<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Magnetic Fields Shape the Jets Pouring Out of Supermassive Black Holes (with video)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/23/magnetic-fields-shape-the-jets-pouring-out-of-supermassive-black-holes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/23/magnetic-fields-shape-the-jets-pouring-out-of-supermassive-black-holes/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  8 Nov 2009 12:45:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Qev</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/23/magnetic-fields-shape-the-jets-pouring-out-of-supermassive-black-holes/comment-page-1/#comment-19001</link>
		<dc:creator>Qev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13841#comment-19001</guid>
		<description>Accretion disks form because collisions between the particles making up a spherical cloud of gas or dust tend to average out their angular momentum.  This causes the cloud to collapse into a disk, where the orbits of the particles don&#039;t cross, minimizing the number of collisions.  The rotation of the primary also plays a role, tending to align the disk with its own equator (I haven&#039;t quite figured out the &#039;how&#039; of that last part, yet.  It&#039;s something to do with the oblateness of rotating bodies).

Also, the matter of the disk, as it falls into the black hole, transfers its angular momentum to the hole, which also helps to align the hole&#039;s equator with the accretion disk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Accretion disks form because collisions between the particles making up a spherical cloud of gas or dust tend to average out their angular momentum.  This causes the cloud to collapse into a disk, where the orbits of the particles don&#039;t cross, minimizing the number of collisions.  The rotation of the primary also plays a role, tending to align the disk with its own equator (I haven&#039;t quite figured out the &#039;how&#039; of that last part, yet.  It&#039;s something to do with the oblateness of rotating bodies).</p>
<p>Also, the matter of the disk, as it falls into the black hole, transfers its angular momentum to the hole, which also helps to align the hole&#039;s equator with the accretion disk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LLDIAZ</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/23/magnetic-fields-shape-the-jets-pouring-out-of-supermassive-black-holes/comment-page-1/#comment-19000</link>
		<dc:creator>LLDIAZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13841#comment-19000</guid>
		<description>gotcha !!
nice example!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gotcha !!<br />
nice example!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dark Gnat</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/23/magnetic-fields-shape-the-jets-pouring-out-of-supermassive-black-holes/comment-page-1/#comment-18968</link>
		<dc:creator>Dark Gnat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13841#comment-18968</guid>
		<description>Tajadar: I&#039;m not 100% certain of this, but I think it been predicted that all black holes spin. In mathematical models, it&#039;s possible to have a non-rotating black hole, but in reality, they all rotate.

LLDIAZ: As for mass: Think of a lead bar that weighs 100 pounds.  Then think of a pile of feathers that weighs 100 pounds.  They both weigh the same, but the feather pile is much bigger.  Same thing with a black hole.  Black holes have a lot of mass in a small size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tajadar: I&#039;m not 100% certain of this, but I think it been predicted that all black holes spin. In mathematical models, it&#039;s possible to have a non-rotating black hole, but in reality, they all rotate.</p>
<p>LLDIAZ: As for mass: Think of a lead bar that weighs 100 pounds.  Then think of a pile of feathers that weighs 100 pounds.  They both weigh the same, but the feather pile is much bigger.  Same thing with a black hole.  Black holes have a lot of mass in a small size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tajdar</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/23/magnetic-fields-shape-the-jets-pouring-out-of-supermassive-black-holes/comment-page-1/#comment-18953</link>
		<dc:creator>Tajdar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13841#comment-18953</guid>
		<description>I am unable to convince myself with the question how the accretion disk is formed. Whatever is written can be possible only for blackholes with some rotation. I dont know how, if possible, it makes any sense if the blackhole is not spinning and the disk is formed. If it is possible, somebody tell me how.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am unable to convince myself with the question how the accretion disk is formed. Whatever is written can be possible only for blackholes with some rotation. I dont know how, if possible, it makes any sense if the blackhole is not spinning and the disk is formed. If it is possible, somebody tell me how.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alphonso richardson</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/23/magnetic-fields-shape-the-jets-pouring-out-of-supermassive-black-holes/comment-page-1/#comment-18951</link>
		<dc:creator>alphonso richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13841#comment-18951</guid>
		<description>beautiful animation. Top one, people!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>beautiful animation. Top one, people!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/23/magnetic-fields-shape-the-jets-pouring-out-of-supermassive-black-holes/comment-page-1/#comment-18920</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13841#comment-18920</guid>
		<description>It is possible if you think about it.  The singularity itself is almost infinitely small.  (The word infinite is important here)  so we are dealing with an object that does have the power to prove E=mc^2.  the jets that exit the &quot;Hole&quot; have already had incredible forces and energies in the mix.  The theory is that matter is reduced to sub-atomic particles, and we believe that this occurs in the accretion disk.  The energy released when you break a nuclear bond is huge.  Throw in gravitational and magnetic forces on top of that, and it is plausible that this can and does occur.  Einstein wasn&#039;t wrong, he just hasn&#039;t been proven &quot;Right&quot; enough yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is possible if you think about it.  The singularity itself is almost infinitely small.  (The word infinite is important here)  so we are dealing with an object that does have the power to prove E=mc^2.  the jets that exit the &#034;Hole&#034; have already had incredible forces and energies in the mix.  The theory is that matter is reduced to sub-atomic particles, and we believe that this occurs in the accretion disk.  The energy released when you break a nuclear bond is huge.  Throw in gravitational and magnetic forces on top of that, and it is plausible that this can and does occur.  Einstein wasn&#039;t wrong, he just hasn&#039;t been proven &#034;Right&#034; enough yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrofiend</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/23/magnetic-fields-shape-the-jets-pouring-out-of-supermassive-black-holes/comment-page-1/#comment-18913</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrofiend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13841#comment-18913</guid>
		<description>Damn! Post lost twice! Check out wikipedia LLDIAZ. Look up mass and volume on there... I wrote a post but it doesn&#039;t seem to want to log it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn! Post lost twice! Check out wikipedia LLDIAZ. Look up mass and volume on there&#8230; I wrote a post but it doesn&#039;t seem to want to log it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrofiend</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/23/magnetic-fields-shape-the-jets-pouring-out-of-supermassive-black-holes/comment-page-1/#comment-18912</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrofiend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13841#comment-18912</guid>
		<description>Nooooo! post lost twice!

