<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Binoculars for Astronomy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:07:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bargain digital cameras</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-2/#comment-61532</link>
		<dc:creator>bargain digital cameras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 01:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-61532</guid>
		<description>Haha ^^ nice, is there a section to follow the RSS feed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha ^^ nice, is there a section to follow the RSS feed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-2/#comment-47576</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 00:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-47576</guid>
		<description>Celestron binoculars are the best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Celestron binoculars are the best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Baumann</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-2/#comment-39344</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Baumann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 20:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-39344</guid>
		<description>Whoops ...my bad... Barska does indeed sell a 9x63 roof prism for astronomy. Seems they use &quot;blackhawk&quot; for a whole series, not just one model. Must learn to read. 
Still...compare the specs carefully, and read the reviews to see if Celestron and Orion can justify the higher prices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops &#8230;my bad&#8230; Barska does indeed sell a 9&#215;63 roof prism for astronomy. Seems they use &#034;blackhawk&#034; for a whole series, not just one model. Must learn to read.<br />
Still&#8230;compare the specs carefully, and read the reviews to see if Celestron and Orion can justify the higher prices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Baumann</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-2/#comment-39343</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Baumann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 20:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-39343</guid>
		<description>Hi Ty...Just looking at your question and if you look back at the higher priced &quot;astro&quot; binoculars you will notice that they have much larger lenses, hence the higher prices. The Barska&#039;s have a 43 mm lens compared to Celestron&#039;s 72023  63 mm lens. Bigger lens, brighter image, more to see! 

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ty&#8230;Just looking at your question and if you look back at the higher priced &#034;astro&#034; binoculars you will notice that they have much larger lenses, hence the higher prices. The Barska&#039;s have a 43 mm lens compared to Celestron&#039;s 72023  63 mm lens. Bigger lens, brighter image, more to see! </p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammy Plotner</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-2/#comment-36557</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammy Plotner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-36557</guid>
		<description>oh!  ps....  you don&#039;t want to use roof prism binoculars for asto applications, either.  they also dim the image.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh!  ps&#8230;.  you don&#039;t want to use roof prism binoculars for asto applications, either.  they also dim the image.  <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammy Plotner</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-2/#comment-36556</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammy Plotner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-36556</guid>
		<description>hi, ty!

i just happened to notice you&#039;d replied to this topic.  there&#039;s nothing wrong with the barska blackhawks except for they are coated for daytime observing and not for night.  if you&#039;re a bird watcher, these are fine.  but if you&#039;re primarily interested in using them for astronomy, the coatings will dim the starlight considerably because they were meant to reduce daytime glare.

hope this helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi, ty!</p>
<p>i just happened to notice you&#039;d replied to this topic.  there&#039;s nothing wrong with the barska blackhawks except for they are coated for daytime observing and not for night.  if you&#039;re a bird watcher, these are fine.  but if you&#039;re primarily interested in using them for astronomy, the coatings will dim the starlight considerably because they were meant to reduce daytime glare.</p>
<p>hope this helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: faeze chaghajerdi</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-2/#comment-25010</link>
		<dc:creator>faeze chaghajerdi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 06:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-25010</guid>
		<description>hello every one!
we all know that binoculars are great for observing even if you have a telescope you sometimes take a pair of them to observe the night sky.now i have my 20*90 binoculars...they are very nice and i love them so much...
good luck...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello every one!<br />
we all know that binoculars are great for observing even if you have a telescope you sometimes take a pair of them to observe the night sky.now i have my 20*90 binoculars&#8230;they are very nice and i love them so much&#8230;<br />
good luck&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ty Little</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-2/#comment-23487</link>
		<dc:creator>Ty Little</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-23487</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m looking to get started in the best way so I&#039;ve decided to purchase a &quot;double telescope&quot;. I am comparing these 9X63 found at Amazon.com.  They are:

PORRO
Celestron 72023 Skymaster ($300)
Orion Mini Giant ($200)
ROOF
Meade Astro ($120)
Barska Blackhawk ($90)
Tasco Low Light ($150)

