<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snuggling Up to Venus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/17/snuggling-up-to-venus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/17/snuggling-up-to-venus/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  8 Nov 2009 08:15:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Al Laderman</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/17/snuggling-up-to-venus/comment-page-1/#comment-26491</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Laderman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 23:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15595#comment-26491</guid>
		<description>How does the ESA mission differ from the JPL/Hughes Space and Comm mission 2(?) decades ago, which pioneered aerobraking to circularize and reduce the orbit to enable radar imaging of Venus?  I believe the north polar region was a prime target of that mission.

Al</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does the ESA mission differ from the JPL/Hughes Space and Comm mission 2(?) decades ago, which pioneered aerobraking to circularize and reduce the orbit to enable radar imaging of Venus?  I believe the north polar region was a prime target of that mission.</p>
<p>Al</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neoguru</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/17/snuggling-up-to-venus/comment-page-1/#comment-26372</link>
		<dc:creator>neoguru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15595#comment-26372</guid>
		<description>I gotta agree with Astrofiend. We don&#039;t hear much about Venus even though it&#039;s closer and far more dynamic then Mars. My guess is that it will probably never host a human visitor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gotta agree with Astrofiend. We don&#039;t hear much about Venus even though it&#039;s closer and far more dynamic then Mars. My guess is that it will probably never host a human visitor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrofiend</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/17/snuggling-up-to-venus/comment-page-1/#comment-26323</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrofiend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15595#comment-26323</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s something about this mission that just never inspired me like almost every other space mission does. I think it has something to do with the fact that the team is HOPELESS at communicating their findings to the public; you simply never hear a peep from them, even on the main mission website.

It&#039;s disappointing, because pre-launch I was looking forward to it with great anticipation. Doubly disappointing, because the science is of a very high quality, and quite ground-breaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#039;s something about this mission that just never inspired me like almost every other space mission does. I think it has something to do with the fact that the team is HOPELESS at communicating their findings to the public; you simply never hear a peep from them, even on the main mission website.</p>
<p>It&#039;s disappointing, because pre-launch I was looking forward to it with great anticipation. Doubly disappointing, because the science is of a very high quality, and quite ground-breaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