Check out this article LLDIAZ, it may answer some of your questions:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nooooo! post lost twice!</p>
<p>Check out this article LLDIAZ, it may answer some of your questions:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrofiend</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/23/magnetic-fields-shape-the-jets-pouring-out-of-supermassive-black-holes/comment-page-1/#comment-18911</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrofiend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13841#comment-18911</guid>
		<description>Hmmm apologies if posted twice, computer tripping out? Frustrating!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm apologies if posted twice, computer tripping out? Frustrating!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrofiend</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/23/magnetic-fields-shape-the-jets-pouring-out-of-supermassive-black-holes/comment-page-1/#comment-18910</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrofiend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13841#comment-18910</guid>
		<description>Hi LLDIAZ,

Size and mass are different quantities, but the difference can be intuitively confusing, as we tend to naturally use the size of an object as an indicator of it&#039;s mass quite naturally here on Earth.

Size is the physical extent of an object. You can describe it with more specific terms such as width, height, thickness, volume etc. Size is a bit of a general term.

Mass is the measure of how much matter an object contains. Intuitively, a heavier object contains more mass that a lighter object, etc. It is measured in Kilograms in the metric system. 

The two quantities are related by density. A large object containing not much mass is regarded as relatively less dense (such as a balloon filled with air) than an object that is smaller and contains more mass (such as a block of lead).

And so we come to black holes - these are the densest objects in the universe, containing many stars worth of material crammed into a very small space by a phenomenon known as gravitational collapse. Check out this article if you feel like reading further:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi LLDIAZ,</p>
<p>Size and mass are different quantities, but the difference can be intuitively confusing, as we tend to naturally use the size of an object as an indicator of it&#039;s mass quite naturally here on Earth.</p>
<p>Size is the physical extent of an object. You can describe it with more specific terms such as width, height, thickness, volume etc. Size is a bit of a general term.</p>
<p>Mass is the measure of how much matter an object contains. Intuitively, a heavier object contains more mass that a lighter object, etc. It is measured in Kilograms in the metric system. </p>
<p>The two quantities are related by density. A large object containing not much mass is regarded as relatively less dense (such as a balloon filled with air) than an object that is smaller and contains more mass (such as a block of lead).</p>
<p>And so we come to black holes &#8211; these are the densest objects in the universe, containing many stars worth of material crammed into a very small space by a phenomenon known as gravitational collapse. Check out this article if you feel like reading further:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LLDIAZ</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/23/magnetic-fields-shape-the-jets-pouring-out-of-supermassive-black-holes/comment-page-1/#comment-18897</link>
		<dc:creator>LLDIAZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13841#comment-18897</guid>
		<description>Whats the difference between mass and size. When they say it has the mass of 1 million suns but is only the size of earth that confuses me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whats the difference between mass and size. When they say it has the mass of 1 million suns but is only the size of earth that confuses me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UNdistinguished</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/23/magnetic-fields-shape-the-jets-pouring-out-of-supermassive-black-holes/comment-page-1/#comment-18892</link>
		<dc:creator>UNdistinguished</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 13:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13841#comment-18892</guid>
		<description>&quot;...at the speed of light...&quot;  Really?  So, does the magnetic fields have the energy of all the universe?  Is Einstein wrong about the amount of energy needed to move matter at the speed of light?  Let me know because I have an idea for rapid trasnit that will make me a billion-aire.  Maybe it really doesn&#039;t eject in-falling matter &quot;at the speed of light.&quot;  Perhaps 99.99% of the speed - maybe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;&#8230;at the speed of light&#8230;&#034;  Really?  So, does the magnetic fields have the energy of all the universe?  Is Einstein wrong about the amount of energy needed to move matter at the speed of light?  Let me know because I have an idea for rapid trasnit that will make me a billion-aire.  Maybe it really doesn&#039;t eject in-falling matter &#034;at the speed of light.&#034;  Perhaps 99.99% of the speed &#8211; maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dark Gnat</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/23/magnetic-fields-shape-the-jets-pouring-out-of-supermassive-black-holes/comment-page-1/#comment-18890</link>
		<dc:creator>Dark Gnat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13841#comment-18890</guid>
		<description>The material is forced out before it reaches the event horizon.  Once material goes past the event horizon, there is no escape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The material is forced out before it reaches the event horizon.  Once material goes past the event horizon, there is no escape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron G</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/23/magnetic-fields-shape-the-jets-pouring-out-of-supermassive-black-holes/comment-page-1/#comment-18887</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13841#comment-18887</guid>
		<description>You stated, &quot;From this extreme environment, the black hole-powered region spews out powerful jets of particles moving at the speed of light.&quot;  I don&#039;t understand - if nothing, not even light can escape a black hole, how does one explain this observation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You stated, &#034;From this extreme environment, the black hole-powered region spews out powerful jets of particles moving at the speed of light.&#034;  I don&#039;t understand &#8211; if nothing, not even light can escape a black hole, how does one explain this observation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jad Kanounji</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/23/magnetic-fields-shape-the-jets-pouring-out-of-supermassive-black-holes/comment-page-1/#comment-18878</link>
		<dc:creator>Jad Kanounji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13841#comment-18878</guid>
		<description>....beautiful</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.beautiful</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