Can someone explain why I shouldn&#039;t buy the Barska Blackhawk?  Are the Celestron and Orion worth that much more, and why?  I&#039;m an amateur.  Be nice.  And thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m looking to get started in the best way so I&#039;ve decided to purchase a &#034;double telescope&#034;. I am comparing these 9X63 found at Amazon.com.  They are:</p>
<p>PORRO<br />
Celestron 72023 Skymaster ($300)<br />
Orion Mini Giant ($200)<br />
ROOF<br />
Meade Astro ($120)<br />
Barska Blackhawk ($90)<br />
Tasco Low Light ($150)</p>
<p>Can someone explain why I shouldn&#039;t buy the Barska Blackhawk?  Are the Celestron and Orion worth that much more, and why?  I&#039;m an amateur.  Be nice.  And thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cecilia</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-2/#comment-23384</link>
		<dc:creator>cecilia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-23384</guid>
		<description>How would you combine lenses if you wanted to magnify 100X?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would you combine lenses if you wanted to magnify 100X?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-22623</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 07:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-22623</guid>
		<description>hey just one questionn how does light behave when it travels through binoculars to your eye??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey just one questionn how does light behave when it travels through binoculars to your eye??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wix</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-20776</link>
		<dc:creator>wix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 01:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-20776</guid>
		<description>can i see saturns ring thru a 7x50? or 10x50?

im a newbie in astronomy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can i see saturns ring thru a 7&#215;50? or 10&#215;50?</p>
<p>im a newbie in astronomy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammy Plotner</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-19916</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammy Plotner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-19916</guid>
		<description>Hello!

I periodically check back for questions, so please pardon the delay.  

Yes, ruby lenses and ruby coated mean essentially the same thing... But these are &lt;b&gt;NOT&lt;/b&gt; good coatings for astronomical binoculars.  Ruby coatings were meant for daytime applications to reduce glare and will significantly destroy the light from astronomy targets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello!</p>
<p>I periodically check back for questions, so please pardon the delay.  </p>
<p>Yes, ruby lenses and ruby coated mean essentially the same thing&#8230; But these are <b>NOT</b> good coatings for astronomical binoculars.  Ruby coatings were meant for daytime applications to reduce glare and will significantly destroy the light from astronomy targets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buy Binoculars</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-19416</link>
		<dc:creator>Buy Binoculars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 22:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-19416</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve found that 8x42 binoculars are great for all around use, and I would strongly recommend them for someone new to binoculars. For astronomy, stronger magnification level binoculars may be more appropriate, but you may need a tripod unless the objective lens is quite large, which can get expensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve found that 8&#215;42 binoculars are great for all around use, and I would strongly recommend them for someone new to binoculars. For astronomy, stronger magnification level binoculars may be more appropriate, but you may need a tripod unless the objective lens is quite large, which can get expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Knew</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-18800</link>
		<dc:creator>New Knew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 06:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-18800</guid>
		<description>Are &quot;ruby lenses&quot; the same as &quot;ruby coated lenses?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are &#034;ruby lenses&#034; the same as &#034;ruby coated lenses?&#034;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-18322</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-18322</guid>
		<description>I bet 100 bucks that this post was written because wordtracker showed that it was a popular search term! Good SEO anyway ... ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet 100 bucks that this post was written because wordtracker showed that it was a popular search term! Good SEO anyway &#8230; <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RapidEye</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-18316</link>
		<dc:creator>RapidEye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-18316</guid>
		<description>I LOVE my Orion UltraView 10x50&#039;s Great Eye Relief and good Wide Field: best $125 spent on Astronomy Gear =-)

Mars is the wrong object to view with binox - you need well over 100x to see much of  anything on Mars (on a great night).
For Binox, sweep the Milky Way in Cygnus or Cassiopia on a cool fall night - you&#039;ll soon be lost....

