<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unusual Exoplanet Dances in Sync With Its Sun-Like Star</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/28/unusual-exoplanet-dances-in-sync-with-its-sun-like-star/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/28/unusual-exoplanet-dances-in-sync-with-its-sun-like-star/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:17:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe M.</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/28/unusual-exoplanet-dances-in-sync-with-its-sun-like-star/comment-page-1/#comment-30737</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 12:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=16098#comment-30737</guid>
		<description>Why do scientists name the planets after the satellites that found them? Are they being lazy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do scientists name the planets after the satellites that found them? Are they being lazy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aodhhan</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/28/unusual-exoplanet-dances-in-sync-with-its-sun-like-star/comment-page-1/#comment-27489</link>
		<dc:creator>Aodhhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=16098#comment-27489</guid>
		<description>I would lean towards this planet having a solid core (my theory on some of these &#039;hot jupiters&#039;). It would be interesting to see any astrometry figures taken, and to know a bit more precisely how close this is to its star; obviously inside a &#039;Mercury&quot; orbit, but nothing is really stated.

As for the spin sync. Possibly a polarization attraction and or repulsion; either currently or in the past.

If current theory about hot jupiters are correct, then this planet migrated towards its star. Something had to bring them closer together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would lean towards this planet having a solid core (my theory on some of these &#039;hot jupiters&#039;). It would be interesting to see any astrometry figures taken, and to know a bit more precisely how close this is to its star; obviously inside a &#039;Mercury&#034; orbit, but nothing is really stated.</p>
<p>As for the spin sync. Possibly a polarization attraction and or repulsion; either currently or in the past.</p>
<p>If current theory about hot jupiters are correct, then this planet migrated towards its star. Something had to bring them closer together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LLDIAZ</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/28/unusual-exoplanet-dances-in-sync-with-its-sun-like-star/comment-page-1/#comment-27381</link>
		<dc:creator>LLDIAZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=16098#comment-27381</guid>
		<description>yeah I think they have it wrong as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah I think they have it wrong as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/28/unusual-exoplanet-dances-in-sync-with-its-sun-like-star/comment-page-1/#comment-27361</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=16098#comment-27361</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Astronomers feel the planet is too low in mass and too distant from the star for the star to have any major influence on the planet&#039;s rotation&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Shouldn&#039;t this be the other way around? Shouldn&#039;t the planet be too low in mass and too distant to the star for the &lt;b&gt;planet&lt;/b&gt; to have any major influence on the &lt;b&gt;star&lt;/b&gt;&#039;s rotation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Astronomers feel the planet is too low in mass and too distant from the star for the star to have any major influence on the planet&#039;s rotation</p></blockquote>
<p>Shouldn&#039;t this be the other way around? Shouldn&#039;t the planet be too low in mass and too distant to the star for the <b>planet</b> to have any major influence on the <b>star</b>&#039;s rotation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
