Comments on: Will Time be Replaced by Another Space Dimension?

By: woodrooster

woodrooster — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 04:35:24 +0000

There can be no time without movement.

By: Billy joe

Billy joe — Sat, 13 Sep 2008 21:53:42 +0000

i think this idea is so stupid and scientist are dumb and retarded and they don't know what they're talking about so they need to shut their faces, i mean we should not worry about this stuff because god will tell us when the time is to die.

By: Bryan Brookes-Smith

Bryan Brookes-Smith — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 01:33:28 +0000

Is time really so different to space? Or is it that difference which is an illusion?

Sure matter probably cannot move backward in time, thereby occupying the same time twice, but then no-one has ever demonstrated matter occupying the same space twice either, sure it can happen in principle, but probably in the whole history of the universe never has.

In fact with the universe constantly evolving and apparentally expanding, isn't discreet, absolute space just as much an illusion?

By: ian

ian — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 02:17:01 +0000

looks like a galactic center

By: Antti Roine

Antti Roine — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:47:59 +0000

Time is a mathematical and mental illusion but gravity is the real physical thing. See some arguments from:

http://www.antti-roine.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=30

Time originates from the movement and change.

By: will

will — Tue, 27 May 2008 15:24:32 +0000

as long as there is movement, let there be time

By: JN

JN — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:35:08 +0000

Hi Frend
http://www.hypothesis-of-universe.com/en/index.php?nav=home

By: media underground

media underground — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 06:29:14 +0000

Will Time Be Replaced By Another Space Dimension?…

'What if time disappeared? Yes, it sounds like a silly question – and if the cosmos sticks to the current laws of physics – it's a question we need never ask beyond this article. Writing this article would in itself be a waste of my time if the cosmo…

By: Z

Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:57:56 +0000

Pope X

You are moronic and primitive. (And thats coming from a 15 year old)

Should we find the ability of time travel, make sure you take a trip back to the Renaissance; you have been left behind.

It is not directly your fault, but you have been severely misguided and left narrow-minded. Broaden your horizon.

By: Bob

Bob — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:52:03 +0000

Time is God

By: N Stone

N Stone — Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:28:54 +0000

Time is a concept,

time never stops, we cannot go back in time, and so, the universe and us are just moving around in space endlssly and so, time is the universe and us moving around space. and so,
"time can be seen as just a result of space moving around or space can be seen as a result of time'. either way

By: M Jones

M Jones — Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:25:59 +0000

we are the past

Remeber these words and we can change the future

By: astroengine | Will Time be Replaced by Another Space Dimension?

astroengine | Will Time be Replaced by Another Space Dimension? — Mon, 11 Feb 2008 05:44:48 +0000

[...] the 4-dimensional universe we know and love with superstrings threaded straight throughâ€¦ [more] Posted: January 24th, 2008 under Relativity, Universe Today. Comments: [...]

By: Zephir

Zephir — Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:17:13 +0000

From Aether Wave Theory the concept of time as another space dimension follows easilly and naturaly from concept of Aether density gradient. For example, at the gradient formed by water surface, the time is the direction perpendicular to the water surface, which forms the local space-time for surface wave spreading.

http://superstruny.aspweb.cz/images/fyzika/aether/time_dimension.gif

By: Chuck Lam

Chuck Lam — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:25:29 +0000

To all those linking time and space. Keep in mind both lack substance. To say space is expanding or time is flowing or both are directly connected is only an impression. Yes, I'm familiar with the math! It might be argued that space is measurable in three dimensions for example, but that doesn't quanfify what was measured has substance.. The same for time. Simply watching a clock doesn't prove time exists. It's a mechanism in motion. Refering to both space and time as being somthing is questionable. If we could bottle both, weigh, touch, take it apart for study, actually get our hands on the stuff for study then maybe we could do some serious science. Wacky?Maybe! Maybe not!

By: Chuck Lam

Chuck Lam — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:57:48 +0000

To Jason L. WOW!

By: Universe Today » Large Hadron Collider May Help Us Glimpse Into another Dimension

Tue, 05 Feb 2008 04:24:52 +0000

[...] experience. We are confined to our three dimensions of space and one dimension of time (although this may not always be the case), otherwise known as four dimensional space-time. Elemental vibrating strings thread through our [...]

By: Wayne

Wayne — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:40:45 +0000

This transition will go unnoticed in the normal spacetime continuem as this dissapates it will be replaced by a forever dimensional scale in outerspace and innerspace the mathmatics behind this is unreal we could never understand even in eternity.Lets leave that to YAHWEH. (Afterall he's thd great mathmatician Alfa & Omega.

By: Wayne

Wayne — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 21:22:52 +0000

God will cause this transition of space time bible states that we will live forever KIOS time.

By: Kritikon Commonplace Book » Will Time be Replaced by Another Space Dimension?

Fri, 01 Feb 2008 11:58:02 +0000

[...] What if time disappeared? Yes, it sounds like a silly question – and if the cosmos sticks to the current laws of physics – it's a question we need never ask beyond this article. Writing this article would in itself be a waste of my time if the cosmos was that simple. But I'm hedging my bets and continuing to type, as I believe we have only just scratched the surface of the universal laws of physics; the universe is anything but simple. There may in fact be something to this crazy notion that the nature of the universe could be turned on its head should the fundamental quantity of time be transformed into another dimension of space. An idea like this falls out of the domain of classical thought, and into the realms of "braneworlds", a view that encapsulates the 4-dimensional universe we know and love with superstrings threaded straight through… (more…) [...]

By: Nuno

Nuno — Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:52:11 +0000

There will be space, but no time.
(doesn't this sounds recursively wrong?)

Well people,
Keep on changing!

By: Nuno

Nuno — Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:49:33 +0000

Hell WILL Freeze over!

By: Nuno

Nuno — Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:48:41 +0000

You see: everything will be equal.
Entropy levels will be stable at zero everywhere
Temperature will be zero everywhere.
Right?

By: Nuno

Nuno — Wed, 30 Jan 2008 15:46:03 +0000

People,
I finally got it:
Time is our notion/perception of CHANGE.
Change of "things" in spatial dimensions.
So, the notion of time is disappearing can be viewed as lack of change…
This means that everything will come to a point where no change will be ever possible. "The major Freeze".

By: Jason Leary

Jason Leary — Tue, 29 Jan 2008 23:42:52 +0000

Hi Carrie ,

If there was NO time then there would be no experience or mentation of any sort NOT even for disembodied minds .

It would NOT be like the Matrix because there would be NO travel —not even in thought , if there were no time.

Whenever you have a process with a before and an after to any of the events in that process—then you must have time.

Those people who tell you that you can have a process that has a before and after and still have NO time involved , are guilty of doublespeak and doublethink .