<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What was Before the Big Bang? An Identical, Reversed Universe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:56:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Bobster</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-4/#comment-63807</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bobster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-63807</guid>
		<description>Why do the theists always hav e to post their drivel when constructive debates are on hand.
I never post on their sites.  (By the way, where are their sites? Revenge!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do the theists always hav e to post their drivel when constructive debates are on hand.<br />
I never post on their sites.  (By the way, where are their sites? Revenge!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-4/#comment-58201</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-58201</guid>
		<description>Would this mean that our universe will eventually expand to a certain point and then start getting smaller until another big bang occurred? The universe created from this big bang would follow the same pattern: grow, shrink, and &quot;bang.&quot; Is it a never ending pattern?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would this mean that our universe will eventually expand to a certain point and then start getting smaller until another big bang occurred? The universe created from this big bang would follow the same pattern: grow, shrink, and &#034;bang.&#034; Is it a never ending pattern?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: endless</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-4/#comment-56919</link>
		<dc:creator>endless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-56919</guid>
		<description>Just a little thought:

Here&#039;s a suggestion (speculation) that before the big bang, there was (probably) a big bounce. So what did we have before the &#039;big bounce&#039;? Another &#039;Big b.....&#039; I suppose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a little thought:</p>
<p>Here&#039;s a suggestion (speculation) that before the big bang, there was (probably) a big bounce. So what did we have before the &#039;big bounce&#039;? Another &#039;Big b&#8230;..&#039; I suppose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CFIBAI</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-4/#comment-56049</link>
		<dc:creator>CFIBAI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-56049</guid>
		<description>Universe=White=Mirror=Opposite= Big Bang therefore white none expanding.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Universe=White=Mirror=Opposite= Big Bang therefore white none expanding&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les Schonbrun</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-3/#comment-48137</link>
		<dc:creator>Les Schonbrun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 05:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-48137</guid>
		<description>It seems likely that we can never know about what, if anything, preceded the big bang. On the other hand, it is only relatively recently that science has learned that  there was a big bang. The Idea of a cyclical universe seems much more likely to me than the possibility that at one moment nothing existed and  a moment later the big bang occurred. The concept of big crunches and big bounces seems much more in keeping with what we know about how nature works. 

I&#039;d like to add another thought to ponder. It seems likely to me that if we learn that the universe is, indeed, cyclical, we will later learn that there are other cyclical universes and these universes are parts of a larger system.  Ultimately, we will accept the realization that existence is infinitely complex. Beginnings and creations are human concepts. The nature of nature is infinite complexity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems likely that we can never know about what, if anything, preceded the big bang. On the other hand, it is only relatively recently that science has learned that  there was a big bang. The Idea of a cyclical universe seems much more likely to me than the possibility that at one moment nothing existed and  a moment later the big bang occurred. The concept of big crunches and big bounces seems much more in keeping with what we know about how nature works. </p>
<p>I&#039;d like to add another thought to ponder. It seems likely to me that if we learn that the universe is, indeed, cyclical, we will later learn that there are other cyclical universes and these universes are parts of a larger system.  Ultimately, we will accept the realization that existence is infinitely complex. Beginnings and creations are human concepts. The nature of nature is infinite complexity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-3/#comment-46902</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-46902</guid>
		<description>Before the big bang and the universe, there was only God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before the big bang and the universe, there was only God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dulce</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-3/#comment-41059</link>
		<dc:creator>Dulce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-41059</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have much difficulty imagining what came before the big bang anymore than I have trouble imagining where I was for 13+ billion years.  Space and time were created by the big bang.  There simply was nothing prior to that - as far as we know.

