<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Asteroid Passes Close to Earth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  8 Nov 2009 12:39:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-40798</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 06:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/#comment-40798</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand it, I&#039;m a star gazer and I knew instantly when I looked up that that &quot;fuzzy spot&quot; did not belong where I was seeing it. If I had not happened to catch a small article in the paper a few days later about a near earth asteroid I would have convinced myself I was seeing things. How can an asteroid so close it looks like a comet be blown off like it was nothing? It was beautiful, and ignored. I did not happen to note the exact weekend that I saw this, but am amazed that there is not more about the siting, it was as beautiful as the last comet that went by. Where are the pictures?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t understand it, I&#039;m a star gazer and I knew instantly when I looked up that that &#034;fuzzy spot&#034; did not belong where I was seeing it. If I had not happened to catch a small article in the paper a few days later about a near earth asteroid I would have convinced myself I was seeing things. How can an asteroid so close it looks like a comet be blown off like it was nothing? It was beautiful, and ignored. I did not happen to note the exact weekend that I saw this, but am amazed that there is not more about the siting, it was as beautiful as the last comet that went by. Where are the pictures?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-12947</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/#comment-12947</guid>
		<description>Yeah, uh, I doubt that.  The only way the &quot;shooting star&quot; phenomenon can take place is for a rock or other object to be slamming into the atmosphere with intense friction and g-forces.  This asteroid was a third of the distance to the moon away from the planet.  You probably saw a plane, David.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, uh, I doubt that.  The only way the &#034;shooting star&#034; phenomenon can take place is for a rock or other object to be slamming into the atmosphere with intense friction and g-forces.  This asteroid was a third of the distance to the moon away from the planet.  You probably saw a plane, David.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-11914</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 08:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/#comment-11914</guid>
		<description>So this is what I saw?  Around 6PM PST?  Right?  If so, the sun had just about set, and while driving down the 405 w/ no stars out yet, in the Southern sky, I saw a HUGE, slowish moving &quot;shooting star.&quot;  Amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this is what I saw?  Around 6PM PST?  Right?  If so, the sun had just about set, and while driving down the 405 w/ no stars out yet, in the Southern sky, I saw a HUGE, slowish moving &#034;shooting star.&#034;  Amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ute</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-11865</link>
		<dc:creator>Ute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 00:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/#comment-11865</guid>
		<description>http://www.focus.de/wissen/wissenschaft/faszination-wissen_did_16884.html

Is this a piece from TU24? Why in subtropical China Snow and Icestorms happens? Why suddently a meteriod in Antarktis is found? I think, this looks not weathered with the sharp edges!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.focus.de/wissen/wissenschaft/faszination-wissen_did_16884.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.focus.de/wissen/wissenschaft/faszination-wissen_did_16884.html</a></p>
<p>Is this a piece from TU24? Why in subtropical China Snow and Icestorms happens? Why suddently a meteriod in Antarktis is found? I think, this looks not weathered with the sharp edges!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-11858</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/#comment-11858</guid>
		<description>Whoops - Typo.

