<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Development Problems May Delay Mars Science Laboratory Mission Until 2011</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:07:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mars Madness &#171; In Other Words</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/comment-page-1/#comment-16121</link>
		<dc:creator>Mars Madness &#171; In Other Words</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/#comment-16121</guid>
		<description>[...] years that no one expected them to be part of.Â  The MSL was expected to replace them, and indeed, much more money than expected has been budgeted to the MSL, and it was budgeted partly because of the Rover&#8217;s success. NASA&#8217;s over budget Mars [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em;border: 1px black solid">
<p>[...] years that no one expected them to be part of.Â  The MSL was expected to replace them, and indeed, much more money than expected has been budgeted to the MSL, and it was budgeted partly because of the Rover&#039;s success. NASA&#039;s over budget Mars [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Development Problems May Delay Mars Science Laboratory Mission Until 2011 &#124; Name a Star</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/comment-page-1/#comment-14703</link>
		<dc:creator>Development Problems May Delay Mars Science Laboratory Mission Until 2011 &#124; Name a Star</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/#comment-14703</guid>
		<description>[...] the original post here: Development Problems May Delay Mars Science Laboratory Mission Until 2011    Next Item: Massive Stars Need Their Smaller Siblings To GrowPrevious item: NASA and ESA Orbiters [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em;border: 1px black solid">
<p>[...] the original post here: Development Problems May Delay Mars Science Laboratory Mission Until 2011    Next Item: Massive Stars Need Their Smaller Siblings To GrowPrevious item: NASA and ESA Orbiters [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Development Problems May Delay Mars Science Laboratory Mission Until 2011 &#124; Name a Star</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/comment-page-1/#comment-14687</link>
		<dc:creator>Development Problems May Delay Mars Science Laboratory Mission Until 2011 &#124; Name a Star</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/#comment-14687</guid>
		<description>[...] the original post here: Development Problems May Delay Mars Science Laboratory Mission Until 2011    Next Item: Massive Stars Need Their Smaller Siblings To GrowPrevious item: Astronomers discover [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em;border: 1px black solid">
<p>[...] the original post here: Development Problems May Delay Mars Science Laboratory Mission Until 2011    Next Item: Massive Stars Need Their Smaller Siblings To GrowPrevious item: Astronomers discover [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burzycki.org - Tech and Interesting Facts</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/comment-page-1/#comment-14653</link>
		<dc:creator>Burzycki.org - Tech and Interesting Facts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 20:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/#comment-14653</guid>
		<description>[...] Development Problems May Delay Mars Science Laboratory Mission Until 2011    February 28th, 2008 &#124; Category: Astronomy, Contributors    NASA&#039;s over budget Mars Science Laboratory mission, scheduled for a 2009 launch, may be delayed due to problems with the atmospheric re-entry shield design. A new shield will cost up to $30 million, adding to the $1.8 billion price tag, $165 million more than planned. The mission uses innovative landing technologies and is powered by a mini-nuclear reactor, giving it the ability to travel faster and carry a bigger payload over the Martian terrain. This new setback may postpone the launch until 2011. (moreâ€¦) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em;border: 1px black solid">
<p>[...] Development Problems May Delay Mars Science Laboratory Mission Until 2011    February 28th, 2008 | Category: Astronomy, Contributors    NASA&#039;s over budget Mars Science Laboratory mission, scheduled for a 2009 launch, may be delayed due to problems with the atmospheric re-entry shield design. A new shield will cost up to $30 million, adding to the $1.8 billion price tag, $165 million more than planned. The mission uses innovative landing technologies and is powered by a mini-nuclear reactor, giving it the ability to travel faster and carry a bigger payload over the Martian terrain. This new setback may postpone the launch until 2011. (moreâ€¦) [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dhalosius</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/comment-page-1/#comment-14624</link>
		<dc:creator>Dhalosius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 08:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/#comment-14624</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s the money that will possibly cause the delay, but the extra time to design, build and test the new shield. If they can&#039;t use the shield they have now, they better take their time to test (and modify where needed) the new one, otherwise we might loose the 1,8 Billion during reentry. I rather wait two more years in that case...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s the money that will possibly cause the delay, but the extra time to design, build and test the new shield. If they can&#039;t use the shield they have now, they better take their time to test (and modify where needed) the new one, otherwise we might loose the 1,8 Billion during reentry. I rather wait two more years in that case&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Koski</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/comment-page-1/#comment-14554</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Koski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 03:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/#comment-14554</guid>
