<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phoenix Press Conference Update:  Proof of Water Ice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/20/phoenix-press-conference-update-proof-of-water-ice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/20/phoenix-press-conference-update-proof-of-water-ice/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:17:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: marble doctor</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/20/phoenix-press-conference-update-proof-of-water-ice/comment-page-1/#comment-60024</link>
		<dc:creator>marble doctor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15217#comment-60024</guid>
		<description>I am very happy that I found this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very happy that I found this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark McRude</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/20/phoenix-press-conference-update-proof-of-water-ice/comment-page-1/#comment-24416</link>
		<dc:creator>mark McRude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15217#comment-24416</guid>
		<description>This is really Cool stuff!! I can&#039;t wait until they confirm it!!!

  I am a little disturbed by the fact that so many &quot;trivial&quot; things are bugging this particular adventure on the planet.  They&#039;ve had 32 years to work out the wrinkles from the Viking landers and it seems they are having similar problems in the same areas like - 

RETRIEVING the SAMPLES!!!!   
But Good Job NASA!!  
Can they make Ice Cream out of Martian water Ice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really Cool stuff!! I can&#039;t wait until they confirm it!!!</p>
<p>  I am a little disturbed by the fact that so many &#034;trivial&#034; things are bugging this particular adventure on the planet.  They&#039;ve had 32 years to work out the wrinkles from the Viking landers and it seems they are having similar problems in the same areas like &#8211; </p>
<p>RETRIEVING the SAMPLES!!!!<br />
But Good Job NASA!!<br />
Can they make Ice Cream out of Martian water Ice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: watchful stone guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/20/phoenix-press-conference-update-proof-of-water-ice/comment-page-1/#comment-24356</link>
		<dc:creator>watchful stone guardian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15217#comment-24356</guid>
		<description>For those more familiar with metric than imperial two-thirds of an inch (2/3&quot;) works out to be 17 mm. Both seem to be very unusual numbers to choose for a scale. Maybe NASA is using the &quot;Martian Metre&quot; to go along with the &quot;Sol&quot;.

(The metre on Earth was originally defined as one-ten millionth of the distance from the north pole to the equator through Paris, France. So using the same definition on Mars the metre would be about 53.3 cm long thus the scale on the photo would be 32 martian millimetres)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those more familiar with metric than imperial two-thirds of an inch (2/3&#034;) works out to be 17 mm. Both seem to be very unusual numbers to choose for a scale. Maybe NASA is using the &#034;Martian Metre&#034; to go along with the &#034;Sol&#034;.</p>
<p>(The metre on Earth was originally defined as one-ten millionth of the distance from the north pole to the equator through Paris, France. So using the same definition on Mars the metre would be about 53.3 cm long thus the scale on the photo would be 32 martian millimetres)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave S</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/20/phoenix-press-conference-update-proof-of-water-ice/comment-page-1/#comment-24352</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15217#comment-24352</guid>
		<description>This potential water ice can be been in the twin rovers tracks.  Couldn&#039;t NASA return to one of the tracks they photographed and see if the white material has sublimated there as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This potential water ice can be been in the twin rovers tracks.  Couldn&#039;t NASA return to one of the tracks they photographed and see if the white material has sublimated there as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mek</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/20/phoenix-press-conference-update-proof-of-water-ice/comment-page-1/#comment-24240</link>
		<dc:creator>Mek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 09:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15217#comment-24240</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s pretty odd that he said &quot;proof&quot; (it&#039;s strong, powerful evidence but it&#039;s still not proof!)

