<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hubble Survey of Gravitational Lenses Yields Measure of Dark Matter in Distant Galaxies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/21/hubble-survey-of-gravitational-lenses-yields-measure-of-dark-matter-in-distant-galaxies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/21/hubble-survey-of-gravitational-lenses-yields-measure-of-dark-matter-in-distant-galaxies/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:17:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Astrofiend</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/21/hubble-survey-of-gravitational-lenses-yields-measure-of-dark-matter-in-distant-galaxies/comment-page-1/#comment-26855</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrofiend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15685#comment-26855</guid>
		<description>alphonso richardson Says:
July 23rd, 2008 at 2:12 am 

Thanks mate. It was really intended as a cheeky post. A bit hard to convey that sense through written word only though!

I&#039;m not anti-anygiventheory, I just take exception to the way in which some people put their point across. I agree with you though - science never got anywhere but through a wide open mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alphonso richardson Says:<br />
July 23rd, 2008 at 2:12 am </p>
<p>Thanks mate. It was really intended as a cheeky post. A bit hard to convey that sense through written word only though!</p>
<p>I&#039;m not anti-anygiventheory, I just take exception to the way in which some people put their point across. I agree with you though &#8211; science never got anywhere but through a wide open mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Flower</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/21/hubble-survey-of-gravitational-lenses-yields-measure-of-dark-matter-in-distant-galaxies/comment-page-1/#comment-26814</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Flower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15685#comment-26814</guid>
		<description>Dark Matter != Dark Energy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dark Matter != Dark Energy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alphonso richardson</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/21/hubble-survey-of-gravitational-lenses-yields-measure-of-dark-matter-in-distant-galaxies/comment-page-1/#comment-26768</link>
		<dc:creator>alphonso richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15685#comment-26768</guid>
		<description>Whoa, there &#039;fiend!

i&#039;ve always followed your posts. Clearly you&#039;re very passionate about this, but let&#039;s not get too bogged down with it.
We both know D.E hasn&#039;t been proven OR disproven to exist, but it doesn&#039;t hurt to look at other models to explain unexpected phenomena.
Let&#039;s see where the evidence takes us when it comes in.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, there &#039;fiend!</p>
<p>i&#039;ve always followed your posts. Clearly you&#039;re very passionate about this, but let&#039;s not get too bogged down with it.<br />
We both know D.E hasn&#039;t been proven OR disproven to exist, but it doesn&#039;t hurt to look at other models to explain unexpected phenomena.<br />
Let&#039;s see where the evidence takes us when it comes in&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Hanford</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/21/hubble-survey-of-gravitational-lenses-yields-measure-of-dark-matter-in-distant-galaxies/comment-page-1/#comment-26626</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hanford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 02:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15685#comment-26626</guid>
		<description>Just wait until deep, fast all-sky deep, fast all-sky surveys commence (e.g. PAN-STARRS, etc.) in a few years combined with the next generation of space &amp; huge ground-based obser vatories that will come online. The number &amp; diversity of new gravitational lenses may be spectacular &amp; informative to astronomers interested in Dark Matter and galaxy evolution in distant galaxies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wait until deep, fast all-sky deep, fast all-sky surveys commence (e.g. PAN-STARRS, etc.) in a few years combined with the next generation of space &amp; huge ground-based obser vatories that will come online. The number &amp; diversity of new gravitational lenses may be spectacular &amp; informative to astronomers interested in Dark Matter and galaxy evolution in distant galaxies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrofiend</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/21/hubble-survey-of-gravitational-lenses-yields-measure-of-dark-matter-in-distant-galaxies/comment-page-1/#comment-26616</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrofiend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15685#comment-26616</guid>
		<description>Now we just have to wait for some dolt to exclaim that dark matter doesn&#039;t really exist and is just a theory, that our cosmology is flawed etc. etc, and the usual UT dark matter blog-comment fiasco can ensue...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now we just have to wait for some dolt to exclaim that dark matter doesn&#039;t really exist and is just a theory, that our cosmology is flawed etc. etc, and the usual UT dark matter blog-comment fiasco can ensue&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
