<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Astronomers Find the Smallest Black Hole</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/astronomers-find-the-smallest-black-hole/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/astronomers-find-the-smallest-black-hole/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  8 Nov 2009 10:14:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pradipta</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/astronomers-find-the-smallest-black-hole/comment-page-1/#comment-18089</link>
		<dc:creator>pradipta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/astronomers-find-the-smallest-black-hole/#comment-18089</guid>
		<description>From the ancestral time the world space research established on blind theory. We although demand that we have discovered lots of mysteries viz. milk ways, galaxies, nebulas, white drafts, black holes etcs., in real they are creation of space mirror. SPACE MIRROR is the truth and hidden mystery of the space. Since we are unknown about space mirror, our research has diverted from original truth and we have spent lots of time and money behind the false truth.
In short it can not be explain. Therefore it invites to visit http://www.spacemirrormystery.com to know the great truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the ancestral time the world space research established on blind theory. We although demand that we have discovered lots of mysteries viz. milk ways, galaxies, nebulas, white drafts, black holes etcs., in real they are creation of space mirror. SPACE MIRROR is the truth and hidden mystery of the space. Since we are unknown about space mirror, our research has diverted from original truth and we have spent lots of time and money behind the false truth.<br />
In short it can not be explain. Therefore it invites to visit <a href="http://www.spacemirrormystery.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.spacemirrormystery.com</a> to know the great truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Butch</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/astronomers-find-the-smallest-black-hole/comment-page-1/#comment-17342</link>
		<dc:creator>Butch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/astronomers-find-the-smallest-black-hole/#comment-17342</guid>
		<description>Over time Hawking Radiation will reduce the mass of a black hole.  How little mass can a black hole be before it evaporates completely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over time Hawking Radiation will reduce the mass of a black hole.  How little mass can a black hole be before it evaporates completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alokmohan</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/astronomers-find-the-smallest-black-hole/comment-page-1/#comment-17200</link>
		<dc:creator>alokmohan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 05:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/astronomers-find-the-smallest-black-hole/#comment-17200</guid>
		<description>Chandra  limit  of  1.4  solar  mass begets  white  dwarf.1.4  to   3  begets   neutron   stars  .More  than  3    solar  mass begets   black  hole.They  have   experimetally  found   the  lower  limit.Congrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chandra  limit  of  1.4  solar  mass begets  white  dwarf.1.4  to   3  begets   neutron   stars  .More  than  3    solar  mass begets   black  hole.They  have   experimetally  found   the  lower  limit.Congrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrofiend (Syd, Aust)</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/astronomers-find-the-smallest-black-hole/comment-page-1/#comment-17103</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrofiend (Syd, Aust)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/astronomers-find-the-smallest-black-hole/#comment-17103</guid>
		<description># Jacob Gregory Says:
April 1st, 2008 at 2:39 pm 

&quot;I still wonder though how much of a pull would a smaller mass formation like this have on a planet that is much greater then it&#039;s own size and even greater then it&#039;s own mass??&quot;

#  Jordan Lapp Says:
April 1st, 2008 at 3:35 pm

&quot;Even Super Jovian Class planets are smalled than 1 solar mass. It would be impossible to get a planet as large at 3.8 solar masses.&quot;

Exactly. Anything more massive than about 80 times the mass of Jupiter (very roughly 1/12 solar masses) will be able to sustain nuclear fusion in it&#039;s core and become a Red Dwarf star. So a planet, in the sense that we define them, could not become &#039;greater&#039; than the size of this newly discovered black hole.

However, we could imagine this black hole in orbit around our Sun or another star, in which case there would definitely be a significant gravitational effect. In fact, at 3.8 Ms, it would whip our Sun quite significantly, and depending on the separation of the two objects, may accrete matter from it too... It all depends on the relative mass and separation of the black hole and any object it is near. 


&quot;Is there any way to even begin calculating this and would this effect the mass of the black hole in any way??&quot;

There are well defined equations that we can use in such circumstances to calculate such things as the orbital parameters of the system and the particulars of the accretion of mass by the black hole, and the list goes on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># Jacob Gregory Says:<br />
April 1st, 2008 at 2:39 pm </p>
<p>&#034;I still wonder though how much of a pull would a smaller mass formation like this have on a planet that is much greater then it&#039;s own size and even greater then it&#039;s own mass??&#034;</p>
<p>#  Jordan Lapp Says:<br />
April 1st, 2008 at 3:35 pm</p>
<p>&#034;Even Super Jovian Class planets are smalled than 1 solar mass. It would be impossible to get a planet as large at 3.8 solar masses.&#034;</p>
<p>Exactly. Anything more massive than about 80 times the mass of Jupiter (very roughly 1/12 solar masses) will be able to sustain nuclear fusion in it&#039;s core and become a Red Dwarf star. So a planet, in the sense that we define them, could not become &#039;greater&#039; than the size of this newly discovered black hole.</p>
<p>However, we could imagine this black hole in orbit around our Sun or another star, in which case there would definitely be a significant gravitational effect. In fact, at 3.8 Ms, it would whip our Sun quite significantly, and depending on the separation of the two objects, may accrete matter from it too&#8230; It all depends on the relative mass and separation of the black hole and any object it is near. </p>
<p>&#034;Is there any way to even begin calculating this and would this effect the mass of the black hole in any way??&#034;</p>
<p>There are well defined equations that we can use in such circumstances to calculate such things as the orbital parameters of the system and the particulars of the accretion of mass by the black hole, and the list goes on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Lapp</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/astronomers-find-the-smallest-black-hole/comment-page-1/#comment-17090</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Lapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 22:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/astronomers-find-the-smallest-black-hole/#comment-17090</guid>
		<description>Even Super Jovian Class planets are smalled than 1 solar mass. It would be impossible to get a planet as large at 3.8 solar masses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even Super Jovian Class planets are smalled than 1 solar mass. It would be impossible to get a planet as large at 3.8 solar masses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Gregory</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/astronomers-find-the-smallest-black-hole/comment-page-1/#comment-17089</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/01/astronomers-find-the-smallest-black-hole/#comment-17089</guid>
		<description>That is amazing. I Never knew that a black hole of this mass could be found. I still wonder though how much of a pull would a smaller mass formation like this have on a planet that is much greater then it&#039;s own size and even greater then it&#039;s own mass?? Is there any way to even begin calculating this and would this effect the mass of the black hole in any way??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is amazing. I Never knew that a black hole of this mass could be found. I still wonder though how much of a pull would a smaller mass formation like this have on a planet that is much greater then it&#039;s own size and even greater then it&#039;s own mass?? Is there any way to even begin calculating this and would this effect the mass of the black hole in any way??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