That said I am for one convinced. Now please test some of it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s pretty odd that he said &#034;proof&#034; (it&#039;s strong, powerful evidence but it&#039;s still not proof!)</p>
<p>That said I am for one convinced. Now please test some of it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quasidog</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/20/phoenix-press-conference-update-proof-of-water-ice/comment-page-1/#comment-24220</link>
		<dc:creator>quasidog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 01:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15217#comment-24220</guid>
		<description>.... &#039;pretty confident&#039;  is not &#039;proof&#039;.    I am going to remain skeptical until they do the oven tests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;. &#039;pretty confident&#039;  is not &#039;proof&#039;.    I am going to remain skeptical until they do the oven tests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Atkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/20/phoenix-press-conference-update-proof-of-water-ice/comment-page-1/#comment-24205</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Atkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 18:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15217#comment-24205</guid>
		<description>Damo-
The inset is a close-up of the ice nuggets that are visible in the image from Sol 20 but have disappeared by Sol 24</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damo-<br />
The inset is a close-up of the ice nuggets that are visible in the image from Sol 20 but have disappeared by Sol 24</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Hanford</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/20/phoenix-press-conference-update-proof-of-water-ice/comment-page-1/#comment-24199</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hanford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15217#comment-24199</guid>
		<description>Just clicked in here after checking out news and seeing this all over the place. I&#039;m sure there will be a lot of good and bad gab here, as usual, but must at least add my own &quot;Hoorah&quot; to the line. One other good comment, the photo here is better than others I saw, and even with a good zoom, it held quality. I see many spots I would personally consider very likely signs of the sublimination of the ice,. even in the base of the trench. More study of other photos may confirm a good number of ice clumps not mentioned in news articles. I, for one, will certainly keep studying these, and may even click into NASA to see if I can get a few more of the series they took here!                                                                                                                           I totally agree with Koostar&#039;s interpretation of this new development. NASA&#039;s mantra of &#039;follow the water&#039; has almost certainly been fulfilled. Now the task of analyzing impurities in the ice can commence. Bravo Phoenix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just clicked in here after checking out news and seeing this all over the place. I&#039;m sure there will be a lot of good and bad gab here, as usual, but must at least add my own &#034;Hoorah&#034; to the line. One other good comment, the photo here is better than others I saw, and even with a good zoom, it held quality. I see many spots I would personally consider very likely signs of the sublimination of the ice,. even in the base of the trench. More study of other photos may confirm a good number of ice clumps not mentioned in news articles. I, for one, will certainly keep studying these, and may even click into NASA to see if I can get a few more of the series they took here!                                                                                                                           I totally agree with Koostar&#039;s interpretation of this new development. NASA&#039;s mantra of &#039;follow the water&#039; has almost certainly been fulfilled. Now the task of analyzing impurities in the ice can commence. Bravo Phoenix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damo</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/20/phoenix-press-conference-update-proof-of-water-ice/comment-page-1/#comment-24197</link>
		<dc:creator>Damo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 16:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15217#comment-24197</guid>
		<description>Sorry if I missed the explanation of what difference is between the inset &amp; the main picture.  If I haven&#039;t, why don&#039;t folks clearly explain the difference between the two?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry if I missed the explanation of what difference is between the inset &amp; the main picture.  If I haven&#039;t, why don&#039;t folks clearly explain the difference between the two?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun Prabhu</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/20/phoenix-press-conference-update-proof-of-water-ice/comment-page-1/#comment-24167</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun Prabhu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15217#comment-24167</guid>
		<description>Why not white clay or marble like stone ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not white clay or marble like stone ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: giovanni</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/20/phoenix-press-conference-update-proof-of-water-ice/comment-page-1/#comment-24165</link>
		<dc:creator>giovanni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15217#comment-24165</guid>
		<description>so,in the base of the trench a white clump  has been  exposed and its no longer there.
couldnt it be that un upward spiralling of dust such as a willy-willy which are common on mars  has covered the white clump?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so,in the base of the trench a white clump  has been  exposed and its no longer there.<br />
couldnt it be that un upward spiralling of dust such as a willy-willy which are common on mars  has covered the white clump?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Lam</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/20/phoenix-press-conference-update-proof-of-water-ice/comment-page-1/#comment-24162</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Lam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 11:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15217#comment-24162</guid>
		<description>Hmm!  Why can&#039;t this &quot;evaporated&quot; water be detected in what there is of the Mars atmosphere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm!  Why can&#039;t this &#034;evaporated&#034; water be detected in what there is of the Mars atmosphere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kootstar</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/20/phoenix-press-conference-update-proof-of-water-ice/comment-page-1/#comment-24159</link>
		<dc:creator>Kootstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 06:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15217#comment-24159</guid>
		<description>Just clicked in here after checking out news and seeing this all over the place. I&#039;m sure there will be a lot of good and bad gab here, as usual, but must at least add my own &quot;Hoorah&quot;  to the line. One other good comment, the photo here is better than others I saw, and even with a good zoom, it held quality. I see many spots I would personally consider very likely signs of the sublimination of the ice,. even in the base of the trench. More study of other photos may confirm a good number of  ice clumps not mentioned in news articles.  I, for one, will certainly keep studying these, and may even click into NASA to see if I can get a few more of the series they took here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just clicked in here after checking out news and seeing this all over the place. I&#039;m sure there will be a lot of good and bad gab here, as usual, but must at least add my own &#034;Hoorah&#034;  to the line. One other good comment, the photo here is better than others I saw, and even with a good zoom, it held quality. I see many spots I would personally consider very likely signs of the sublimination of the ice,. even in the base of the trench. More study of other photos may confirm a good number of  ice clumps not mentioned in news articles.  I, for one, will certainly keep studying these, and may even click into NASA to see if I can get a few more of the series they took here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quantum_Flux</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/20/phoenix-press-conference-update-proof-of-water-ice/comment-page-1/#comment-24157</link>
		<dc:creator>Quantum_Flux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 06:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15217#comment-24157</guid>
		<description>Wahooo!  Start popping the champain corks NASA (but don&#039;t get any on the telemetry controls though)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wahooo!  Start popping the champain corks NASA (but don&#039;t get any on the telemetry controls though)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Rewes</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/20/phoenix-press-conference-update-proof-of-water-ice/comment-page-1/#comment-24143</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Rewes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15217#comment-24143</guid>
		<description>They just discover the Mediterranean! As if they didn&#039;t know. Water was detected in Europe, and they needed a probe with a lab landing on Mars to do the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They just discover the Mediterranean! As if they didn&#039;t know. Water was detected in Europe, and they needed a probe with a lab landing on Mars to do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/20/phoenix-press-conference-update-proof-of-water-ice/comment-page-1/#comment-24140</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=15217#comment-24140</guid>
		<description>I hold off any preconceived notions until they test it , so until then , I&#039;ll just say I hope this means they&#039;ll eventually send a nuke to level off and reshape Mars&#039; atmosphere then send another one to melt all the ice so Mars can have oceans , because we all know oceans are the pristine source of drinking water.....and that&#039;s how the aliens will wanna go back there</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hold off any preconceived notions until they test it , so until then , I&#039;ll just say I hope this means they&#039;ll eventually send a nuke to level off and reshape Mars&#039; atmosphere then send another one to melt all the ice so Mars can have oceans , because we all know oceans are the pristine source of drinking water&#8230;..and that&#039;s how the aliens will wanna go back there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