And if we eventually learn otherwise, great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t have much difficulty imagining what came before the big bang anymore than I have trouble imagining where I was for 13+ billion years.  Space and time were created by the big bang.  There simply was nothing prior to that &#8211; as far as we know.</p>
<p>And if we eventually learn otherwise, great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ella</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-3/#comment-36091</link>
		<dc:creator>ella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 02:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-36091</guid>
		<description>a lot of you ppl have really good points.
however, the multiple theories concerning pre-big bang will be very difficult to prove. i think the answer would be too complex for any human to thorughouly comprehend. it would be nice to somewhat understand the greatest mysteries of the universe, but maybe were not meant to know them.  if there are other solar systems in our universe that contain other planets than hold intelligent life, then perhaps there are other universes beyound ours. anything is possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a lot of you ppl have really good points.<br />
however, the multiple theories concerning pre-big bang will be very difficult to prove. i think the answer would be too complex for any human to thorughouly comprehend. it would be nice to somewhat understand the greatest mysteries of the universe, but maybe were not meant to know them.  if there are other solar systems in our universe that contain other planets than hold intelligent life, then perhaps there are other universes beyound ours. anything is possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbrt</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-3/#comment-26304</link>
		<dc:creator>rbrt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-26304</guid>
		<description>man i like dave chapelle too. he is so funny :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>man i like dave chapelle too. he is so funny <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-3/#comment-25826</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 23:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-25826</guid>
		<description>where would the universe get too before it started to contract again, and whats on the other side of that threshold</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where would the universe get too before it started to contract again, and whats on the other side of that threshold</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kanada</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-3/#comment-24258</link>
		<dc:creator>kanada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 12:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-24258</guid>
		<description>Untill someone fits gravity into quantum mechanics its hard to take this to seriously. The absence of gravity from quantum theory is the equivalent of not understanding dirt and its relation to plants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Untill someone fits gravity into quantum mechanics its hard to take this to seriously. The absence of gravity from quantum theory is the equivalent of not understanding dirt and its relation to plants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-3/#comment-23960</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 02:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-23960</guid>
		<description>Conservation of 4-space momentum for both universes

Wait. does this mean an identical &quot;me&quot; is being subjected to a preposterous amount of BS on a daily basis but in reverse?  

Or is the reverse relative and I am the one going in reverse? and I though I was moving ahead in life!

Has physics explained all the anti-entropy machines running around this planet yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservation of 4-space momentum for both universes</p>
<p>Wait. does this mean an identical &#034;me&#034; is being subjected to a preposterous amount of BS on a daily basis but in reverse?  </p>
<p>Or is the reverse relative and I am the one going in reverse? and I though I was moving ahead in life!</p>
<p>Has physics explained all the anti-entropy machines running around this planet yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rusty shackleford</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-3/#comment-23563</link>
		<dc:creator>rusty shackleford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 08:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-23563</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m no conquerer of ignorance, in fact I&#039;m quite ravaged by it, but I wonder why people don&#039;t see religion as inferior intelligence. For example trying to cut down a tree with a knife, they have much more efficient means of accomplishing that now (chainsaws), so isn&#039;t science the progressing intelligence of existence, making religion a failed hypothesis? Does anyone honestly think that people back then had the capacity to confirm their assumptions? I think the people who created religion as a means to tame people, pooped behind bushes. It seems to me they just didn&#039;t have the technology to comprehend the world around them so they came up with whatever might comfort those best to deal with death and keep everyone from running amuck. Could it be the religious creators we just mere children in the evolution of intelligence? It seems obvious to me...
I&#039;m not hating on religion I just see it as nothing more than wishful thinking and an out of date idea...
 
so maybe this point we are at now is another stage of understanding, trial and error. Its good to have options, process of elimination will eventually find the answer so long as there are minds hungry enough for it.
For those who still cling to religion, I think they&#039;re just affraid to abanndon their belief for the fear of being ignorant, or maybe they just don&#039;t want to accept the end and have to rely on the after life to console their anxiety.

