<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK &quot;Time Machine&quot; Reveals The Formation Of Distant Galaxies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:17:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wolfgang Hebel</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/comment-page-1/#comment-28555</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfgang Hebel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/#comment-28555</guid>
		<description>An updatedy version of my study entitled &quot;A different view on cosmic redshift&quot; has been published under the aforementioned website, on August 1, 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An updatedy version of my study entitled &#034;A different view on cosmic redshift&#034; has been published under the aforementioned website, on August 1, 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfgang HEBEL</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/comment-page-1/#comment-18059</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfgang HEBEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/#comment-18059</guid>
		<description>I further show in my paper that the cosmic redshift ratio corresponds to z=H/c . r and that the distance of a given cosmic radiation source corresponds to r=c/H . ln(z+1). This admits considering cosmic distances which largely exceed the postulated age of the Universe limited at ~ 14 billion lightyears according to the Big Bang hypothesis. There is no theoretical limit of the dimension of the Universe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I further show in my paper that the cosmic redshift ratio corresponds to z=H/c . r and that the distance of a given cosmic radiation source corresponds to r=c/H . ln(z+1). This admits considering cosmic distances which largely exceed the postulated age of the Universe limited at ~ 14 billion lightyears according to the Big Bang hypothesis. There is no theoretical limit of the dimension of the Universe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfgang HEBEL</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/comment-page-1/#comment-18058</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfgang HEBEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/#comment-18058</guid>
		<description>In my paper I explaIn that the Hubble constant (~70 km/s per megaparsec) divided by the velocity of light (H*) represents a cosmic photon absorption coefficient amounting to 0.00023 per megaparesec or 0.00007 per million lightyears. This implies that we usually cannot look deeper into the Universe than about 14 billion lightyears, except in case of supernova explosions producing much higher surface temperatures of the cosmic radiation source than ordinary stars or galaxies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my paper I explaIn that the Hubble constant (~70 km/s per megaparsec) divided by the velocity of light (H*) represents a cosmic photon absorption coefficient amounting to 0.00023 per megaparesec or 0.00007 per million lightyears. This implies that we usually cannot look deeper into the Universe than about 14 billion lightyears, except in case of supernova explosions producing much higher surface temperatures of the cosmic radiation source than ordinary stars or galaxies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfgang HEBEL</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/comment-page-1/#comment-18053</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfgang HEBEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 16:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/#comment-18053</guid>
		<description>My recent paper deals with &quot;Cosmic redshift, a phenomenon of Quantum Elexctrodynamics&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My recent paper deals with &#034;Cosmic redshift, a phenomenon of Quantum Elexctrodynamics&#034;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harin</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/comment-page-1/#comment-17745</link>
		<dc:creator>Harin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 05:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/#comment-17745</guid>
		<description>Peter, we are looking at them as they would have appeared 10 billion years ago. THe same way when they look at us today, we appear in ancient light.

But by now probably these ancient galaxies have slipped beyong the horizon and the light they emit today would never ever make it to us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, we are looking at them as they would have appeared 10 billion years ago. THe same way when they look at us today, we appear in ancient light.</p>
<p>But by now probably these ancient galaxies have slipped beyong the horizon and the light they emit today would never ever make it to us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/comment-page-1/#comment-17687</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 11:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/#comment-17687</guid>
		<description>Awsome!

Just think: 
only a genaration (or two) ago we didn&#039;t know that there were galaxies. Today we&#039;re looking at a 10 billion year old one!!!

I&#039;m anxious to see what more wonders these guys will have to show to us in 5 or 10 years!! We are almost reaching the final horizon.

By th way, i believe that sooner or later someone, somehow, will find a way to look beyond the actual theorized visible limit.

I just hope that that happen in my life time!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awsome!</p>
<p>Just think:<br />
only a genaration (or two) ago we didn&#039;t know that there were galaxies. Today we&#039;re looking at a 10 billion year old one!!!</p>
<p>I&#039;m anxious to see what more wonders these guys will have to show to us in 5 or 10 years!! We are almost reaching the final horizon.</p>
<p>By th way, i believe that sooner or later someone, somehow, will find a way to look beyond the actual theorized visible limit.</p>
<p>I just hope that that happen in my life time!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurel</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/comment-page-1/#comment-17473</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 15:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/#comment-17473</guid>
		<description>I like the way your thinking Peter.  Have you read the Holographic Universe. by Michael Talbot?  I met a man who said something that changed my idea of time.  He said, when we look to the Night sky we could say, &quot; Aren&#039;t We beautiful&quot;.  Perhaps, We are just looking at who, and where, we were at a different place in time.  HMMM...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the way your thinking Peter.  Have you read the Holographic Universe. by Michael Talbot?  I met a man who said something that changed my idea of time.  He said, when we look to the Night sky we could say, &#034; Aren&#039;t We beautiful&#034;.  Perhaps, We are just looking at who, and where, we were at a different place in time.  HMMM&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter K</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/comment-page-1/#comment-17472</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 14:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/#comment-17472</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a question...if we look at those galaxies and say they were 10 billion years ago, wouldn&#039;t they be looking at us and saying the same thing? Whose to say who is the older? Isn&#039;t that just a bias on our part?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#039;s a question&#8230;if we look at those galaxies and say they were 10 billion years ago, wouldn&#039;t they be looking at us and saying the same thing? Whose to say who is the older? Isn&#039;t that just a bias on our part?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/comment-page-1/#comment-17444</link>
		<dc:creator>jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 04:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/#comment-17444</guid>
		<description>&quot;UK astronomers have compiled data from the United Kingdom Infrared Telescope (UKIRT) in Hawaii and their results are nothing less than astounding.&quot;

Astounding in what way? I can buy an astounding Chia pet by dialing 1-800-chia pet and having my visa card ready. 

