<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Nova Doesn&#039;t Create, It Destroys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/28/a-nova-doesnt-create-it-destroys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/28/a-nova-doesnt-create-it-destroys/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:17:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gozer The Destructor</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/28/a-nova-doesnt-create-it-destroys/comment-page-1/#comment-9737</link>
		<dc:creator>Gozer The Destructor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/28/a-nova-doesnt-create-it-destroys/#comment-9737</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t a nova just compress the dust cloud as the shockwave expanded outwards?  And in turn with the cloud being compressed, shouldn&#039;t it start to form its own gravity well, and start gobbling up more matter on its own?  Therefore creation should still follow destruction...??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#039;t a nova just compress the dust cloud as the shockwave expanded outwards?  And in turn with the cloud being compressed, shouldn&#039;t it start to form its own gravity well, and start gobbling up more matter on its own?  Therefore creation should still follow destruction&#8230;??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Bleeding Obvious</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/28/a-nova-doesnt-create-it-destroys/comment-page-1/#comment-9723</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Bleeding Obvious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/28/a-nova-doesnt-create-it-destroys/#comment-9723</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know where these astronomers came up with &quot;kaboom = creation&quot; or who their parents are but, in my house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t know where these astronomers came up with &#034;kaboom = creation&#034; or who their parents are but, in my house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actionforspace.com</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/28/a-nova-doesnt-create-it-destroys/comment-page-1/#comment-9718</link>
		<dc:creator>actionforspace.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/28/a-nova-doesnt-create-it-destroys/#comment-9718</guid>
		<description>Fascinating! It seems like they discover something totally amazing almost every day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating! It seems like they discover something totally amazing almost every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nova Doesn&#8217;t Create, It Destroys &#171; Newsout&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/28/a-nova-doesnt-create-it-destroys/comment-page-1/#comment-9714</link>
		<dc:creator>Nova Doesn&#8217;t Create, It Destroys &#171; Newsout&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/28/a-nova-doesnt-create-it-destroys/#comment-9714</guid>
		<description>[...] Nova Doesn&#8217;t Create, It&#160;Destroys   Astronomers used to think that brief stellar eruptions called novae generated massive amounts of dust. But new observations of a well known nova system called RS Ophiuchus shows that isn&#8217;t the case. The dust was there already, and a nova blast just clears it all away. (moreâ€¦) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em;border: 1px black solid">
<p>[...] Nova Doesn&#039;t Create, It&nbsp;Destroys   Astronomers used to think that brief stellar eruptions called novae generated massive amounts of dust. But new observations of a well known nova system called RS Ophiuchus shows that isn&#039;t the case. The dust was there already, and a nova blast just clears it all away. (moreâ€¦) [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
