<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: StarGazer&#039;s Telescope:  So Long, Saturn&#8230;</title> <atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/12/stargazers-telescope-so-long-saturn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/12/stargazers-telescope-so-long-saturn/</link> <description>Space and astronomy news</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:06:45 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Tammy Plotner</title><link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/12/stargazers-telescope-so-long-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-25962</link> <dc:creator>Tammy Plotner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 13:49:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15526#comment-25962</guid> <description>Hi, James!I very much suggest the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/17/telescope-review-celestron-nexstar-102-slt/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Celestron NextStar 102&lt;/a&gt;.  They are under $500, and that&#039;s inexpensive for a GoTo telescope.If you&#039;d like to be a bit more thrifty, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/12/celestron-sky-scout-scope-90-review/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Celestron Sky Scout Scope 90&lt;/a&gt; is also an excellent choice - it&#039;s around $200 but you aim and track yourself.Even more small telescope reviews will be coming up in the near future - ones that don&#039;t break your wallet and are worthy equipment.  In the meantime?  Steer clear of ANY telescope you see in a department store.  There&#039;s a brand name manufucturer out there that has one that&#039;s not worth it, depsite the name on the scope.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, James!</p><p>I very much suggest the <a
href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/17/telescope-review-celestron-nexstar-102-slt/" rel="nofollow">Celestron NextStar 102</a>.  They are under $500, and that&#039;s inexpensive for a GoTo telescope.</p><p>If you&#039;d like to be a bit more thrifty, the <a
href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/12/celestron-sky-scout-scope-90-review/" rel="nofollow">Celestron Sky Scout Scope 90</a> is also an excellent choice &#8211; it&#039;s around $200 but you aim and track yourself.</p><p>Even more small telescope reviews will be coming up in the near future &#8211; ones that don&#039;t break your wallet and are worthy equipment.  In the meantime?  Steer clear of ANY telescope you see in a department store.  There&#039;s a brand name manufucturer out there that has one that&#039;s not worth it, depsite the name on the scope.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James</title><link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/12/stargazers-telescope-so-long-saturn/comment-page-1/#comment-25928</link> <dc:creator>James</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:42:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15526#comment-25928</guid> <description>that is simply amazing. Awesome article, thank you!Now where could I go about getting such a telescope, and what would the price tag on it be?I desperately want to see the planets with my own eyes.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is simply amazing. Awesome article, thank you!</p><p>Now where could I go about getting such a telescope, and what would the price tag on it be?</p><p>I desperately want to see the planets with my own eyes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)

Served from: php5-n63.wc2.dfw1.stabletransit.com @ 2010-03-21 18:09:38 -->