<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NASA Flips for Petaflops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/08/nasa-flips-for-petaflops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/08/nasa-flips-for-petaflops/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:07:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/08/nasa-flips-for-petaflops/comment-page-1/#comment-20062</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 17:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14175#comment-20062</guid>
		<description>Does this mean they`ll be able to run Vista?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean they`ll be able to run Vista?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Lam</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/08/nasa-flips-for-petaflops/comment-page-1/#comment-20020</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Lam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 12:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14175#comment-20020</guid>
		<description>To Laszio,  Excellant questions.  Does anyone know who or how answers are checked?  Petaflop production vs. accuracy?  That could be a gut-wrenching expose`.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Laszio,  Excellant questions.  Does anyone know who or how answers are checked?  Petaflop production vs. accuracy?  That could be a gut-wrenching expose`.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alphonso richardson</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/08/nasa-flips-for-petaflops/comment-page-1/#comment-19990</link>
		<dc:creator>alphonso richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 08:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14175#comment-19990</guid>
		<description>I bet &#039;Gears of War&#039; loads &amp; plays like a good &#039;un!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet &#039;Gears of War&#039; loads &amp; plays like a good &#039;un!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laszlo</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/05/08/nasa-flips-for-petaflops/comment-page-1/#comment-19964</link>
		<dc:creator>Laszlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 23:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=14175#comment-19964</guid>
		<description>What about the fidelity of these calculations? Does anyone ever check the computer&#039;s answers? What about the parameters programmed into the software, can the paradigm accurately simulate nature? Models, after all, help, us grasp complex topics by over simplification. Maybe the strength of Quantum&#039;s in open-ended questions. Instead of determinism, nature may be probability &amp; statistical mechanics. Roll the Petra-Dice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the fidelity of these calculations? Does anyone ever check the computer&#039;s answers? What about the parameters programmed into the software, can the paradigm accurately simulate nature? Models, after all, help, us grasp complex topics by over simplification. Maybe the strength of Quantum&#039;s in open-ended questions. Instead of determinism, nature may be probability &amp; statistical mechanics. Roll the Petra-Dice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
