<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So, What Does an Anti-Satellite Weapon Actually Look Like?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:17:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Semd</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/comment-page-1/#comment-47014</link>
		<dc:creator>Semd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 07:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/#comment-47014</guid>
		<description>Another satellite equipped with thrusters and gyroscope specialized in changing altitude and orbit to catch the suspect satellite and deliver a lode from a double barrel shot gun. like the gunfight at ok corral if the other satellite is also equipped as such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another satellite equipped with thrusters and gyroscope specialized in changing altitude and orbit to catch the suspect satellite and deliver a lode from a double barrel shot gun. like the gunfight at ok corral if the other satellite is also equipped as such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/comment-page-1/#comment-20240</link>
		<dc:creator>jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/#comment-20240</guid>
		<description>You guys arn&#039;t that smart......just f;y up there, and chain it to your ship.....then fly back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys arn&#039;t that smart&#8230;&#8230;just f;y up there, and chain it to your ship&#8230;..then fly back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave: The Spaceman!</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/comment-page-1/#comment-17953</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave: The Spaceman!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 04:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/#comment-17953</guid>
		<description>Very Interesting to see.  I am with the other comment about thinking it would be more complex looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very Interesting to see.  I am with the other comment about thinking it would be more complex looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanamonde</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/comment-page-1/#comment-17264</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanamonde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/#comment-17264</guid>
		<description>Hey, no need for explosion with a delta-V of like Mach 15 or so at a 90% angle. A chunk of our miitary&#039;s favorite heavy stuff, U-238, will do nicely. These mockups are more complex than I had imagine - but of course, you will be making course correction to insure impact!

Piece will go everywhere but the majority should deorbit after hitting that heavy piece of hallo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, no need for explosion with a delta-V of like Mach 15 or so at a 90% angle. A chunk of our miitary&#039;s favorite heavy stuff, U-238, will do nicely. These mockups are more complex than I had imagine &#8211; but of course, you will be making course correction to insure impact!</p>
<p>Piece will go everywhere but the majority should deorbit after hitting that heavy piece of hallo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrofiend (Syd, Aust)</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/comment-page-1/#comment-17188</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrofiend (Syd, Aust)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 02:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/#comment-17188</guid>
		<description>&quot;And to be honest, it doesn&#039;t look that scaryâ€¦&quot;

It&#039;d look a whole lot scarier if it was coming towards you at ~10 km.s^-1...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;And to be honest, it doesn&#039;t look that scaryâ€¦&#034;</p>
<p>It&#039;d look a whole lot scarier if it was coming towards you at ~10 km.s^-1&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dark Gnat</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/comment-page-1/#comment-17177</link>
		<dc:creator>Dark Gnat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 21:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/#comment-17177</guid>
		<description>The US has much more sophisticated means of eliminating orbiting objects.

They simply decided not to use them because they are *secret*, so they used 20 year old technology disguised as new technology.

Using a super-secret-laser to take out your own broken satellite wouldn&#039;t be very smart.  Enemies would realize that you have an advantage, and will quickly try to find out what it is.  It&#039;s best to save that special play for the game really counts.  They know that China, Russia, North Korea already knows about American ASATs, to there was nothing to lose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US has much more sophisticated means of eliminating orbiting objects.</p>
<p>They simply decided not to use them because they are *secret*, so they used 20 year old technology disguised as new technology.</p>
<p>Using a super-secret-laser to take out your own broken satellite wouldn&#039;t be very smart.  Enemies would realize that you have an advantage, and will quickly try to find out what it is.  It&#039;s best to save that special play for the game really counts.  They know that China, Russia, North Korea already knows about American ASATs, to there was nothing to lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/comment-page-1/#comment-17174</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/#comment-17174</guid>
		<description>Hi All,

I find the idea of &quot;shooting a satellite down&quot; to be a little more than naieve.  It can&#039;t be done.  Satellites are in orbit because of their large velocity.  The only way to truely de-orbit them is to slow them down.  Breaking them to pieces mearly makes a lot of little useless satellites that need to be tracked.  Objects in the lower part of LEO will spiral back to Earth in a relatively &#039;short&#039; time naturally because of atmospheric drag, but objects higher up will remain in orbit for a very long time (decades to thousands of years) whether they are large or tiny.  The large ones are easy to track and avoid, but the smaller ones cannot be easily tracked and there are already far too many of them in orbit.  They are a hazard to all space navigation and eventually one or more space missions WILL be seriously compromised by space junk unless we can clean it up.  I would like to see an international ban on breaking spacecraft up in orbit by any method and it should have serious consequences for any state, company, or individual that ignores the ban for any reason.  ASAT systems that leave many small pieces in orbit are hazards to all future space missions and have no place in a serious space fairing nation&#039;s arsenal because in the long run they are as dangerous to the perpetrator as they are to all other spacefairers.  Breaking satellites up in orbit is totally irresponsible.  As one responder mentioned above there are other ways to neutralize space weapons and surveillance equipment if necessary.  At least keep them in one big piece so they can be tracked.