That should be 77,000 tons of TNT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops &#8211; Typo.</p>
<p>That should be 77,000 tons of TNT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-11856</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 23:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/#comment-11856</guid>
		<description>Just a back of a fag-packet calculation :-
From NEO website - Diameter 8.2 to18 metres - Call it 13m. Relative velocity =13.98 Km/Sec.
Typical rock density = 2.5 tonnes/m^3.
So mass of rock = 3300 tonnes.
That makes the energy on impact around the equavalent of 7700 tons of TNT.
Ouch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a back of a fag-packet calculation :-<br />
From NEO website &#8211; Diameter 8.2 to18 metres &#8211; Call it 13m. Relative velocity =13.98 Km/Sec.<br />
Typical rock density = 2.5 tonnes/m^3.<br />
So mass of rock = 3300 tonnes.<br />
That makes the energy on impact around the equavalent of 7700 tons of TNT.<br />
Ouch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-11507</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/#comment-11507</guid>
		<description>The picture of Dactyl, Ida&#039;s tiny moon, is a tactic the major TV news networks use.  A picture unrelated to the story.  An illustration of this tiny rock would have been better idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The picture of Dactyl, Ida&#039;s tiny moon, is a tactic the major TV news networks use.  A picture unrelated to the story.  An illustration of this tiny rock would have been better idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: giovanni</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-11477</link>
		<dc:creator>giovanni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/#comment-11477</guid>
		<description>the  dangers  that our earth is continually exposed to allien  large rocks highlights  once again the need to be prepared  and to take actions to prevent these cataclysmic  events  yet this asteroid was  able to skim the planet undetected  our  technology should be more directed  i believe towards being prepared and able to take counter action  against  these hazards and less against fighting wars  amongst ourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the  dangers  that our earth is continually exposed to allien  large rocks highlights  once again the need to be prepared  and to take actions to prevent these cataclysmic  events  yet this asteroid was  able to skim the planet undetected  our  technology should be more directed  i believe towards being prepared and able to take counter action  against  these hazards and less against fighting wars  amongst ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RAy mowlam</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-11466</link>
		<dc:creator>RAy mowlam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 13:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/#comment-11466</guid>
		<description>if the meteor that hit peru was 2m and caused a crater 15m wide then this one could have caused a crater up to 100m wide if it had hit... thats a mighty big hole... and we arnt worried???? maybe it would be beter to have only a couple of days warning and get it all over with rather than a few months or years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if the meteor that hit peru was 2m and caused a crater 15m wide then this one could have caused a crater up to 100m wide if it had hit&#8230; thats a mighty big hole&#8230; and we arnt worried???? maybe it would be beter to have only a couple of days warning and get it all over with rather than a few months or years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-11349</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 22:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/#comment-11349</guid>
		<description>Its important to note here that as the search for dangerous asteroids becomes more mature, and the tools and techniques get better, and the power/efficiency of CCD cameras improves: We are find smaller and smaller asteroids. 

I think the record for the smallest found is about 4 Meters wide now. Something that small hits the atmosphere every few years. So its only a matter of time now before our hard working astronomers pick up an incoming &quot;boggie&quot;.

I don&#039;t think people appreciate how much work has gone into the approach and how refined the system has become in these past few years. It will never catch everything, but the process of the hunt, the governance and the credibility of the process used is a great achievement and a credit to all involved.

At least we have a credible process to assist manage the innevitable, the public response to it and the media&#039;s sensationalism of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its important to note here that as the search for dangerous asteroids becomes more mature, and the tools and techniques get better, and the power/efficiency of CCD cameras improves: We are find smaller and smaller asteroids. </p>
<p>I think the record for the smallest found is about 4 Meters wide now. Something that small hits the atmosphere every few years. So its only a matter of time now before our hard working astronomers pick up an incoming &#034;boggie&#034;.</p>
<p>I don&#039;t think people appreciate how much work has gone into the approach and how refined the system has become in these past few years. It will never catch everything, but the process of the hunt, the governance and the credibility of the process used is a great achievement and a credit to all involved.</p>
<p>At least we have a credible process to assist manage the innevitable, the public response to it and the media&#039;s sensationalism of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-11330</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/#comment-11330</guid>
		<description>albiet it was an SUV size, no big deal unless it hit a major city or right off the coast to make a very big wave...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>albiet it was an SUV size, no big deal unless it hit a major city or right off the coast to make a very big wave&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-11329</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/#comment-11329</guid>
		<description>They discovered this 2 Days before it passed less than a 3rd the distance to the moon?  Doesn&#039;t that make anyone&#039;s sphincter pucker just a bit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They discovered this 2 Days before it passed less than a 3rd the distance to the moon?  Doesn&#039;t that make anyone&#039;s sphincter pucker just a bit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-11299</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/#comment-11299</guid>
		<description>I just went out and measured two SUVs. Mine measures 24 ft. and my neighbor&#039;s 26. I would say that SUV is a reasonable term.

In my limited experience, asteroids typically end up being smaller rather than larger, thus I would much rather an author understate with a smaller comparison than sensationalize with the largest.