It is astounding to see such large galaxies at such great distances. It is even more astounding if they are &#039;mature&#039;...are they?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;UK astronomers have compiled data from the United Kingdom Infrared Telescope (UKIRT) in Hawaii and their results are nothing less than astounding.&#034;</p>
<p>Astounding in what way? I can buy an astounding Chia pet by dialing 1-800-chia pet and having my visa card ready. </p>
<p>It is astounding to see such large galaxies at such great distances. It is even more astounding if they are &#039;mature&#039;&#8230;are they?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salva</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/comment-page-1/#comment-17424</link>
		<dc:creator>Salva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 09:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/#comment-17424</guid>
		<description>Our Visible Universe is only a very little portion of the real &#039;Universe&#039;...a 3-dimensional sheet of a 11(?)-dimensional one. So, don&#039;t worry...and lets the search for the true to continue until the end of......The Universe!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our Visible Universe is only a very little portion of the real &#039;Universe&#039;&#8230;a 3-dimensional sheet of a 11(?)-dimensional one. So, don&#039;t worry&#8230;and lets the search for the true to continue until the end of&#8230;&#8230;The Universe!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: giovanni</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/comment-page-1/#comment-17421</link>
		<dc:creator>giovanni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 07:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/#comment-17421</guid>
		<description>the more i read about the universe the more  i find myself  convinced that the whole universe  is round  and circling around the unknown further it could veri well be that this is not the only one  it could very well be many others. leading to infinity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the more i read about the universe the more  i find myself  convinced that the whole universe  is round  and circling around the unknown further it could veri well be that this is not the only one  it could very well be many others. leading to infinity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alokmohan</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/comment-page-1/#comment-17413</link>
		<dc:creator>alokmohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 05:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/#comment-17413</guid>
		<description>Arp  narlikar  theory.Give   the  link  please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arp  narlikar  theory.Give   the  link  please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobbiNewman</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/comment-page-1/#comment-17406</link>
		<dc:creator>RobbiNewman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 00:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/#comment-17406</guid>
		<description>The mere concept of the universe coming into existence from &#039;nothing&#039; has never sat well with me.

I am sure we will eventually see that nothing is something, and beyond that something is something else.

Pity we only &#039;live&#039; for about sixty years on average....not much time to get to furthest hill to see into the next valley...or plain...or sea...or whatever.....

It sure is a good look tho....lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mere concept of the universe coming into existence from &#039;nothing&#039; has never sat well with me.</p>
<p>I am sure we will eventually see that nothing is something, and beyond that something is something else.</p>
<p>Pity we only &#039;live&#039; for about sixty years on average&#8230;.not much time to get to furthest hill to see into the next valley&#8230;or plain&#8230;or sea&#8230;or whatever&#8230;..</p>
<p>It sure is a good look tho&#8230;.lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M. Kulick</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/comment-page-1/#comment-17400</link>
		<dc:creator>John M. Kulick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 20:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/#comment-17400</guid>
		<description>The current results apparently have not been published to the internet yet, but their 2006 work is available.

http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0608428
 

Snowflake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current results apparently have not been published to the internet yet, but their 2006 work is available.</p>
<p><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0608428" rel="nofollow">http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0608428</a></p>
<p>Snowflake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/comment-page-1/#comment-17381</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 14:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/#comment-17381</guid>
		<description>So -- What&#039;s the measured redshift (z value)of these observations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So &#8212; What&#039;s the measured redshift (z value)of these observations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikel</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/comment-page-1/#comment-17360</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 22:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/#comment-17360</guid>
		<description>To Wolfgang...

Not to mention the other viable alternatives, such as the Arp/Narlikar theory, etc.

Mikel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Wolfgang&#8230;</p>
<p>Not to mention the other viable alternatives, such as the Arp/Narlikar theory, etc.</p>
<p>Mikel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfgang HEBEL</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/comment-page-1/#comment-17354</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolfgang HEBEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/#comment-17354</guid>
		<description>The well-known Doppler effect of wave propagation is the principal argument of our usual view of an expanding Universe. However, a similar redshift effect of cosmic radiation results from the loss of photons by absorption onto celestial bodies. Re: My study &quot;The Mystery of Life&quot;, www.dwv-net.de, ISBN 978.3.935176.73.6. This alternative redshift mechanism casts doubt on our usual view of the universe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The well-known Doppler effect of wave propagation is the principal argument of our usual view of an expanding Universe. However, a similar redshift effect of cosmic radiation results from the loss of photons by absorption onto celestial bodies. Re: My study &#034;The Mystery of Life&#034;, <a href="http://www.dwv-net.de" rel="nofollow">http://www.dwv-net.de</a>, ISBN 978.3.935176.73.6. This alternative redshift mechanism casts doubt on our usual view of the universe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Alexander</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/comment-page-1/#comment-17352</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/04/uk-time-machine-reveals-the-formation-of-distant-galaxies/#comment-17352</guid>
		<description>Now, what interests ME as a professional astronomer is: what are the limiting magnitudes? Which bands? How much integration time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, what interests ME as a professional astronomer is: what are the limiting magnitudes? Which bands? How much integration time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
