<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Astronomers Weigh the Coolest Brown Dwarfs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/02/astronomers-weigh-the-coolest-brown-dwarfs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/02/astronomers-weigh-the-coolest-brown-dwarfs/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  8 Nov 2009 10:14:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John M. Kulick</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/02/astronomers-weigh-the-coolest-brown-dwarfs/comment-page-1/#comment-22775</link>
		<dc:creator>John M. Kulick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 21:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14669#comment-22775</guid>
		<description>Another prediction,

The brown dwarfs will be warmer than expected.  Just as Jupiter is warmer than expected. 

(Gravity or its effect decreases with the passage of time, according to my theortical work.  These objects were once stars. and have hotter than expected cores ).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another prediction,</p>
<p>The brown dwarfs will be warmer than expected.  Just as Jupiter is warmer than expected. </p>
<p>(Gravity or its effect decreases with the passage of time, according to my theortical work.  These objects were once stars. and have hotter than expected cores ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dark Gnat</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/02/astronomers-weigh-the-coolest-brown-dwarfs/comment-page-1/#comment-22669</link>
		<dc:creator>Dark Gnat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14669#comment-22669</guid>
		<description>I think we will learn that there are a lot more brown dwarfs and planemos out there than previously thought.

I&#039;m betting brown dwarfs are as common as M-class stars, maybe even more common.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we will learn that there are a lot more brown dwarfs and planemos out there than previously thought.</p>
<p>I&#039;m betting brown dwarfs are as common as M-class stars, maybe even more common.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aodhhan</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/02/astronomers-weigh-the-coolest-brown-dwarfs/comment-page-1/#comment-22649</link>
		<dc:creator>Aodhhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14669#comment-22649</guid>
		<description>Hard to say sometimes just how large something is. Figuring mass is sometimes a lot easier, and something large doesn&#039;t always have a lot of mass.

There is just something deep down inside me, telling me there is a lot more to brown dwarfs than we know or figure. Especially when there are two in close proximity. I understand the theories, yet something still isn&#039;t right. Hopefully some day soon, we will learn a lot more about these objects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to say sometimes just how large something is. Figuring mass is sometimes a lot easier, and something large doesn&#039;t always have a lot of mass.</p>
<p>There is just something deep down inside me, telling me there is a lot more to brown dwarfs than we know or figure. Especially when there are two in close proximity. I understand the theories, yet something still isn&#039;t right. Hopefully some day soon, we will learn a lot more about these objects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dark Gnat</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/02/astronomers-weigh-the-coolest-brown-dwarfs/comment-page-1/#comment-22639</link>
		<dc:creator>Dark Gnat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14669#comment-22639</guid>
		<description>They are probably about the size of Jupiter.  The more massive ones might actually be smaller, due to gravitational compression, and the lack of outward pressure from the fusion process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are probably about the size of Jupiter.  The more massive ones might actually be smaller, due to gravitational compression, and the lack of outward pressure from the fusion process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/02/astronomers-weigh-the-coolest-brown-dwarfs/comment-page-1/#comment-22636</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14669#comment-22636</guid>
		<description>When these Brown Dwarfs are said to be &#039;Small&#039; how small are they - Jupiter sized or something bigger?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When these Brown Dwarfs are said to be &#039;Small&#039; how small are they &#8211; Jupiter sized or something bigger?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/02/astronomers-weigh-the-coolest-brown-dwarfs/comment-page-1/#comment-22619</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 04:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14669#comment-22619</guid>
		<description>So let me get this straight...judging by this method and the results displayed in the article...whatever % the binary system weighs compared to the mass of the sun, they split it down the middle?

Have they not taken into account the wobble in the orbit, or possibly the central point to consider a binary object?

Based on this logic, we could find a binary system like pluto and charon, say that it has a total combined mass of 15% earth and instantly draw a conclusion of 7.5% each without even needing a measurement other than the orbit...Im highly skeptical</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So let me get this straight&#8230;judging by this method and the results displayed in the article&#8230;whatever % the binary system weighs compared to the mass of the sun, they split it down the middle?</p>
<p>Have they not taken into account the wobble in the orbit, or possibly the central point to consider a binary object?</p>
<p>Based on this logic, we could find a binary system like pluto and charon, say that it has a total combined mass of 15% earth and instantly draw a conclusion of 7.5% each without even needing a measurement other than the orbit&#8230;Im highly skeptical</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Glover</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/06/02/astronomers-weigh-the-coolest-brown-dwarfs/comment-page-1/#comment-22586</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Glover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14669#comment-22586</guid>
		<description>So, would these be &#039;light brown&#039; dwarfs...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, would these be &#039;light brown&#039; dwarfs&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
