<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Equipment Review:  Meade 8X42 Travel Binoculars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/10/equipment-review-meade-8x42-travel-binoculars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/10/equipment-review-meade-8x42-travel-binoculars/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  8 Nov 2009 08:15:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tammy Plotner</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/10/equipment-review-meade-8x42-travel-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-23354</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammy Plotner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14955#comment-23354</guid>
		<description>rajaee?  Just google in &quot;Meade B120208&quot; and you&#039;ll get various sites to choose from to order a pair.  However....

You might just want to wait a little bit until you hear how competitive versions compare.  Right now there&#039;s two others that are going through the &quot;Ooops.  I left them in the backseat of my car on a hot sunny day test.&quot; and will be handled by 150 different members of the Ohio Military Police tonight at a program.

Ian?  The quintessential &quot;first telescope&quot; will be showing up here soon!  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rajaee?  Just google in &#034;Meade B120208&#034; and you&#039;ll get various sites to choose from to order a pair.  However&#8230;.</p>
<p>You might just want to wait a little bit until you hear how competitive versions compare.  Right now there&#039;s two others that are going through the &#034;Ooops.  I left them in the backseat of my car on a hot sunny day test.&#034; and will be handled by 150 different members of the Ohio Military Police tonight at a program.</p>
<p>Ian?  The quintessential &#034;first telescope&#034; will be showing up here soon!  <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rajaee</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/10/equipment-review-meade-8x42-travel-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-23336</link>
		<dc:creator>rajaee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14955#comment-23336</guid>
		<description>i think that good piece of equipment  ,
 maby you can provide me with the web site i might order one!!!;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that good piece of equipment  ,<br />
 maby you can provide me with the web site i might order one!!!;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/10/equipment-review-meade-8x42-travel-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-23288</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14955#comment-23288</guid>
		<description>I think your reviews are awesome. As a non-astronomer (I know how stars work, but I have no clue where to find them!) you present the product in a balanced review. To be honst, I&#039;m not bothered with apertures, focal lengths, super-duper-non-abberation coatings... I want to know if it works and if it does the job. Plus, you tell us how they cope in the real world :-) When I get my first telescope, the Tammy Test will be the first review I read ;)

Cheers!! Ian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your reviews are awesome. As a non-astronomer (I know how stars work, but I have no clue where to find them!) you present the product in a balanced review. To be honst, I&#039;m not bothered with apertures, focal lengths, super-duper-non-abberation coatings&#8230; I want to know if it works and if it does the job. Plus, you tell us how they cope in the real world <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  When I get my first telescope, the Tammy Test will be the first review I read <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers!! Ian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammy Plotner</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/10/equipment-review-meade-8x42-travel-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-23285</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammy Plotner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14955#comment-23285</guid>
		<description>The &quot;Tammy Test&quot; is realistic.  I don&#039;t go out of my way to ask optical equipment to be rugged - but neither do I wear white gloves when I use it.  This is why you&#039;ll never see a review unless I&#039;ve had it for awhile.  No one wants a telescope that works great for a few weeks and then falls apart...  No more than they want a pair of binoculars that work well until they actually are asked to what they claim.

If no one here feels like I&#039;m playing favourites by telling the honest truth about what lasts and what doesn&#039;t?  I&#039;ll be happy to carry on!

(heheheee...  ian?  it was a comet party and i laid them on top the tire and then forgot they were there when i moved the jeep.  about a year later i was out fishing and went to look for c-bouy and the boat rocked...  i let go to steady myself... and down they went!  that&#039;s why you should always use a neck strap. that way they&#039;ll know where to find your head.  ;))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#034;Tammy Test&#034; is realistic.  I don&#039;t go out of my way to ask optical equipment to be rugged &#8211; but neither do I wear white gloves when I use it.  This is why you&#039;ll never see a review unless I&#039;ve had it for awhile.  No one wants a telescope that works great for a few weeks and then falls apart&#8230;  No more than they want a pair of binoculars that work well until they actually are asked to what they claim.</p>
<p>If no one here feels like I&#039;m playing favourites by telling the honest truth about what lasts and what doesn&#039;t?  I&#039;ll be happy to carry on!</p>
<p>(heheheee&#8230;  ian?  it was a comet party and i laid them on top the tire and then forgot they were there when i moved the jeep.  about a year later i was out fishing and went to look for c-bouy and the boat rocked&#8230;  i let go to steady myself&#8230; and down they went!  that&#039;s why you should always use a neck strap. that way they&#039;ll know where to find your head.  <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/10/equipment-review-meade-8x42-travel-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-23232</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14955#comment-23232</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had binos that were dropped and knocked out of collimation on many occasions. Fortunately these older versions had accessible collimation (tiny) screws on the barrels under the grip surface. I could access them and re-adjust the prisms with a bit of fiddling. Double images were worked back to unison. I&#039;ve saved heaps on doing this myself. But nowadays binoculars are design to prevent you saving money. The collimation screws are nowhere to be seen. Bump them and you&#039;re up for a service collimation job that can cost the same as the binocular itself!

Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve had binos that were dropped and knocked out of collimation on many occasions. Fortunately these older versions had accessible collimation (tiny) screws on the barrels under the grip surface. I could access them and re-adjust the prisms with a bit of fiddling. Double images were worked back to unison. I&#039;ve saved heaps on doing this myself. But nowadays binoculars are design to prevent you saving money. The collimation screws are nowhere to be seen. Bump them and you&#039;re up for a service collimation job that can cost the same as the binocular itself!</p>
<p>Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helio George</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/10/equipment-review-meade-8x42-travel-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-23211</link>
		<dc:creator>Helio George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 03:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14955#comment-23211</guid>
		<description>Thanks Tammy.  Nice to get negative, real-world, accounts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tammy.  Nice to get negative, real-world, accounts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanamonde</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/10/equipment-review-meade-8x42-travel-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-23198</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanamonde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 01:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14955#comment-23198</guid>
		<description>Great review. We seek the truth, be it awful or awesome. Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review. We seek the truth, be it awful or awesome. Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/10/equipment-review-meade-8x42-travel-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-23182</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14955#comment-23182</guid>
		<description>Wow Tammy, I&#039;d hate to be packed in your luggage when you go on holiday! My vision would be impared, I&#039;d be battered by you reversing over me in a 1-ton Jeep and I&#039;d probably end up sleeping with the fishes ;)

Actually.... that sounds like the last stag party I went on...

Just an idea, I reckon these reviews should be called the &quot;Tammy Test&quot; :D

Cheers, Ian :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Tammy, I&#039;d hate to be packed in your luggage when you go on holiday! My vision would be impared, I&#039;d be battered by you reversing over me in a 1-ton Jeep and I&#039;d probably end up sleeping with the fishes <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Actually&#8230;. that sounds like the last stag party I went on&#8230;</p>
<p>Just an idea, I reckon these reviews should be called the &#034;Tammy Test&#034; <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Cheers, Ian <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammy Plotner</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/10/equipment-review-meade-8x42-travel-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-23157</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammy Plotner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14955#comment-23157</guid>
		<description>No worries.  We&#039;re friends.  ;)

So what&#039;s your opinion?  Do you think the collimation should have failed just from having them in a suitcase?  Or from the pressure?

(I had a pair of Tascos once I ran over with a Jeep and they still worked!  I imagine they&#039;re still working at the bottom of the lake where I dropped them from the boat, too...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No worries.  We&#039;re friends.  <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>So what&#039;s your opinion?  Do you think the collimation should have failed just from having them in a suitcase?  Or from the pressure?</p>
<p>(I had a pair of Tascos once I ran over with a Jeep and they still worked!  I imagine they&#039;re still working at the bottom of the lake where I dropped them from the boat, too&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald, Walnut Creek, CA</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/10/equipment-review-meade-8x42-travel-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-23154</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald, Walnut Creek, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14955#comment-23154</guid>
		<description>The above should have been addressed to Tammy, not Ian.  Sorry about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The above should have been addressed to Tammy, not Ian.  Sorry about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald, Walnut Creek, CA</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/10/equipment-review-meade-8x42-travel-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-23152</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald, Walnut Creek, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14955#comment-23152</guid>
		<description>Ian,

About 6 years ago, my wife gave me a pair of Bushnell 8x42 binoculars for my birthday.  They have been the best pair of binoculars I&#039;ve ever owned.  They are lightweight, fully coated, rubberized ... all the plus features you mentioned for the Meade.  The optical quality is superb, and the lightweight and balance make them easy to hold for extended astronomical viewing.  You want rugged?  I&#039;ve been hauling these babies around in a backpack almost every week for years, and have never had any problems.  And I have not been kind to that backpack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian,</p>
<p>About 6 years ago, my wife gave me a pair of Bushnell 8&#215;42 binoculars for my birthday.  They have been the best pair of binoculars I&#039;ve ever owned.  They are lightweight, fully coated, rubberized &#8230; all the plus features you mentioned for the Meade.  The optical quality is superb, and the lightweight and balance make them easy to hold for extended astronomical viewing.  You want rugged?  I&#039;ve been hauling these babies around in a backpack almost every week for years, and have never had any problems.  And I have not been kind to that backpack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammy Plotner</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/10/equipment-review-meade-8x42-travel-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-23134</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammy Plotner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14955#comment-23134</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Ian!  

