<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Eclipse Photos, Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/27/your-eclipse-photos-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/27/your-eclipse-photos-part-ii/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:07:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mrG</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/27/your-eclipse-photos-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-14643</link>
		<dc:creator>mrG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 18:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/27/your-eclipse-photos-part-ii/#comment-14643</guid>
		<description>Only slightly off topic, can someone explain to me how you get a digital camera to take a picture through a 4&quot; scope?  I have a Mead 4&quot; and every digital camera I have tried does some funky things to the image as soon as the camera becomes aligned to the eye-piece -- last lunar eclipse I did take a really nice barlow-assisted image, it was a little blurry but caught that diamond shine of a crater in the still-dark area, but I had to basically wave the camera over the eyepiece and snap quickly before the camera-computers &quot;corrected&quot; the view!

Back in the late 80&#039;s friends at the RAS had very expensive rigs using liquid cooled CCD gear for astrophotography and I always thought that a plain digital camera would mean that world would finally open up to my sort of budget, but it&#039;s now 20 years later and I still can&#039;t share what I see through the lens :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only slightly off topic, can someone explain to me how you get a digital camera to take a picture through a 4&#034; scope?  I have a Mead 4&#034; and every digital camera I have tried does some funky things to the image as soon as the camera becomes aligned to the eye-piece &#8212; last lunar eclipse I did take a really nice barlow-assisted image, it was a little blurry but caught that diamond shine of a crater in the still-dark area, but I had to basically wave the camera over the eyepiece and snap quickly before the camera-computers &#034;corrected&#034; the view!</p>
<p>Back in the late 80&#039;s friends at the RAS had very expensive rigs using liquid cooled CCD gear for astrophotography and I always thought that a plain digital camera would mean that world would finally open up to my sort of budget, but it&#039;s now 20 years later and I still can&#039;t share what I see through the lens <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chicago Astronomer Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/27/your-eclipse-photos-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-14482</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicago Astronomer Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/27/your-eclipse-photos-part-ii/#comment-14482</guid>
		<description>Thanks Fraser for including my eclipse montage contribution on one of the coldest eclipse events I ever endured.

Taken thru a 5&quot; refractor and a Canon S3 Powershot attached with adapter.  Attending to visitors at the Adler Planetarium, I would grab an exposure when I could and return to the other scope for direct public observation.

They are all cool and impressive.

Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Fraser for including my eclipse montage contribution on one of the coldest eclipse events I ever endured.</p>
<p>Taken thru a 5&#034; refractor and a Canon S3 Powershot attached with adapter.  Attending to visitors at the Adler Planetarium, I would grab an exposure when I could and return to the other scope for direct public observation.</p>
<p>They are all cool and impressive.</p>
<p>Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcellus</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/27/your-eclipse-photos-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-14440</link>
		<dc:creator>marcellus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/27/your-eclipse-photos-part-ii/#comment-14440</guid>
		<description>Great photos everyone!

I never did believe in Peter Pan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great photos everyone!</p>
<p>I never did believe in Peter Pan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/27/your-eclipse-photos-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-14418</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/27/your-eclipse-photos-part-ii/#comment-14418</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting these, really amazing photographs there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting these, really amazing photographs there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/27/your-eclipse-photos-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-14386</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 00:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/27/your-eclipse-photos-part-ii/#comment-14386</guid>
		<description>Yes...quite an event.  Amazing they got a Earthquake in NE Nevada.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes&#8230;quite an event.  Amazing they got a Earthquake in NE Nevada&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeJiane</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/27/your-eclipse-photos-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-14354</link>
		<dc:creator>LeJiane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/27/your-eclipse-photos-part-ii/#comment-14354</guid>
		<description>To me,these photos are breathtaking! I live in the desert and at night the stars look like you could reach up and grab a handfull. On the 20th, the night was clear,the air was crisp,and what I could see with the naked eye was amazing. I only wish I&#039;d had asked for a telescope for my birthday. But,I was very happy getting an eclipse!

WONDERFUL PHOTOGRAPHS!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me,these photos are breathtaking! I live in the desert and at night the stars look like you could reach up and grab a handfull. On the 20th, the night was clear,the air was crisp,and what I could see with the naked eye was amazing. I only wish I&#039;d had asked for a telescope for my birthday. But,I was very happy getting an eclipse!</p>
<p>WONDERFUL PHOTOGRAPHS!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete M</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/27/your-eclipse-photos-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-14347</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/27/your-eclipse-photos-part-ii/#comment-14347</guid>
		<description>Oh poor logan...a few hugs when you were a baby probably could have saved you.  Please seek help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh poor logan&#8230;a few hugs when you were a baby probably could have saved you.  Please seek help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