Another great UT article - Thanks Guys!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVE my Orion UltraView 10&#215;50&#039;s Great Eye Relief and good Wide Field: best $125 spent on Astronomy Gear =-)</p>
<p>Mars is the wrong object to view with binox &#8211; you need well over 100x to see much of  anything on Mars (on a great night).<br />
For Binox, sweep the Milky Way in Cygnus or Cassiopia on a cool fall night &#8211; you&#039;ll soon be lost&#8230;.</p>
<p>Another great UT article &#8211; Thanks Guys!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammy Plotner</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-18313</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammy Plotner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-18313</guid>
		<description>All the binoculars mentioned here are excellent quality.  I simply cannot say enough good things about Mr. Busarow and the Oberwerk family of binoculars!  Wanna&#039; get blown away?  Look through one of the giant pairs of Oberwerks!

Nikon, Cannon, Bushnell, Celestron, Meade, Orion, Leica, Ziess... these are all ones you will never be dis-satisfied with.  (and i&#039;m sure there&#039;s a lot more names i haven&#039;t mentioned!)  Quite honestly, I&#039;ve even picked up a pair or two that I knew were low quality and still liked them.  The ones mentioned in the article were chosen because I know they&#039;re the highest quality at the lowest possible price.  Just be careful of ones that you can&#039;t examine personally.  It&#039;s perfectly safe to order binoculars from an internet site, but make sure you pick a reputable dealer that carries quality brands.

As for imaging with binoculars...  Wow.   That&#039;s a tough question.  In this case, all I can do is answer from my own personal experience and invite other readers to share theirs.

I have a pair of digital imaging binoculars.  When I got them, I was thrilled!  At last... Now I could take some great sky shots, like Venus and the crescent Moon, you know?  Guess what...  Yep.  It doesn&#039;t work that way.  If I want to take a picture of my german shepherd digging a hole in the back 40?  Perfect!  But not for even the most bright astronomy applications.

But... I&#039;m also not one to give up.  (and this is going to get weird, ok?)

I&#039;ve tried experimenting with photography afocally with binos.  (don&#039;t eat me for breakfast, astrophotographers!  i&#039;m a writer... not a shootist!)  If I remember correctly, afocally is the right word for what I did...  adjust the focus with my glasses on for 20/20 vision, mated my digital camera lens to one side and took aim with the other.  Did it work?  Darn right it did.  I&#039;ve got nice images of the Moon, and bright little dots that at least I know are Saturn, Jupiter and Venus.

Now... Do the same thing with a camcorder!  Only this time, you can even finer tune the focus by watching what you see on the flip side screen.  Again...  Really, really nice pictures of the Moon.  It&#039;s not Theirry LeGault&#039;s work, but I was delighted!  (pssst...  an ordinary webcam works, too!)

The bottom line is, if it&#039;s not bright - it&#039;s not going to show up on film without a timed exposure and rock steady mounting.  If you want to do something on that order, consider getting a spotting scope!  Almost all of them come with at least a tabletop mount and quite a few have removable lenses so you can even mount the camera right on them.