		<description>Its always going to be  a learning curve,but they&#039;ll solve it a worth while project,it would be nice to get going in 2009,we&#039;re on such a role,maybe congress will loosen their purse strings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its always going to be  a learning curve,but they&#039;ll solve it a worth while project,it would be nice to get going in 2009,we&#039;re on such a role,maybe congress will loosen their purse strings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Roundup: Universe Today Articles (4) &#187; astroengine.com</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/comment-page-1/#comment-14550</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Roundup: Universe Today Articles (4) &#187; astroengine.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 02:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/#comment-14550</guid>
		<description>[...] Development Problems May Delay Mars Science Laboratory Mission Until 2011 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em;border: 1px black solid">
<p>[...] Development Problems May Delay Mars Science Laboratory Mission Until 2011 [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcenhillk</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/comment-page-1/#comment-14516</link>
		<dc:creator>mcenhillk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/#comment-14516</guid>
		<description>Even if the heat shield costs another $100 million because of all of the costs you mention, it would still be worth it so that the $1.8 BILLION mission doesn&#039;t die on reentry. A catastrophic failure means a firework show that no one will ever see and exactly zero science results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if the heat shield costs another $100 million because of all of the costs you mention, it would still be worth it so that the $1.8 BILLION mission doesn&#039;t die on reentry. A catastrophic failure means a firework show that no one will ever see and exactly zero science results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sfwrtr</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/comment-page-1/#comment-14487</link>
		<dc:creator>sfwrtr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/#comment-14487</guid>
		<description>For $30 million, they&#039;ll delay a mission that will continue to cost millions just sitting on ground.  There&#039;s the mission controller, storage costs, continued testing costs, costs for rescheduling.  I hope they aren&#039;t being penny wise and pound fooling here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For $30 million, they&#039;ll delay a mission that will continue to cost millions just sitting on ground.  There&#039;s the mission controller, storage costs, continued testing costs, costs for rescheduling.  I hope they aren&#039;t being penny wise and pound fooling here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Ramirez</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/comment-page-1/#comment-14483</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Ramirez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/#comment-14483</guid>
		<description>LLDiaz:
It wasn&#039;t Stardust that crashed it was Genesis.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genesis_spacecraft

Even so, Genesis crashed because of a faulty &#039;deceleration sensor&#039; not because of the heat shield. It wasn&#039;t a total failure because a lot of the samples were still recovered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LLDiaz:<br />
It wasn&#039;t Stardust that crashed it was Genesis.<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genesis_spacecraft" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genesis_spacecraft</a></p>
<p>Even so, Genesis crashed because of a faulty &#039;deceleration sensor&#039; not because of the heat shield. It wasn&#039;t a total failure because a lot of the samples were still recovered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LLDIAZ</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/comment-page-1/#comment-14473</link>
		<dc:creator>LLDIAZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/#comment-14473</guid>
		<description>didnt the stardust mission crash during reentry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>didnt the stardust mission crash during reentry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrofiend</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/comment-page-1/#comment-14469</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrofiend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 23:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/28/development-problems-may-delay-mars-science-laboratory-mission/#comment-14469</guid>
		<description>Disappointing, but with the incredible run of  success in missions to Mars lately, I guess not totally unexpected...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disappointing, but with the incredible run of  success in missions to Mars lately, I guess not totally unexpected&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