These new ideas are just the next step to the answer, there can only be so many ideas and with the race for it growing ever faster, eventually someone will find the evidence to solidify one of these hypothesis. That&#039;s life, understanding, and there&#039;s plenty of it. I don&#039;t know the inner workings of the big bang, but it makes me think, and gives me a warm fuzzy feeling in my heart to appreciate the actual fact of being aware of such important information. Its nice to be informed, so thanks for this mind opening discussion, I have certainly enjoyed absorbing all this and sorting it out in the logical file cabinet. Aren&#039;t we all just like the kid that keeps asking why. Why? Because its human nature. That&#039;s all I know. Thanks for enduring my ramblings, I feel better now. Good luck in life everyone  :-j</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m no conquerer of ignorance, in fact I&#039;m quite ravaged by it, but I wonder why people don&#039;t see religion as inferior intelligence. For example trying to cut down a tree with a knife, they have much more efficient means of accomplishing that now (chainsaws), so isn&#039;t science the progressing intelligence of existence, making religion a failed hypothesis? Does anyone honestly think that people back then had the capacity to confirm their assumptions? I think the people who created religion as a means to tame people, pooped behind bushes. It seems to me they just didn&#039;t have the technology to comprehend the world around them so they came up with whatever might comfort those best to deal with death and keep everyone from running amuck. Could it be the religious creators we just mere children in the evolution of intelligence? It seems obvious to me&#8230;<br />
I&#039;m not hating on religion I just see it as nothing more than wishful thinking and an out of date idea&#8230;</p>
<p>so maybe this point we are at now is another stage of understanding, trial and error. Its good to have options, process of elimination will eventually find the answer so long as there are minds hungry enough for it.<br />
For those who still cling to religion, I think they&#039;re just affraid to abanndon their belief for the fear of being ignorant, or maybe they just don&#039;t want to accept the end and have to rely on the after life to console their anxiety.</p>
<p>These new ideas are just the next step to the answer, there can only be so many ideas and with the race for it growing ever faster, eventually someone will find the evidence to solidify one of these hypothesis. That&#039;s life, understanding, and there&#039;s plenty of it. I don&#039;t know the inner workings of the big bang, but it makes me think, and gives me a warm fuzzy feeling in my heart to appreciate the actual fact of being aware of such important information. Its nice to be informed, so thanks for this mind opening discussion, I have certainly enjoyed absorbing all this and sorting it out in the logical file cabinet. Aren&#039;t we all just like the kid that keeps asking why. Why? Because its human nature. That&#039;s all I know. Thanks for enduring my ramblings, I feel better now. Good luck in life everyone  :-j</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-3/#comment-23517</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 01:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-23517</guid>
		<description>Markus Stone writes: &quot;must read&quot;
So if this clumpy universe of ours really did expand from a singularity, why, that sounds pretty much like a black hole running backwards, doesn&#039;t it? Matter being regurgitated from a singularity. Given the fact that matter in our universe seems to like to clump together, eventually the fate of all matter must eventually be to get sucked back in to a singularity (black hole). What&#039;s left of the earth will surely eventually go down that big ol&#039; gurgler at the middle of the milky way - and then what? Oops, there goes the Magellanic clouds. And Andromeda got a bit too close - oops there you go! And so on and so forthâ€¦

So I&#039;m thinking here that the universe just vacillates back and forth. Singularity in forwards time is just called a black hole, singularity in reverse time is called a big bang. Everything starts with one and ends with the other. Whether you&#039;re traveling &#039;forwards&#039; or &#039;backwards&#039; through time is simply a matter of perspective. Same way a particle in forwards time behaves exactly the same an anti-particle in reverse. It&#039;s all just a matter of perspective.

I&#039;m thinking maybe they&#039;re the same thing. Matter falls into the black hole. That matter can no longer see anything of the universe from whence it came because of the event horizon now enclosing it. Relativity predicts an equal and opposite parallel universe inside a black hole with a second singularity with of exact opposite characteristics - a white hole where matter can only escape (in other words a big bang that can only exist within the confines of the black hole&#039;s event horizon). 

If our universe were born from a white hole singularity inside a black hole, it would look essentially the same, as we cannot see beyond the edge of our event horizon. As our black hole / universe absorbs more matter, the event horizon expands, which is analogous to the expansion of the universe itself. 

It&#039;s already been theorized that micro black holes could behave exactly like normal atomic particles, as both are simply singularities. Perhaps they are the same thing and our universe is simply a seething mass of singularities of various scales moving in opposite directions on a timeline - one way for matter, the other for antimatter (or normal matter who&#039;s time happens to be running backwards).

Markus,

I agree with you and I&#039;m thinking as the same as you are with the black holes. Maybe we came from a black hole that had back fired. Why are we finding more and more black holes? I do think the birth of our universe has something to do with the black holes. Does it seem that there is a black hole in every solar system? What happens (if) all these black holes and matter becomes one big black hole? Are we a universe made an existing universe????

I do think it all does have something to do with the black holes, but the question is how did it all start???

Markus, I think you have excellent points which I do agree with and thinking on the same level as you. Excellent!!!!