Hope this helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the binoculars mentioned here are excellent quality.  I simply cannot say enough good things about Mr. Busarow and the Oberwerk family of binoculars!  Wanna&#039; get blown away?  Look through one of the giant pairs of Oberwerks!</p>
<p>Nikon, Cannon, Bushnell, Celestron, Meade, Orion, Leica, Ziess&#8230; these are all ones you will never be dis-satisfied with.  (and i&#039;m sure there&#039;s a lot more names i haven&#039;t mentioned!)  Quite honestly, I&#039;ve even picked up a pair or two that I knew were low quality and still liked them.  The ones mentioned in the article were chosen because I know they&#039;re the highest quality at the lowest possible price.  Just be careful of ones that you can&#039;t examine personally.  It&#039;s perfectly safe to order binoculars from an internet site, but make sure you pick a reputable dealer that carries quality brands.</p>
<p>As for imaging with binoculars&#8230;  Wow.   That&#039;s a tough question.  In this case, all I can do is answer from my own personal experience and invite other readers to share theirs.</p>
<p>I have a pair of digital imaging binoculars.  When I got them, I was thrilled!  At last&#8230; Now I could take some great sky shots, like Venus and the crescent Moon, you know?  Guess what&#8230;  Yep.  It doesn&#039;t work that way.  If I want to take a picture of my german shepherd digging a hole in the back 40?  Perfect!  But not for even the most bright astronomy applications.</p>
<p>But&#8230; I&#039;m also not one to give up.  (and this is going to get weird, ok?)</p>
<p>I&#039;ve tried experimenting with photography afocally with binos.  (don&#039;t eat me for breakfast, astrophotographers!  i&#039;m a writer&#8230; not a shootist!)  If I remember correctly, afocally is the right word for what I did&#8230;  adjust the focus with my glasses on for 20/20 vision, mated my digital camera lens to one side and took aim with the other.  Did it work?  Darn right it did.  I&#039;ve got nice images of the Moon, and bright little dots that at least I know are Saturn, Jupiter and Venus.</p>
<p>Now&#8230; Do the same thing with a camcorder!  Only this time, you can even finer tune the focus by watching what you see on the flip side screen.  Again&#8230;  Really, really nice pictures of the Moon.  It&#039;s not Theirry LeGault&#039;s work, but I was delighted!  (pssst&#8230;  an ordinary webcam works, too!)</p>
<p>The bottom line is, if it&#039;s not bright &#8211; it&#039;s not going to show up on film without a timed exposure and rock steady mounting.  If you want to do something on that order, consider getting a spotting scope!  Almost all of them come with at least a tabletop mount and quite a few have removable lenses so you can even mount the camera right on them.</p>
<p>Hope this helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Talal</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-18286</link>
		<dc:creator>Talal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-18286</guid>
		<description>What about Oberwerk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Oberwerk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liede-Marie</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-18284</link>
		<dc:creator>Liede-Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-18284</guid>
		<description>Your article on binoculars is very good. I belong to a local Astronomy club and I use binoculars constantly when we have our Outreach programs whether up on Mt. Diablo (Contra Costa County, CA) or at school programs. Many people have binoculars but they never think of them as something to use for looking up at the stars, planets, etc. After seeing the Moon and the Orion Nebula they think differently about them. A lot of families have scopes and have no idea how to use them so they are put away never to be looked at again so I tell them to take out their binoculars (if they have them) and &quot;look up&quot;. I have several sizes including the 25x100 but they are so heavy that I don&#039;t use them that much, I also had to purchase a stronger tripod just to hold them; I use my 15x70 and 10x50 binoculars all the time. I tell people to buy a pair to enjoy the night sky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article on binoculars is very good. I belong to a local Astronomy club and I use binoculars constantly when we have our Outreach programs whether up on Mt. Diablo (Contra Costa County, CA) or at school programs. Many people have binoculars but they never think of them as something to use for looking up at the stars, planets, etc. After seeing the Moon and the Orion Nebula they think differently about them. A lot of families have scopes and have no idea how to use them so they are put away never to be looked at again so I tell them to take out their binoculars (if they have them) and &#034;look up&#034;. I have several sizes including the 25&#215;100 but they are so heavy that I don&#039;t use them that much, I also had to purchase a stronger tripod just to hold them; I use my 15&#215;70 and 10&#215;50 binoculars all the time. I tell people to buy a pair to enjoy the night sky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammy Plotner</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-18279</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammy Plotner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-18279</guid>
		<description>No tripod?  No problem.  I am going to give you a trick of the trade you&#039;re going to love!  All it requires is either a broomstick, or one of those painter&#039;s extension handles that screws together in sections.  What we&#039;re going to make is called a finn stick!

Holding binoculars steady isn&#039;t easy... especially if you&#039;re trying to pick out fine detail.  And buying a monopod or tripod isn&#039;t in everyone&#039;s budget.  Using a broomstick, seat yourself comfortably where the broomstick is at least as tall as eye level when held in front of you.  Now, hold your binoculars in one hand.  With the other, put the end of the broomstick under the body of the binoculars where they flex (also where the mounting holes are for a tripod.)

