. Helium rain-out is one suggestion, another is natural fission reactors in the deep core.

(2) Angular momentum – most is in the planets, so the current puzzle is just how it was transferred from the collapsing Sun to the nebula disk. Magnetic coupling is one reasonable possibility – intense magnetic fields are seen in young stars and they might be sufficient. Another possibility is convection in the collapsing proto-solar cloud. Or the Sun formed separately and captured the planets from a fellow proto-star in their common birth nebula.

(3)The Inner Planets – formed without gaseous envelopes because of the bright early Sun. No mystery there. The real puzzle is how Hot Jupiters got to their current orbits, and that is explained by orbital migration, which was recently in the news. Another possibility is that captured planets on nearly hyperbolic orbits encountered retardation by a gas/dust disk which slowed them for capture, but dissipated before the planets circularised their orbits.

There's lots of mysteries, but there's also lots of theories on how they came about. The adventure of science is that there is so much yet to discover, and the work of science is developing experiments (lab or observational) to distinguish between all the good ideas available.

This is my theory. . . But it seems logical to me.