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Markus Stone writes: &#034;must read&#034;<br />
So if this clumpy universe of ours really did expand from a singularity, why, that sounds pretty much like a black hole running backwards, doesn&#039;t it? Matter being regurgitated from a singularity. Given the fact that matter in our universe seems to like to clump together, eventually the fate of all matter must eventually be to get sucked back in to a singularity (black hole). What&#039;s left of the earth will surely eventually go down that big ol&#039; gurgler at the middle of the milky way &#8211; and then what? Oops, there goes the Magellanic clouds. And Andromeda got a bit too close &#8211; oops there you go! And so on and so forthâ€¦</p>
<p>So I&#039;m thinking here that the universe just vacillates back and forth. Singularity in forwards time is just called a black hole, singularity in reverse time is called a big bang. Everything starts with one and ends with the other. Whether you&#039;re traveling &#039;forwards&#039; or &#039;backwards&#039; through time is simply a matter of perspective. Same way a particle in forwards time behaves exactly the same an anti-particle in reverse. It&#039;s all just a matter of perspective.</p>
<p>I&#039;m thinking maybe they&#039;re the same thing. Matter falls into the black hole. That matter can no longer see anything of the universe from whence it came because of the event horizon now enclosing it. Relativity predicts an equal and opposite parallel universe inside a black hole with a second singularity with of exact opposite characteristics &#8211; a white hole where matter can only escape (in other words a big bang that can only exist within the confines of the black hole&#039;s event horizon). </p>
<p>If our universe were born from a white hole singularity inside a black hole, it would look essentially the same, as we cannot see beyond the edge of our event horizon. As our black hole / universe absorbs more matter, the event horizon expands, which is analogous to the expansion of the universe itself. </p>
<p>It&#039;s already been theorized that micro black holes could behave exactly like normal atomic particles, as both are simply singularities. Perhaps they are the same thing and our universe is simply a seething mass of singularities of various scales moving in opposite directions on a timeline &#8211; one way for matter, the other for antimatter (or normal matter who&#039;s time happens to be running backwards).</p>
<p>Markus,</p>
<p>I agree with you and I&#039;m thinking as the same as you are with the black holes. Maybe we came from a black hole that had back fired. Why are we finding more and more black holes? I do think the birth of our universe has something to do with the black holes. Does it seem that there is a black hole in every solar system? What happens (if) all these black holes and matter becomes one big black hole? Are we a universe made an existing universe????</p>
<p>I do think it all does have something to do with the black holes, but the question is how did it all start???</p>
<p>Markus, I think you have excellent points which I do agree with and thinking on the same level as you. Excellent!!!!</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yo Mommy</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-3/#comment-19822</link>
		<dc:creator>Yo Mommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-19822</guid>
		<description>Utter total garbage.  Get a life!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Utter total garbage.  Get a life!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-3/#comment-18803</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 07:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-18803</guid>
		<description>nothing like avoiding the question by giving a mirror image of the delima.  They  wont answer the question &quot;what was before the Big Bang? &quot;  they just give a mirror image of the Big BAng to avoid answering it.

what was before this quantum copy of the Big Bang? Try running in the funny room with the maze of mirrors and ask a evolutionist that question. Its a madness they give to avoid answering. 

Nothing creates nothing. rewind the big bang movie in your mind. There had to be a start and the start needs an intelligent Creator. &quot;In the begginning God created the heavens and the earth&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nothing like avoiding the question by giving a mirror image of the delima.  They  wont answer the question &#034;what was before the Big Bang? &#034;  they just give a mirror image of the Big BAng to avoid answering it.</p>
<p>what was before this quantum copy of the Big Bang? Try running in the funny room with the maze of mirrors and ask a evolutionist that question. Its a madness they give to avoid answering. </p>
<p>Nothing creates nothing. rewind the big bang movie in your mind. There had to be a start and the start needs an intelligent Creator. &#034;In the begginning God created the heavens and the earth&#034;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StirFry</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-3/#comment-18795</link>
		<dc:creator>StirFry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 05:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-18795</guid>
		<description>This is all very nice and all very speculative. What caused this expansion and contraction in the first place? I mean, without bringing in &quot;god&quot; and the rest of that baggage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all very nice and all very speculative. What caused this expansion and contraction in the first place? I mean, without bringing in &#034;god&#034; and the rest of that baggage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ray matesevac</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-3/#comment-18674</link>
		<dc:creator>ray matesevac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-18674</guid>
		<description>all very interesting but where did the very first bit of energy or matter come from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all very interesting but where did the very first bit of energy or matter come from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Near Buffalo</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-3/#comment-18392</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Near Buffalo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-18392</guid>
		<description>good point</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good point</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dark Gnat</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-3/#comment-18382</link>
		<dc:creator>Dark Gnat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-18382</guid>
		<description>If time did not exist before our universe began, then there is no &quot;before&quot; the big bang.  