If you&#039;re looking at an object that is not overhead, the ground end of the broomstick should be tilted ahead of you.  If it&#039;s overhead, the broomstick will be almost straight up and down.  To change positions, either move the ground end of the stick towards you to support the binoculars when looking up... or away from you when looking ahead, etc.

One of the reasons the painter&#039;s poles work very well in the circumstance is because taller people can easily screw on another 1 foot section to make the finn stick longer and their seat doesn&#039;t have to be as low...  But the majority of people are able to use a broom handle with ease.  It doesn&#039;t take long before your hands get the trick of just where to steady the binoculars and you&#039;re off and running!

I often give binocular programs to large groups of youngsters and the Observatory simply can&#039;t afford 15 tripods... but it didn&#039;t take long to come up with 15 old broom handles!  (i use the painter&#039;s poles because i&#039;m tall, and when i unscrew the sections at the end of the observing lesson, i can easily store them all in an old tube sock. and... believe it or not...  adding a crutch tip at the ground end and more sections makes it easy to make a very tall pole you can use standing up while on pavement!  cost?  under $2.)

Astronomy... on the fly!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No tripod?  No problem.  I am going to give you a trick of the trade you&#039;re going to love!  All it requires is either a broomstick, or one of those painter&#039;s extension handles that screws together in sections.  What we&#039;re going to make is called a finn stick!</p>
<p>Holding binoculars steady isn&#039;t easy&#8230; especially if you&#039;re trying to pick out fine detail.  And buying a monopod or tripod isn&#039;t in everyone&#039;s budget.  Using a broomstick, seat yourself comfortably where the broomstick is at least as tall as eye level when held in front of you.  Now, hold your binoculars in one hand.  With the other, put the end of the broomstick under the body of the binoculars where they flex (also where the mounting holes are for a tripod.)</p>
<p>If you&#039;re looking at an object that is not overhead, the ground end of the broomstick should be tilted ahead of you.  If it&#039;s overhead, the broomstick will be almost straight up and down.  To change positions, either move the ground end of the stick towards you to support the binoculars when looking up&#8230; or away from you when looking ahead, etc.</p>
<p>One of the reasons the painter&#039;s poles work very well in the circumstance is because taller people can easily screw on another 1 foot section to make the finn stick longer and their seat doesn&#039;t have to be as low&#8230;  But the majority of people are able to use a broom handle with ease.  It doesn&#039;t take long before your hands get the trick of just where to steady the binoculars and you&#039;re off and running!</p>
<p>I often give binocular programs to large groups of youngsters and the Observatory simply can&#039;t afford 15 tripods&#8230; but it didn&#039;t take long to come up with 15 old broom handles!  (i use the painter&#039;s poles because i&#039;m tall, and when i unscrew the sections at the end of the observing lesson, i can easily store them all in an old tube sock. and&#8230; believe it or not&#8230;  adding a crutch tip at the ground end and more sections makes it easy to make a very tall pole you can use standing up while on pavement!  cost?  under $2.)</p>
<p>Astronomy&#8230; on the fly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidRavenMoon</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-18255</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidRavenMoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 06:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-18255</guid>
		<description>I have a pair of Celestron SkyMaster 15x70, very nice, but a tripod is a must!

Not as good for viewing planets as my old 6&quot; reflector I had as a kid was though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a pair of Celestron SkyMaster 15&#215;70, very nice, but a tripod is a must!</p>
<p>Not as good for viewing planets as my old 6&#034; reflector I had as a kid was though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fraser Cain</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-18253</link>
		<dc:creator>Fraser Cain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 04:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-18253</guid>
		<description>Tammy&#039;s going to be working on a follow up article about some easy targets to observe with binoculars. I&#039;d love to post an article on digital cameras and binoculars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tammy&#039;s going to be working on a follow up article about some easy targets to observe with binoculars. I&#039;d love to post an article on digital cameras and binoculars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haplo</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-18252</link>
		<dc:creator>Haplo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 04:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-18252</guid>
		<description>Most decent &quot;big&quot; binocs (9x63 and up) have tripod mount atachments.

