<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mars Gullies Produced by Dry Granular Debris and Not by Recent Water Flow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:17:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How to Get Six Pack Fast</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/comment-page-2/#comment-63471</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Get Six Pack Fast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/#comment-63471</guid>
		<description>Hey, cool tips. Perhaps I&#039;ll buy a bottle of beer to the man from that forum who told me to visit your site :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, cool tips. Perhaps I&#039;ll buy a bottle of beer to the man from that forum who told me to visit your site <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wigs</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-46701</link>
		<dc:creator>Wigs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/#comment-46701</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no water on mars, never was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#039;s no water on mars, never was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wigs</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-22924</link>
		<dc:creator>Wigs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 00:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/#comment-22924</guid>
		<description>I know a couple of people I wouldn&#039;t mind sending on a one way trip to Mars to see if there&#039;s any water on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know a couple of people I wouldn&#039;t mind sending on a one way trip to Mars to see if there&#039;s any water on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeta Connection &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Study: Mars gullies formed by landslides, not water</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-15368</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeta Connection &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Study: Mars gullies formed by landslides, not water</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/#comment-15368</guid>
		<description>[...] Gullies found in 2005 images that appeared to show gully formation created by the rapid release of water have on further examination turned out to be created from the flow of granular debris, or landslides, according to Universe Today. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em;border: 1px black solid">
<p>[...] Gullies found in 2005 images that appeared to show gully formation created by the rapid release of water have on further examination turned out to be created from the flow of granular debris, or landslides, according to Universe Today. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Could Mars Quakes, Seasonal Temperature Changes or a Chance Meteorite Impact Cause Mars Avalanches? &#187; astroengine.com</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-14822</link>
		<dc:creator>Could Mars Quakes, Seasonal Temperature Changes or a Chance Meteorite Impact Cause Mars Avalanches? &#187; astroengine.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 04:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/#comment-14822</guid>
		<description>[...] of Mars. Most recently the HiRISE instrument has been used by University of Arizona researchers to understand the mechanisms behind gully features observed on crater edges. The data from HiRISE supports simulations of liquid water and dry debris [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em;border: 1px black solid">
<p>[...] of Mars. Most recently the HiRISE instrument has been used by University of Arizona researchers to understand the mechanisms behind gully features observed on crater edges. The data from HiRISE supports simulations of liquid water and dry debris [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Lam</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-14748</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Lam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 14:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/#comment-14748</guid>
		<description>Astrofriend&#039;s reference to temperature is most likely correct.  As everyone knows, water is liquid  within a very narrow temperature range. It is true, however, that  there may be  a volcanic hot-spot that could maintain liquid water.  Maybe an early snow-ball comet smacked into Mars near or onto one of the hot-spots.  Scifi?  Maybe not!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Astrofriend&#039;s reference to temperature is most likely correct.  As everyone knows, water is liquid  within a very narrow temperature range. It is true, however, that  there may be  a volcanic hot-spot that could maintain liquid water.  Maybe an early snow-ball comet smacked into Mars near or onto one of the hot-spots.  Scifi?  Maybe not!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GBendt</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-14715</link>
		<dc:creator>GBendt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/#comment-14715</guid>
		<description>The temperature on Mars as well as the atmospheric pressure are too low to allow any liquid water to exist on the martian surface. 
Nevertheless it seems that Mars does not care about our concepts of science. There is stuff flow ingat places and at conditions where we were taught that nothing can flow. Seems there are plenty of facts of which we do not have an idea yet. Within a couple of years from now, we will hopefully know a lot more.

Every computer simulation is based on a set of formulas that are together meant to describe the behaviour of a system. If this description is incomplete because not all aspects of the system were available and considered properly, the simulation may  yield an impressive result, but a wrong one. 


Many people hope that we may find liquid water on Mars. The idea of fresh water seeping from the slopes of a hill on a planet , makes such a planet to become something earthlike and inhabitable, something worth while to conquer. Such an idea is of some help if you struggle for more funds for the  exploration of Mars. 

The result of these exploration may very well be that we will estimate our planet higher than ever. So let us explore that remote, cold dry, airless and most unpleasant place. It will help us.

Not everything that is flowing on Mars must necessarily be water. Perhaps it might make you shiver and turn your inside out once you take a sip of it.


