<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Soyuz Hard Landing: Equipment Module Failed to Separate &#8211; Official</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/22/soyuz-hard-landing-equipment-module-failed-to-separate-official/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/22/soyuz-hard-landing-equipment-module-failed-to-separate-official/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  8 Nov 2009 10:14:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alphonso richardson</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/22/soyuz-hard-landing-equipment-module-failed-to-separate-official/comment-page-1/#comment-21473</link>
		<dc:creator>alphonso richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 11:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14463#comment-21473</guid>
		<description>At last, something approaching a proper explanation, none of this &#039;blame it  on women drivers&#039; stuff that seemed to be coming out at the time

(Admittedly, that may be down to cross-cultural humour not travelling well, but still.........)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At last, something approaching a proper explanation, none of this &#039;blame it  on women drivers&#039; stuff that seemed to be coming out at the time</p>
<p>(Admittedly, that may be down to cross-cultural humour not travelling well, but still&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: von Dawson's Express</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/22/soyuz-hard-landing-equipment-module-failed-to-separate-official/comment-page-1/#comment-21454</link>
		<dc:creator>von Dawson's Express</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 06:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14463#comment-21454</guid>
		<description>This reminds me of the following...

18 January 1969 - Landing of Soyuz 5. Flight of Soyuz 4 and 5. After Shatalov and Yeliseyev transferred to Soyuz 4, Volynov remained behind to live through the most unbelievable re-entry in the history of spaceflight. The service module of the Soyuz failed to separate after retrofire. Once the Soyuz started reaching the tendrils of the atmosphere, the combined spacecraft sought the most aerodynamically stable position - nose forward, with the heavy descent module with its light metal entry hatch at the front, the less dense service module with its flared base to the back. Luckily the struts between the descent and service modules broke off or burned through before the hatch melted through and the descent module righted itself, with the heat shield to the rear, before being consumed. Due to a failure of the soft-landing rockets the landing was harder than usual and Volynov broke his teeth.

Have a look a www.astronautix.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of the following&#8230;</p>
<p>18 January 1969 &#8211; Landing of Soyuz 5. Flight of Soyuz 4 and 5. After Shatalov and Yeliseyev transferred to Soyuz 4, Volynov remained behind to live through the most unbelievable re-entry in the history of spaceflight. The service module of the Soyuz failed to separate after retrofire. Once the Soyuz started reaching the tendrils of the atmosphere, the combined spacecraft sought the most aerodynamically stable position &#8211; nose forward, with the heavy descent module with its light metal entry hatch at the front, the less dense service module with its flared base to the back. Luckily the struts between the descent and service modules broke off or burned through before the hatch melted through and the descent module righted itself, with the heat shield to the rear, before being consumed. Due to a failure of the soft-landing rockets the landing was harder than usual and Volynov broke his teeth.</p>
<p>Have a look a <a href="http://www.astronautix.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.astronautix.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gibsy</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/22/soyuz-hard-landing-equipment-module-failed-to-separate-official/comment-page-1/#comment-21435</link>
		<dc:creator>gibsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 02:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14463#comment-21435</guid>
		<description>Posted this link in www.surfurls.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted this link in <a href="http://www.surfurls.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.surfurls.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/22/soyuz-hard-landing-equipment-module-failed-to-separate-official/comment-page-1/#comment-21383</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 21:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14463#comment-21383</guid>
		<description>Good point Ryan, I &lt;em&gt;believe&lt;/em&gt; that the &quot;equipment module&quot; is the same as the instrumentation/propulsion module. Looking over the previous reports it looks like this is the case. 

Cheers! Ian :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Ryan, I <em>believe</em> that the &#034;equipment module&#034; is the same as the instrumentation/propulsion module. Looking over the previous reports it looks like this is the case. </p>
<p>Cheers! Ian <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Burns</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/22/soyuz-hard-landing-equipment-module-failed-to-separate-official/comment-page-1/#comment-21382</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 21:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14463#comment-21382</guid>
		<description>Is the equipment module the same as the service module?  None of the modules mentioned in the diagram have the same name as the module in the text.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the equipment module the same as the service module?  None of the modules mentioned in the diagram have the same name as the module in the text.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