For digital photography, I haven&#039;t seen any.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most decent &#034;big&#034; binocs (9&#215;63 and up) have tripod mount atachments.</p>
<p>For digital photography, I haven&#039;t seen any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrofiend (Syd, Aust)</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-18247</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrofiend (Syd, Aust)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 02:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-18247</guid>
		<description>#  Emission Nebula Says:
April 15th, 2008 at 3:03 pm

&quot;The only problem, and maybe its just me, but I cant hold binoculars still. Trying to view Mars with shaky hands is annoying.&quot;


Indeed it is a problem with binos. There are a number of solutions though...

Try taping a broom handle or similar to the binos in some way - its inertia stops small rapid wiggles very effectively. 

You can try using a tripod if you have some extra dosh to spare, and a parallelogram mount with a tripod is even more effective.

http://www.gcw.org.uk/bino/binonet.htm

But truly the best innovation for small binos has to be the Skywindow. It really makes bino viewing a pleasure, and if you can&#039;t afford one they can be made DIY with a little ingenuity and resourcefulness. 

http://www.tricomachine.com/skywindow/


In relation to the use of binos for amateur astronomy - they really are the best introduction to amateur astronomy you can buy. You see a lot, learn the sky quickly and even a mediocre pair of binos will show you the sky much more effectively than a mediocre telescope. 

Let me just state that again - DO NOT buy a poor quality telescope if you are starting out in astronomy, and by poor quality I mean any telescope sold at a department store, a generic &#039;science&#039; shop, most camera shops and almost any telescope on ebay. Good telescopes can be had for not much outlay, but speak to a specialist telescope shop to learn about them and to sort the good-but-cheap scopes from the cheap and nasty stuff. 

Really though, if you haven&#039;t been using binos for a while, then a telescope is probably too much too soon. A pair of binos and a good introductory book on the subject is the best way to get into amateur astronomy.

http://www.amazon.com/Touring-Universe-through-Binoculars-Astronomers/dp/0471513377</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#  Emission Nebula Says:<br />
April 15th, 2008 at 3:03 pm</p>
<p>&#034;The only problem, and maybe its just me, but I cant hold binoculars still. Trying to view Mars with shaky hands is annoying.&#034;</p>
<p>Indeed it is a problem with binos. There are a number of solutions though&#8230;</p>
<p>Try taping a broom handle or similar to the binos in some way &#8211; its inertia stops small rapid wiggles very effectively. </p>
<p>You can try using a tripod if you have some extra dosh to spare, and a parallelogram mount with a tripod is even more effective.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gcw.org.uk/bino/binonet.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.gcw.org.uk/bino/binonet.htm</a></p>
<p>But truly the best innovation for small binos has to be the Skywindow. It really makes bino viewing a pleasure, and if you can&#039;t afford one they can be made DIY with a little ingenuity and resourcefulness. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.tricomachine.com/skywindow/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tricomachine.com/skywindow/</a></p>
<p>In relation to the use of binos for amateur astronomy &#8211; they really are the best introduction to amateur astronomy you can buy. You see a lot, learn the sky quickly and even a mediocre pair of binos will show you the sky much more effectively than a mediocre telescope. </p>
<p>Let me just state that again &#8211; DO NOT buy a poor quality telescope if you are starting out in astronomy, and by poor quality I mean any telescope sold at a department store, a generic &#039;science&#039; shop, most camera shops and almost any telescope on ebay. Good telescopes can be had for not much outlay, but speak to a specialist telescope shop to learn about them and to sort the good-but-cheap scopes from the cheap and nasty stuff. </p>
<p>Really though, if you haven&#039;t been using binos for a while, then a telescope is probably too much too soon. A pair of binos and a good introductory book on the subject is the best way to get into amateur astronomy.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Touring-Universe-through-Binoculars-Astronomers/dp/0471513377" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Touring-Universe-through-Binoculars-Astronomers/dp/0471513377</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/15/binoculars-for-astronomy/comment-page-1/#comment-18243</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13665#comment-18243</guid>
		<description>And one more question...are there any that are compatable with digital photography?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And one more question&#8230;are there any that are compatable with digital photography?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
