<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solar Sonic Boom: Eclipses May Generate Atmospheric Shocks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/22/solar-sonic-boom-eclipses-may-generate-atmospheric-shocks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/22/solar-sonic-boom-eclipses-may-generate-atmospheric-shocks/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:56:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Eves</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/22/solar-sonic-boom-eclipses-may-generate-atmospheric-shocks/comment-page-1/#comment-22584</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Eves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14435#comment-22584</guid>
		<description>The Foulault pendulum behaviour was described in a New Scientist cover story, entitled &quot;Einstein Eclipsed&quot;, which was published in November 2004. That article proposes a gravitational explanation of the phenomenon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Foulault pendulum behaviour was described in a New Scientist cover story, entitled &#034;Einstein Eclipsed&#034;, which was published in November 2004. That article proposes a gravitational explanation of the phenomenon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/22/solar-sonic-boom-eclipses-may-generate-atmospheric-shocks/comment-page-1/#comment-22050</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 11:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14435#comment-22050</guid>
		<description>I like the infrasound idea. I have been sensitive to it in the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the infrasound idea. I have been sensitive to it in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Mendenhall</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/22/solar-sonic-boom-eclipses-may-generate-atmospheric-shocks/comment-page-1/#comment-21509</link>
		<dc:creator>John Mendenhall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 20:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14435#comment-21509</guid>
		<description>Could you please give a reference for the claim about Foucault pendulums?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you please give a reference for the claim about Foucault pendulums?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrofiend</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/22/solar-sonic-boom-eclipses-may-generate-atmospheric-shocks/comment-page-1/#comment-21402</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrofiend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14435#comment-21402</guid>
		<description>Sounds reasonable. Let&#039;s get some weather balloons or sounding rockets up there and see!

Also sounds like a good explanation for the Foucault pendulum phenomenon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds reasonable. Let&#039;s get some weather balloons or sounding rockets up there and see!</p>
<p>Also sounds like a good explanation for the Foucault pendulum phenomenon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/22/solar-sonic-boom-eclipses-may-generate-atmospheric-shocks/comment-page-1/#comment-21381</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 21:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14435#comment-21381</guid>
		<description>Hi Daniel. Actually, there has been some confusion surrounding the bands as the previous research only explains one aspect of the phenomenon. The next step would be to find a way to measure the infrasound possibly generated during the next eclipse. This is what science is all about, don&#039;t go discounting this new theory quite yet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Daniel. Actually, there has been some confusion surrounding the bands as the previous research only explains one aspect of the phenomenon. The next step would be to find a way to measure the infrasound possibly generated during the next eclipse. This is what science is all about, don&#039;t go discounting this new theory quite yet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Fischer</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/22/solar-sonic-boom-eclipses-may-generate-atmospheric-shocks/comment-page-1/#comment-21345</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Fischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14435#comment-21345</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately the paper the BBC story is based on is hard to track down, but on the Solar Eclipse Mailing List the new work isn&#039;t taken serious very much anyway - because the shadow band phenomenon was already &lt;a href=&quot;http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1986A%26A...164..415C&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;explained in 1986&lt;/a&gt; to most everyone&#039;s satisfaction. It is certainly not &quot;mysterious&quot; as the BBC writer claims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately the paper the BBC story is based on is hard to track down, but on the Solar Eclipse Mailing List the new work isn&#039;t taken serious very much anyway &#8211; because the shadow band phenomenon was already <a href="http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1986A%26A...164..415C" rel="nofollow">explained in 1986</a> to most everyone&#039;s satisfaction. It is certainly not &#034;mysterious&#034; as the BBC writer claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miguel V.</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/22/solar-sonic-boom-eclipses-may-generate-atmospheric-shocks/comment-page-1/#comment-21322</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14435#comment-21322</guid>
		<description>Interesting and relatively easy to test in the next solar eclipse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting and relatively easy to test in the next solar eclipse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hex</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/22/solar-sonic-boom-eclipses-may-generate-atmospheric-shocks/comment-page-1/#comment-21320</link>
		<dc:creator>Hex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 15:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14435#comment-21320</guid>
		<description>Try again...The moon is acting as a gravitational lens of the sun, harmonizing the atmosphere with waves of space/time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try again&#8230;The moon is acting as a gravitational lens of the sun, harmonizing the atmosphere with waves of space/time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