Ron</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All,</p>
<p>I find the idea of &#034;shooting a satellite down&#034; to be a little more than naieve.  It can&#039;t be done.  Satellites are in orbit because of their large velocity.  The only way to truely de-orbit them is to slow them down.  Breaking them to pieces mearly makes a lot of little useless satellites that need to be tracked.  Objects in the lower part of LEO will spiral back to Earth in a relatively &#039;short&#039; time naturally because of atmospheric drag, but objects higher up will remain in orbit for a very long time (decades to thousands of years) whether they are large or tiny.  The large ones are easy to track and avoid, but the smaller ones cannot be easily tracked and there are already far too many of them in orbit.  They are a hazard to all space navigation and eventually one or more space missions WILL be seriously compromised by space junk unless we can clean it up.  I would like to see an international ban on breaking spacecraft up in orbit by any method and it should have serious consequences for any state, company, or individual that ignores the ban for any reason.  ASAT systems that leave many small pieces in orbit are hazards to all future space missions and have no place in a serious space fairing nation&#039;s arsenal because in the long run they are as dangerous to the perpetrator as they are to all other spacefairers.  Breaking satellites up in orbit is totally irresponsible.  As one responder mentioned above there are other ways to neutralize space weapons and surveillance equipment if necessary.  At least keep them in one big piece so they can be tracked.</p>
<p>Ron</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Kurant</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/comment-page-1/#comment-17166</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Kurant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/#comment-17166</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t have to blast it to bits.  You could simply fly up there with your remote controlled robot and spraypaint its cameras!  Or you could shoot lasers into its cameras, burning them out.

Or you could wrap some wire around its solar panels, shorting them out.

Or you could use tools to cut into it or cut cables or fuel lines, whatever is exposed.  

Or you could zap it with microwaves, frying the electronics inside. 

I&#039;m sure the military has thought of every one of these ideas and I bet every one of them is included in the current technology, which of course would be classified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#039;t have to blast it to bits.  You could simply fly up there with your remote controlled robot and spraypaint its cameras!  Or you could shoot lasers into its cameras, burning them out.</p>
<p>Or you could wrap some wire around its solar panels, shorting them out.</p>
<p>Or you could use tools to cut into it or cut cables or fuel lines, whatever is exposed.  </p>
<p>Or you could zap it with microwaves, frying the electronics inside. </p>
<p>I&#039;m sure the military has thought of every one of these ideas and I bet every one of them is included in the current technology, which of course would be classified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/comment-page-1/#comment-17147</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/#comment-17147</guid>
		<description>&quot;Essel, what do you suggest to kill a satellite? Either way it would send stuff flying across space.&quot;

You grab it and burn a retro rocket.  Or you pack it into a reentry cone if you want to keep the technology.  But honestly how much space junk will remain in orbit for long?  Most of it is too small or to slow (after the collision half of the material is probably knocked out of orbit promptly) to stay around.  The biggest concerns are many sats. that are just left around in high orbits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;Essel, what do you suggest to kill a satellite? Either way it would send stuff flying across space.&#034;</p>
<p>You grab it and burn a retro rocket.  Or you pack it into a reentry cone if you want to keep the technology.  But honestly how much space junk will remain in orbit for long?  Most of it is too small or to slow (after the collision half of the material is probably knocked out of orbit promptly) to stay around.  The biggest concerns are many sats. that are just left around in high orbits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/comment-page-1/#comment-17142</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/#comment-17142</guid>
		<description>About 13 years ago, I came across an interesting ASAT concept on the Raytheon website.  Raytheon included a surprising amount of information for what should have been a rather secretive program, including a lovely artist&#039;s conception.  The page has long since been removed, but there is an infinitesimal chance that I still have a printout of it stuffed away somewhere.  

In any event, the design was for a small satellite with a long &quot;fly swatter&quot; or &quot;tennis racquet&quot; arm.  A fleet of such vehicles would have been parked in various orbits, from which they could be called upon as needed.  

More information on such weapons can be found at the below link:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/ke_asat.htm

*** Please note that details of this account may vary slightly from reality due to more than a decade of bit rot ***</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 13 years ago, I came across an interesting ASAT concept on the Raytheon website.  Raytheon included a surprising amount of information for what should have been a rather secretive program, including a lovely artist&#039;s conception.  The page has long since been removed, but there is an infinitesimal chance that I still have a printout of it stuffed away somewhere.  </p>
<p>In any event, the design was for a small satellite with a long &#034;fly swatter&#034; or &#034;tennis racquet&#034; arm.  A fleet of such vehicles would have been parked in various orbits, from which they could be called upon as needed.  </p>
<p>More information on such weapons can be found at the below link:<br />
<a href="http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/ke_asat.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/ke_asat.htm</a></p>
<p>*** Please note that details of this account may vary slightly from reality due to more than a decade of bit rot ***</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Trenton</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/comment-page-1/#comment-17136</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Trenton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/#comment-17136</guid>
		<description>There is going to be big business in cleaning up space debriss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is going to be big business in cleaning up space debriss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwight</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/comment-page-1/#comment-17133</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/#comment-17133</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s pretty much what they are.  I used to work as a contract manager on ASAT Programs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s pretty much what they are.  I used to work as a contract manager on ASAT Programs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soar</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/comment-page-1/#comment-17132</link>
		<dc:creator>soar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/#comment-17132</guid>
		<description>Essel, what do you suggest to kill a satellite? Either way it would send stuff flying across space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Essel, what do you suggest to kill a satellite? Either way it would send stuff flying across space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Essel</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/comment-page-1/#comment-17122</link>
		<dc:creator>Essel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/#comment-17122</guid>
		<description>The bits and pieces of the satellite as well as the warhead could be strewn across the space; posing more danger to other satellites. This definitely a war technology and not the most elegant civilian way to end a satellite&#039;s life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bits and pieces of the satellite as well as the warhead could be strewn across the space; posing more danger to other satellites. This definitely a war technology and not the most elegant civilian way to end a satellite&#039;s life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/comment-page-1/#comment-17114</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 07:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/so-what-does-an-anti-satellite-weapon-actually-look-like/#comment-17114</guid>
		<description>Somehow I though it would look a lot more complex.
It look like some kind of plumbing device.

Thank you  Ian for another interesting story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow I though it would look a lot more complex.<br />
It look like some kind of plumbing device.</p>
<p>Thank you  Ian for another interesting story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