Regards,

GÃ¼nther</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The temperature on Mars as well as the atmospheric pressure are too low to allow any liquid water to exist on the martian surface.<br />
Nevertheless it seems that Mars does not care about our concepts of science. There is stuff flow ingat places and at conditions where we were taught that nothing can flow. Seems there are plenty of facts of which we do not have an idea yet. Within a couple of years from now, we will hopefully know a lot more.</p>
<p>Every computer simulation is based on a set of formulas that are together meant to describe the behaviour of a system. If this description is incomplete because not all aspects of the system were available and considered properly, the simulation may  yield an impressive result, but a wrong one. </p>
<p>Many people hope that we may find liquid water on Mars. The idea of fresh water seeping from the slopes of a hill on a planet , makes such a planet to become something earthlike and inhabitable, something worth while to conquer. Such an idea is of some help if you struggle for more funds for the  exploration of Mars. </p>
<p>The result of these exploration may very well be that we will estimate our planet higher than ever. So let us explore that remote, cold dry, airless and most unpleasant place. It will help us.</p>
<p>Not everything that is flowing on Mars must necessarily be water. Perhaps it might make you shiver and turn your inside out once you take a sip of it.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>GÃ¼nther</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mars Gullies Produced by Dry Granular Debris and Not by Recent Water Flow &#124; Name a Star</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-14681</link>
		<dc:creator>Mars Gullies Produced by Dry Granular Debris and Not by Recent Water Flow &#124; Name a Star</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/#comment-14681</guid>
		<description>[...] is the original: Mars Gullies Produced by Dry Granular Debris and Not by Recent Water Flow    Next Item: We are stardust we are goldenPrevious item: Astronomers discover potentially [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em;border: 1px black solid">
<p>[...] is the original: Mars Gullies Produced by Dry Granular Debris and Not by Recent Water Flow    Next Item: We are stardust we are goldenPrevious item: Astronomers discover potentially [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alphonso Richardson</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-14673</link>
		<dc:creator>Alphonso Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/#comment-14673</guid>
		<description>Oh well, keep looking, they may turn something up. Then again.......................</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh well, keep looking, they may turn something up. Then again&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Roundup: &#8220;It Ain&#8217;t Water On Mars&#8221; and Some Want UK Astronauts, But Others Don&#8217;t &#187; astroengine.com</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-14671</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Roundup: &#8220;It Ain&#8217;t Water On Mars&#8221; and Some Want UK Astronauts, But Others Don&#8217;t &#187; astroengine.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 10:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/#comment-14671</guid>
		<description>[...] This however appears not to be the case. Running simulations, the group found the gullies were most likely formed by dry landslides, not liquid water&#8230; that&#8217;s a bit of a blow for exobiologists and manned settlement [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em;border: 1px black solid">
<p>[...] This however appears not to be the case. Running simulations, the group found the gullies were most likely formed by dry landslides, not liquid water&#8230; that&#039;s a bit of a blow for exobiologists and manned settlement [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Koski</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-14662</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Koski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 02:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/#comment-14662</guid>
		<description>Lets see what the Pnoenix tests arrive at for a conclusion, and what else the MRO will find,probaly just at the poles now in the form of water ice,should be an exciting time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets see what the Pnoenix tests arrive at for a conclusion, and what else the MRO will find,probaly just at the poles now in the form of water ice,should be an exciting time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrofiend</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-14658</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrofiend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/#comment-14658</guid>
		<description>&quot;NeoGuru Says:
March 2nd, 2008 at 11:14 am

Has anybody else noticed that the temperature on Mars is cold enough to freeze CO2? ...&quot;

Yeah, but water has a very high specific heat capacity, which means that it can store a lot of heat energy. Hence, it would take a while for it to freeze solid if it was hot and then suddenly gushed out onto the surface. 

There are a few conceivable scenarios in which warm water could be located not too far from the surface and then expelled, but nobody knows how likely or not they may be. Hence the interest over this result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;NeoGuru Says:<br />
March 2nd, 2008 at 11:14 am</p>
<p>Has anybody else noticed that the temperature on Mars is cold enough to freeze CO2? &#8230;&#034;</p>
<p>Yeah, but water has a very high specific heat capacity, which means that it can store a lot of heat energy. Hence, it would take a while for it to freeze solid if it was hot and then suddenly gushed out onto the surface. </p>
<p>There are a few conceivable scenarios in which warm water could be located not too far from the surface and then expelled, but nobody knows how likely or not they may be. Hence the interest over this result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burzycki.org - Tech and Interesting Facts</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-14651</link>
		<dc:creator>Burzycki.org - Tech and Interesting Facts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/#comment-14651</guid>
		<description>[...] Mars Gullies Produced by Dry Granular Debris and Not by Recent Water Flow    March 01st, 2008 &#124; Category: Astronomy, Contributors    The High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) on board NASA&#039;s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) observed what appeared to be fresh gullies formed by a rapid release of water on the Martian surface in 2006. However, new computer models simulating the creation of gullies on the surface of Mars suggest that they are in fact created by the flow of dry debris (i.e. landslides) and not by the flow of water. A blow for the microbial life hunters and a huge blow for mission planners looking for easy sources of water for manned missionsâ€¦ (moreâ€¦) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em;border: 1px black solid">
<p>[...] Mars Gullies Produced by Dry Granular Debris and Not by Recent Water Flow    March 01st, 2008 | Category: Astronomy, Contributors    The High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) on board NASA&#039;s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) observed what appeared to be fresh gullies formed by a rapid release of water on the Martian surface in 2006. However, new computer models simulating the creation of gullies on the surface of Mars suggest that they are in fact created by the flow of dry debris (i.e. landslides) and not by the flow of water. A blow for the microbial life hunters and a huge blow for mission planners looking for easy sources of water for manned missionsâ€¦ (moreâ€¦) [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog de Astronomia do astroPT &#187; Marte seco</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-14647</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog de Astronomia do astroPT &#187; Marte seco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 19:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/#comment-14647</guid>
		<description>[...] existente sob a superfÃ­cie marciana. Seria verdadeiramente uma descoberta sensacional! No entanto, novas simulaÃ§Ãµes de computador parecem mostrar que afinal esses &#8220;gullies&#8221; podem ser causados por decepcionantes (para [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em;border: 1px black solid">
<p>[...] existente sob a superfÃ­cie marciana. Seria verdadeiramente uma descoberta sensacional! No entanto, novas simulaÃ§Ãµes de computador parecem mostrar que afinal esses &#034;gullies&#034; podem ser causados por decepcionantes (para [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NeoGuru</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-14642</link>
		<dc:creator>NeoGuru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 18:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/#comment-14642</guid>
		<description>Has anybody else noticed that the temperature on Mars is cold enough to freeze CO2? Water is a comfortable solid at those temperatures. What&#039;choo talkin&#039; &#039;bout &quot;water flowing on Mars&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anybody else noticed that the temperature on Mars is cold enough to freeze CO2? Water is a comfortable solid at those temperatures. What&#039;choo talkin&#039; &#039;bout &#034;water flowing on Mars&#034;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrophysician</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-14639</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrophysician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 17:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/#comment-14639</guid>
		<description>However, Terragen has a point.  