If you read the entire article, it specifically notes that, contrary to usual thought, scientists are now learning that, given the right circumstances, even the smaller rocks can pose serious threats. I certainly would not call the recent Peruvian impact &quot;not dangerous.&quot; That 13m crater could have just as easily been in the middle of a school building. That was created by a .2m-2m rock .. a very small object.

Thank you to Action for Space for noting the proposed NEO Preparedness Act. This is a very serious issue, especially considering that  scientists are having to adjust that dangerous vs. not dangerous threshhold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just went out and measured two SUVs. Mine measures 24 ft. and my neighbor&#039;s 26. I would say that SUV is a reasonable term.</p>
<p>In my limited experience, asteroids typically end up being smaller rather than larger, thus I would much rather an author understate with a smaller comparison than sensationalize with the largest.</p>
<p>If you read the entire article, it specifically notes that, contrary to usual thought, scientists are now learning that, given the right circumstances, even the smaller rocks can pose serious threats. I certainly would not call the recent Peruvian impact &#034;not dangerous.&#034; That 13m crater could have just as easily been in the middle of a school building. That was created by a .2m-2m rock .. a very small object.</p>
<p>Thank you to Action for Space for noting the proposed NEO Preparedness Act. This is a very serious issue, especially considering that  scientists are having to adjust that dangerous vs. not dangerous threshhold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-11297</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/#comment-11297</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d bet that asteroid gets about 3,000 MPG.  I wish I could go 17,000 MPH!

On a serious note, that is staggeringly close.  Imagine if that thing was maybe twice or three times the size and on target to hit our blue and green rock.  2 days is a very small margin.  I&#039;m sure that&#039;s directly attributed to the fact that it was a relatively small object.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;d bet that asteroid gets about 3,000 MPG.  I wish I could go 17,000 MPH!</p>
<p>On a serious note, that is staggeringly close.  Imagine if that thing was maybe twice or three times the size and on target to hit our blue and green rock.  2 days is a very small margin.  I&#039;m sure that&#039;s directly attributed to the fact that it was a relatively small object.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Atkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-11281</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Atkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/#comment-11281</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Big Ian for catching the error.  It&#039;s been corrected.
Nancy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Big Ian for catching the error.  It&#039;s been corrected.<br />
Nancy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-11280</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/#comment-11280</guid>
		<description>Also, 24 - 45 feet DIA is not an SUV, it is a large truck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, 24 &#8211; 45 feet DIA is not an SUV, it is a large truck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-11279</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 15:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/#comment-11279</guid>
		<description>SUV sized?  What kind of MPG does that thing get?

BTW SUV sized doesnt = dangerous, it = would have been great to see that thing burn up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SUV sized?  What kind of MPG does that thing get?</p>
<p>BTW SUV sized doesnt = dangerous, it = would have been great to see that thing burn up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-11265</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/#comment-11265</guid>
		<description>Interesting story but Feb 4th was Monday not Tuesday

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting story but Feb 4th was Monday not Tuesday</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.actionforspace.com</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-11263</link>
		<dc:creator>www.actionforspace.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 14:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/#comment-11263</guid>
		<description>Asteroids can be devastating. Thats why Rep Rohrabacher has put forth the NEO Preparedness act. I posted the text of the bill as well as links to the committee members in congress who are considering the bill. It is being deliberated in the committee this week!

Be sure to read the bill at my site and contact you legislator (who I have also listed) so that you can weigh in on this important issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asteroids can be devastating. Thats why Rep Rohrabacher has put forth the NEO Preparedness act. I posted the text of the bill as well as links to the committee members in congress who are considering the bill. It is being deliberated in the committee this week!</p>
<p>Be sure to read the bill at my site and contact you legislator (who I have also listed) so that you can weigh in on this important issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ch:ris</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/comment-page-1/#comment-11228</link>
		<dc:creator>ch:ris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02/07/another-asteroid-passes-close-to-earth/#comment-11228</guid>
		<description>1/3 the distance of the moon..
thats what i call close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1/3 the distance of the moon..<br />
thats what i call close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
