<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Itâ€™s That Time of the Month for the Moon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/21/its-that-time-of-the-month-for-the-moon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/21/its-that-time-of-the-month-for-the-moon/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  8 Nov 2009 10:14:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vanamonde</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/21/its-that-time-of-the-month-for-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-18744</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanamonde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13787#comment-18744</guid>
		<description>&#039;as no one has been on the moon during this time. &quot;Apollo astronauts never landed on a full Moon and they never experienced the magnetotail.&quot;&#039;

I am guessing NASA planned it that way - they had enough radiation exposure and other new weirdness to worry about on this initial trips.

This is new to me and very weird...and cool. Thanks!

That title is a bit tacky, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#039;as no one has been on the moon during this time. &#034;Apollo astronauts never landed on a full Moon and they never experienced the magnetotail.&#034;&#039;</p>
<p>I am guessing NASA planned it that way &#8211; they had enough radiation exposure and other new weirdness to worry about on this initial trips.</p>
<p>This is new to me and very weird&#8230;and cool. Thanks!</p>
<p>That title is a bit tacky, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthias</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/21/its-that-time-of-the-month-for-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-18692</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13787#comment-18692</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t quite get my head around this: for there to be a zap, the charge has to go somewhere. But since everything within the next thousand kilometers or so is equally charged or vacuum, there is no difference in potential. I think.

The floating dust on the other hand could be a nice viewâ€¦ until it scratches your faceplate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#039;t quite get my head around this: for there to be a zap, the charge has to go somewhere. But since everything within the next thousand kilometers or so is equally charged or vacuum, there is no difference in potential. I think.</p>
<p>The floating dust on the other hand could be a nice viewâ€¦ until it scratches your faceplate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