&quot;The dry granular case was the winner. I was surprised. I started off thinking we were going to prove it&#039;s liquid water.&quot; - Jon D. Pelletier

Science needs to be objective - the hopes of scientists need to be bracketed before plunging into experiments.  When scientists launch into studies and experiments looking for something specific, they run the chance of ruining it by finding things that aren&#039;t really there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However, Terragen has a point.  </p>
<p>&#034;The dry granular case was the winner. I was surprised. I started off thinking we were going to prove it&#039;s liquid water.&#034; &#8211; Jon D. Pelletier</p>
<p>Science needs to be objective &#8211; the hopes of scientists need to be bracketed before plunging into experiments.  When scientists launch into studies and experiments looking for something specific, they run the chance of ruining it by finding things that aren&#039;t really there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl Towson</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-14638</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl Towson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 17:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/#comment-14638</guid>
		<description>Why do the streaks disappear so rapidly? And why are they mostly found in the shodows of craters at high latituds?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do the streaks disappear so rapidly? And why are they mostly found in the shodows of craters at high latituds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valcanoman</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-14625</link>
		<dc:creator>Valcanoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 08:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/#comment-14625</guid>
		<description>tacitus: you might read the article a little more carefully, no one quoted Richard Hoagland in any of those reports or in the article. Only good solid scientific authors made the remarkable statments, water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tacitus: you might read the article a little more carefully, no one quoted Richard Hoagland in any of those reports or in the article. Only good solid scientific authors made the remarkable statments, water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tacitus</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-14606</link>
		<dc:creator>tacitus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 23:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/#comment-14606</guid>
		<description>Terragen, there is nothing wrong with wishful thinking, as long as it doesn&#039;t get the way of doing the science.  I don&#039;t believe anyone say their had proof of running water on the surface of Mars, it was just one theory that seemed to fit the initial evidence.  There was always a good chance that once more research was done, we would find that it wasn&#039;t water after all.

The only people who look stupid now are cranks like Richard Hoagland who said the streaks confirmed that they were &quot;right all along&quot; in claiming that flowing water would be found on Mars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terragen, there is nothing wrong with wishful thinking, as long as it doesn&#039;t get the way of doing the science.  I don&#039;t believe anyone say their had proof of running water on the surface of Mars, it was just one theory that seemed to fit the initial evidence.  There was always a good chance that once more research was done, we would find that it wasn&#039;t water after all.</p>
<p>The only people who look stupid now are cranks like Richard Hoagland who said the streaks confirmed that they were &#034;right all along&#034; in claiming that flowing water would be found on Mars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Shelef</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-14601</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Shelef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 23:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/#comment-14601</guid>
		<description>The &quot;hunt&quot; for microbial life is not on the surface, but several feet underground, where we know there&#039;s plenty of water.  Even the most optimist of hunters don&#039;t think that surface water can persist or can harbor life.  

If anything, such water is a shortcut to digging and looking for life in the underground water ice or any underground liquid water that can persist under that ice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#034;hunt&#034; for microbial life is not on the surface, but several feet underground, where we know there&#039;s plenty of water.  Even the most optimist of hunters don&#039;t think that surface water can persist or can harbor life.  </p>
<p>If anything, such water is a shortcut to digging and looking for life in the underground water ice or any underground liquid water that can persist under that ice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terragen</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/comment-page-1/#comment-14581</link>
		<dc:creator>Terragen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 16:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/01/mars-gullies-produced-by-dry-granular-debris-and-not-by-recent-water-flow/#comment-14581</guid>
		<description>Just be cause we want to discover something, doesn&#039;t make it true. Ah well, keep hunting, water diviners! Nothing is proved yet, but looks like we all got caught up in wishful thinking... again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just be cause we want to discover something, doesn&#039;t make it true. Ah well, keep hunting, water diviners! Nothing is proved yet, but looks like we all got caught up in wishful thinking&#8230; again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