Your camera sure sounds a lot like my old JVC camcorder - and my IBM ThinkPad.  Dropped.  Kicked.  Scratched.  Sat on. Shipped.  Abused.  Funny thing, though...  They took the licking and kept on ticking.

That&#039;s an excellent observation about air pressure differences.  There may very well be something to that as many astronomy and optical equipment cases have an air pressure purge valve.  But at the same time, I&#039;ve also taken binoculars (ok, dreadfully cheap ones...) along in my suitcase with no problem.

I want very much to be fair with Meade - but the moment I held them I had this gut-awful instinct they wouldn&#039;t take what I put equipment through.  For most people, they&#039;ll more than likely never have a problem with these ultra-light quality binoculars...  But for those of us who drop, throw in the trunk of a car and pile groceries on, shove in a backpack or duffel bag on a whim, give to children to use and generally abuse?  Oh, my...

I think sending back a box of little itty bitty pieces parts might void my warranty.   ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Ian!  </p>
<p>Your camera sure sounds a lot like my old JVC camcorder &#8211; and my IBM ThinkPad.  Dropped.  Kicked.  Scratched.  Sat on. Shipped.  Abused.  Funny thing, though&#8230;  They took the licking and kept on ticking.</p>
<p>That&#039;s an excellent observation about air pressure differences.  There may very well be something to that as many astronomy and optical equipment cases have an air pressure purge valve.  But at the same time, I&#039;ve also taken binoculars (ok, dreadfully cheap ones&#8230;) along in my suitcase with no problem.</p>
<p>I want very much to be fair with Meade &#8211; but the moment I held them I had this gut-awful instinct they wouldn&#039;t take what I put equipment through.  For most people, they&#039;ll more than likely never have a problem with these ultra-light quality binoculars&#8230;  But for those of us who drop, throw in the trunk of a car and pile groceries on, shove in a backpack or duffel bag on a whim, give to children to use and generally abuse?  Oh, my&#8230;</p>
<p>I think sending back a box of little itty bitty pieces parts might void my warranty.   <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/10/equipment-review-meade-8x42-travel-binoculars/comment-page-1/#comment-23129</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14955#comment-23129</guid>
		<description>Oh no! Poor old binoculars. I had a similar thing happen with my ancient Yashica SLR camera. Was forced to pack it in my hold luggage, but wrapped it tight in a tough case and towels. Impregnable? Nope. I was flying with Continental, and someone must have taken a sledgehammer to my bag. I found my beloved SLR inside a buckled case and a defined impression in the metal bodywork. Bless it though, there was no damage to the optics or mechanism and it&#039;s working to this day. 

What can I say? The Japanese sure know how to build a camera! As for Meade, I think I&#039;d have to put their products in my carry on luggage.

Just a thought, do you think the pressure difference when flying can tinker with the inner workings of sensitive optics? I just wonder as it is an airtight compartment between lenses... hmmm...

Great article Tammy, give the 8X42 Travel Binoculars a shake from me (hear a rattle?).

Cheers, Ian ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no! Poor old binoculars. I had a similar thing happen with my ancient Yashica SLR camera. Was forced to pack it in my hold luggage, but wrapped it tight in a tough case and towels. Impregnable? Nope. I was flying with Continental, and someone must have taken a sledgehammer to my bag. I found my beloved SLR inside a buckled case and a defined impression in the metal bodywork. Bless it though, there was no damage to the optics or mechanism and it&#039;s working to this day. </p>
<p>What can I say? The Japanese sure know how to build a camera! As for Meade, I think I&#039;d have to put their products in my carry on luggage.</p>
<p>Just a thought, do you think the pressure difference when flying can tinker with the inner workings of sensitive optics? I just wonder as it is an airtight compartment between lenses&#8230; hmmm&#8230;</p>
<p>Great article Tammy, give the 8X42 Travel Binoculars a shake from me (hear a rattle?).</p>
<p>Cheers, Ian <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
