<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Constellation Project Parachute Tests: Ares I Success, Orion Failure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/08/10/constellation-project-parachute-tests-ares-i-success-orion-failure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/08/10/constellation-project-parachute-tests-ares-i-success-orion-failure/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  8 Nov 2009 10:14:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How to Get Six Pack Fast</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/08/10/constellation-project-parachute-tests-ares-i-success-orion-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-63396</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Get Six Pack Fast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=16644#comment-63396</guid>
		<description>I follow your blog for quite a long time and must tell you that your posts always prove to be of a high value and quality for readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I follow your blog for quite a long time and must tell you that your posts always prove to be of a high value and quality for readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R2K</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/08/10/constellation-project-parachute-tests-ares-i-success-orion-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-29317</link>
		<dc:creator>R2K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 14:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=16644#comment-29317</guid>
		<description>Uh... what is wrong with the parachute technology that we perfected in the 1900s?  We do we have to reinvent the wheel on every minute part of this project?  That will only make it cost more and take longer to finish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh&#8230; what is wrong with the parachute technology that we perfected in the 1900s?  We do we have to reinvent the wheel on every minute part of this project?  That will only make it cost more and take longer to finish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxwell</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/08/10/constellation-project-parachute-tests-ares-i-success-orion-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-29251</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 23:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=16644#comment-29251</guid>
		<description>I think the recent events with Russia and its growing squabble in Georgia will soon put Constellation in a new light. 

Failures = Bad
Five year gap = Bad

Short of dumping a few hundred billion into the program, is there any way to jump start this thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the recent events with Russia and its growing squabble in Georgia will soon put Constellation in a new light. </p>
<p>Failures = Bad<br />
Five year gap = Bad</p>
<p>Short of dumping a few hundred billion into the program, is there any way to jump start this thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rusty</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/08/10/constellation-project-parachute-tests-ares-i-success-orion-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-29205</link>
		<dc:creator>Rusty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=16644#comment-29205</guid>
		<description>No more coffee for you...   ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No more coffee for you&#8230;   <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David R.</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/08/10/constellation-project-parachute-tests-ares-i-success-orion-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-29131</link>
		<dc:creator>David R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=16644#comment-29131</guid>
		<description>&quot;Although an obvious set-back for the Orion parachute system, the NASA memo highlights that it was a &#039;test technique failure&#039; and not a failure of the technology itself.&quot;

In another move by 12 angry scientists, the perchlorate consipracy widens to the Orion system.  Sensing an opportunity to launch their case before the world, 12 defensive Mars Phoenix Lander scientists derailed the Orion parachute, citing creative differences with their former Orion cronies.  The scientists, wearing cabana shirts and drinking massive amounts of gin, arranged the chute failure.  The drunken scientists arrived at a NASA children&#039;s exhibit chanting, &quot;Apollo was a hoax! Long live Phoenix!&quot;  Meanwhile, speculation mounted that the 12 Angry Scientists were really working on Project Lucifer.  &quot;Project Lucifer is not dead, at least not &#039;till perchlorate is given its rightful place&quot; one scientist mumbled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;Although an obvious set-back for the Orion parachute system, the NASA memo highlights that it was a &#039;test technique failure&#039; and not a failure of the technology itself.&#034;</p>
<p>In another move by 12 angry scientists, the perchlorate consipracy widens to the Orion system.  Sensing an opportunity to launch their case before the world, 12 defensive Mars Phoenix Lander scientists derailed the Orion parachute, citing creative differences with their former Orion cronies.  The scientists, wearing cabana shirts and drinking massive amounts of gin, arranged the chute failure.  The drunken scientists arrived at a NASA children&#039;s exhibit chanting, &#034;Apollo was a hoax! Long live Phoenix!&#034;  Meanwhile, speculation mounted that the 12 Angry Scientists were really working on Project Lucifer.  &#034;Project Lucifer is not dead, at least not &#039;till perchlorate is given its rightful place&#034; one scientist mumbled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
