<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Environmental Impact of a Return to the Moon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/31/the-environmental-impact-of-a-return-to-the-moon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/31/the-environmental-impact-of-a-return-to-the-moon/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:17:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A. Person</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/31/the-environmental-impact-of-a-return-to-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-14327</link>
		<dc:creator>A. Person</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/31/the-environmental-impact-of-a-return-to-the-moon/#comment-14327</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve done a little research on this and found that the environmental impacts are HUGE! The Constellation Program results in contributions to global warming and impacts the ozone layer. In NASA&#039;s 500 page document they brush this fact aside by saying its only a small impact, but based on the carbon dioxide emissions and the ozone depleting substances (HCFC) used to produce the rocket motors this is not true. The impact is big. the exhaust clouds from the takeoff alone have the potential to kill all plant species and burrowing animals it comes in contact with as well as creating pollution in the water. Look it up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve done a little research on this and found that the environmental impacts are HUGE! The Constellation Program results in contributions to global warming and impacts the ozone layer. In NASA&#039;s 500 page document they brush this fact aside by saying its only a small impact, but based on the carbon dioxide emissions and the ozone depleting substances (HCFC) used to produce the rocket motors this is not true. The impact is big. the exhaust clouds from the takeoff alone have the potential to kill all plant species and burrowing animals it comes in contact with as well as creating pollution in the water. Look it up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RGR</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/31/the-environmental-impact-of-a-return-to-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-10662</link>
		<dc:creator>RGR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 19:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/31/the-environmental-impact-of-a-return-to-the-moon/#comment-10662</guid>
		<description>It would seem a low angle freight launch on atmosphere breathing engines with a rocket unit to achieve orbit would reduce pollution for the bulk of the weight transported aloft.

Personnel carriers, such as a development on Spaceship Two, could taxi the flight crew to the ISS or other junction where they would join the vessel bound further out.

Returning to Earth might involve docking with and riding back in the same spacecraft. B. Rutan proved the lower speed re-entry concept as viable in Spaceship One. This method should avoid the danger of high speed entry of the atmosphere and the need for splash-down with the attendant risks and expenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would seem a low angle freight launch on atmosphere breathing engines with a rocket unit to achieve orbit would reduce pollution for the bulk of the weight transported aloft.</p>
<p>Personnel carriers, such as a development on Spaceship Two, could taxi the flight crew to the ISS or other junction where they would join the vessel bound further out.</p>
<p>Returning to Earth might involve docking with and riding back in the same spacecraft. B. Rutan proved the lower speed re-entry concept as viable in Spaceship One. This method should avoid the danger of high speed entry of the atmosphere and the need for splash-down with the attendant risks and expenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ciencia Kanija &#187; Blog Archive &#187; El impacto ambiental del retorno a la Luna</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/31/the-environmental-impact-of-a-return-to-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-10503</link>
		<dc:creator>Ciencia Kanija &#187; Blog Archive &#187; El impacto ambiental del retorno a la Luna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 17:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/31/the-environmental-impact-of-a-return-to-the-moon/#comment-10503</guid>
		<description>[...] al documento completo de forma on-line. Autor: Fraser Cain Fecha Original: 31 de enero de 2008 Enlace Original Articulos RelacionadosLeyendo la historia del Sistema Solar en granos de polvo de cometaHace cuatro [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em;border: 1px black solid">
<p>[...] al documento completo de forma on-line. Autor: Fraser Cain Fecha Original: 31 de enero de 2008 Enlace Original Articulos RelacionadosLeyendo la historia del Sistema Solar en granos de polvo de cometaHace cuatro [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/31/the-environmental-impact-of-a-return-to-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-10434</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 07:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/31/the-environmental-impact-of-a-return-to-the-moon/#comment-10434</guid>
		<description>I still can&#039;t believe that there are people, who don&#039;t believe that we landed on the moon.  Not to tell my age but I watched the landing on a black and white TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still can&#039;t believe that there are people, who don&#039;t believe that we landed on the moon.  Not to tell my age but I watched the landing on a black and white TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkgilli</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/31/the-environmental-impact-of-a-return-to-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-10333</link>
		<dc:creator>jkgilli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 16:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/31/the-environmental-impact-of-a-return-to-the-moon/#comment-10333</guid>
		<description>May be they want an excuse not to go to the moon......
all I want is someone to do a fly by at least so I can see the junk we left there and then I can believe that we were there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May be they want an excuse not to go to the moon&#8230;&#8230;<br />
all I want is someone to do a fly by at least so I can see the junk we left there and then I can believe that we were there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vagueofgodalming</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/31/the-environmental-impact-of-a-return-to-the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-10311</link>
		<dc:creator>Vagueofgodalming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/31/the-environmental-impact-of-a-return-to-the-moon/#comment-10311</guid>
		<description>Hm.  And it doesn&#039;t even mention that it doesn&#039;t consider carbon dioxide emissions.  I can&#039;t help feeling there&#039;s a lurking scandal there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm.  And it doesn&#039;t even mention that it doesn&#039;t consider carbon dioxide emissions.  I can&#039;t help feeling there&#039;s a lurking scandal there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
