<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;Starlight Zone&quot; Interview Now Online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/05/starlight-zone-interview-now-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/05/starlight-zone-interview-now-online/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:17:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kazelbhg</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/05/starlight-zone-interview-now-online/comment-page-1/#comment-26332</link>
		<dc:creator>Kazelbhg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15397#comment-26332</guid>
		<description>Hi webmaster!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi webmaster!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kazelyyf</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/05/starlight-zone-interview-now-online/comment-page-1/#comment-26330</link>
		<dc:creator>Kazelyyf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15397#comment-26330</guid>
		<description>Hi webmaster!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi webmaster!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TD</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/05/starlight-zone-interview-now-online/comment-page-1/#comment-25416</link>
		<dc:creator>TD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15397#comment-25416</guid>
		<description>Sorry, the end of that  last comment was not directed at Universetoday.com, the article, or those featured in it.....some of what I read on the internet gets very frustrating....it just carried over into that last comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, the end of that  last comment was not directed at Universetoday.com, the article, or those featured in it&#8230;..some of what I read on the internet gets very frustrating&#8230;.it just carried over into that last comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TD</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/05/starlight-zone-interview-now-online/comment-page-1/#comment-25414</link>
		<dc:creator>TD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 20:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15397#comment-25414</guid>
		<description>Would someone estimate the cost of a one-way trip to mars - it must still be huge (tens/hundreds of billions) to have any chance of success.  Save the money and build 12 bio-analysis rovers and really figure out if there&#039;s life on Mars or not.  The official scientific answer of  &quot;we don&#039;t know&quot; is just not gonna cut it any more.    It&#039;s just to obvious a question that needs to be answered to have resulted in a pathetic two attempts to find it in 50 years.   I can say from first hand conversations with the non-space oriented public - microbes or rudimentary life on Mars is just no big deal.  If there&#039;re cold feet to finding an announcing life on Mars then get over it and get on with it.  Arguing about whether pluto should be classified a planet or whether we would ever send an intential one-way mission is marginally entertaining, but appears very distracting from the main issue - it&#039;s been 50 years and we still don&#039;t know if there&#039;s any life on Mars?  Really?  Sign up some new defenders of this ignorance, because the current set is a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would someone estimate the cost of a one-way trip to mars &#8211; it must still be huge (tens/hundreds of billions) to have any chance of success.  Save the money and build 12 bio-analysis rovers and really figure out if there&#039;s life on Mars or not.  The official scientific answer of  &#034;we don&#039;t know&#034; is just not gonna cut it any more.    It&#039;s just to obvious a question that needs to be answered to have resulted in a pathetic two attempts to find it in 50 years.   I can say from first hand conversations with the non-space oriented public &#8211; microbes or rudimentary life on Mars is just no big deal.  If there&#039;re cold feet to finding an announcing life on Mars then get over it and get on with it.  Arguing about whether pluto should be classified a planet or whether we would ever send an intential one-way mission is marginally entertaining, but appears very distracting from the main issue &#8211; it&#039;s been 50 years and we still don&#039;t know if there&#039;s any life on Mars?  Really?  Sign up some new defenders of this ignorance, because the current set is a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