There is no way we can know how the universe worked before that, because our very ways of thinking are a result of the current post-bang universe.  We simply are not capable of understanding the events before, because there is no &quot;before&quot; for us to perceive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If time did not exist before our universe began, then there is no &#034;before&#034; the big bang.  </p>
<p>There is no way we can know how the universe worked before that, because our very ways of thinking are a result of the current post-bang universe.  We simply are not capable of understanding the events before, because there is no &#034;before&#034; for us to perceive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Conrad</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-3/#comment-18315</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Conrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-18315</guid>
		<description>I&quot;m gonna put my 2 cents in and say that this is a numbers game only.  Until we find physical evidence, which good scientists will do.  I look forward to ideas on how to test this theory, and their results!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#034;m gonna put my 2 cents in and say that this is a numbers game only.  Until we find physical evidence, which good scientists will do.  I look forward to ideas on how to test this theory, and their results!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RL</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-3/#comment-18296</link>
		<dc:creator>RL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-18296</guid>
		<description>It may just be that since we&#039;re of this universe, we&#039;ll never be able to understand or know what lies outside of it in a scientific way.  All of our techniques and logic are based on the physics of the universe we live in.  We may never know what was there before the Big Bang...

...I think all of this is in the realm of hypothesis until someone can find a way to test these ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may just be that since we&#039;re of this universe, we&#039;ll never be able to understand or know what lies outside of it in a scientific way.  All of our techniques and logic are based on the physics of the universe we live in.  We may never know what was there before the Big Bang&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;I think all of this is in the realm of hypothesis until someone can find a way to test these ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molecular</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-3/#comment-18283</link>
		<dc:creator>Molecular</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-18283</guid>
		<description>Maybe the Universe is more like the contents inside of a lava lamp. It could be oozing into existence, stretching out, expanding, swelling up, with some parts of itself breaking off, forming yet smaller parts which then expand, or, contract, and even merge with other parts, infinitely. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the Universe is more like the contents inside of a lava lamp. It could be oozing into existence, stretching out, expanding, swelling up, with some parts of itself breaking off, forming yet smaller parts which then expand, or, contract, and even merge with other parts, infinitely. <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Sieling</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-3/#comment-18277</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Sieling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-18277</guid>
		<description>There are a lot of contradictions in the subject, which is understandable given that it pushes against the edge of what can be understood scientifically. But the one that leaps out at me is that there can be no information observed from the past universe, yet its structures dictate the structures that appear in the following universe. Wouldn&#039;t that be a carrying over of information?

It also seems weird to think about time as something contained by the universe, and yet to try and imagine something &#039;before&#039; the universe - it sorta breaks down, but I think I&#039;m focussing on the strict semantics too much. This really does edge against the realm of spirituality as much as it does science. Fun stuff to think about, though - thanks for the writeup!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of contradictions in the subject, which is understandable given that it pushes against the edge of what can be understood scientifically. But the one that leaps out at me is that there can be no information observed from the past universe, yet its structures dictate the structures that appear in the following universe. Wouldn&#039;t that be a carrying over of information?</p>
<p>It also seems weird to think about time as something contained by the universe, and yet to try and imagine something &#039;before&#039; the universe &#8211; it sorta breaks down, but I think I&#039;m focussing on the strict semantics too much. This really does edge against the realm of spirituality as much as it does science. Fun stuff to think about, though &#8211; thanks for the writeup!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/14/what-was-before-the-big-bang-an-identical-reversed-universe/comment-page-2/#comment-18246</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 02:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/?p=13630#comment-18246</guid>
		<description>hi konstantine. Thanks for the great answer on the chicken coming first. I&#039;m using that from now on! 

And If the chicken was first the pardox remains. Which I kind of like actually b/c it means science will never have all the answers and neither will religion. You end up having to decide what you do or don&#039;t believe. But the fact that we exist at all is some form of miracle, which you can take religiously or not. 

Markus stone, I enjoyed reading your concept. I&#039;m not a science dude so I don&#039;t know whether it is plausible or not but its interesting. I got hung up on the very last point you made about the universe appearing to accelerate but its actually time slowing. Can you elaborate to help my peanut brain?  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi konstantine. Thanks for the great answer on the chicken coming first. I&#039;m using that from now on! </p>
<p>And If the chicken was first the pardox remains. Which I kind of like actually b/c it means science will never have all the answers and neither will religion. You end up having to decide what you do or don&#039;t believe. But the fact that we exist at all is some form of miracle, which you can take religiously or not. </p>
<p>Markus stone, I enjoyed reading your concept. I&#039;m not a science dude so I don&#039;t know whether it is plausible or not but its interesting. I got hung up on the very last point you made about the universe appearing to accelerate but its actually time slowing. Can you elaborate to help my peanut brain?  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
