<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Do Asteroids Turn Dangerous?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  8 Nov 2009 05:58:23 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: farjana ahmed</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-20558</link>
		<dc:creator>farjana ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 13:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/#comment-20558</guid>
		<description>i  really like comets</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i  really like comets</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homefire</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-11983</link>
		<dc:creator>Homefire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/#comment-11983</guid>
		<description>Check out this thorough exploration of what happens to small comets in our atmosphere.



http://smallcomets.physics.uiowa.edu/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out this thorough exploration of what happens to small comets in our atmosphere.</p>
<p><a href="http://smallcomets.physics.uiowa.edu/" rel="nofollow">http://smallcomets.physics.uiowa.edu/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sorting Out Science &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Carnival of Space, Week 38 &#8212; The Adventures of Shorty Barlow, Private Eye</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-9251</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorting Out Science &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Carnival of Space, Week 38 &#8212; The Adventures of Shorty Barlow, Private Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 02:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/#comment-9251</guid>
		<description>[...] things like that. Playing up the risks and all, well past the point of reason. Not that you should turn your back on them &#8212; if nothing else, they could come in handy down the road. But then again, maybe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em;border: 1px black solid">
<p>[...] things like that. Playing up the risks and all, well past the point of reason. Not that you should turn your back on them &#8212; if nothing else, they could come in handy down the road. But then again, maybe [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Kamiat</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-9165</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Kamiat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/#comment-9165</guid>
		<description>I recall reading that the Tunguska object was a stony asteroid--determined by microscopic fragments found embedded in the tree bark.  It exploded high up, with energy roughly equivalent to 1,000 Hiroshima bombs.  The thing that put that big hole in the ground near Winslow, Arizona, was about the same size; but it was an iron-nickel asteroid, so it penetrated all the way down instead of exploding in the atmosphere.

So far, I understand the best plan to divert a potential impactor is a gravitational tractor.  That involves putting a spacecraft into the same trajectory as the asteroid, just a short distance from it, and affecting its orbit just enough to make it miss us.

The trick is to find enough funding to have the system all developed, tested, and ready to go when we need it.  Then, assuming a few years&#039; warning, we could divert the thing in time.

Bruce</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall reading that the Tunguska object was a stony asteroid&#8211;determined by microscopic fragments found embedded in the tree bark.  It exploded high up, with energy roughly equivalent to 1,000 Hiroshima bombs.  The thing that put that big hole in the ground near Winslow, Arizona, was about the same size; but it was an iron-nickel asteroid, so it penetrated all the way down instead of exploding in the atmosphere.</p>
<p>So far, I understand the best plan to divert a potential impactor is a gravitational tractor.  That involves putting a spacecraft into the same trajectory as the asteroid, just a short distance from it, and affecting its orbit just enough to make it miss us.</p>
<p>The trick is to find enough funding to have the system all developed, tested, and ready to go when we need it.  Then, assuming a few years&#039; warning, we could divert the thing in time.</p>
<p>Bruce</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Lapp</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-9138</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Lapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/#comment-9138</guid>
		<description>So, basically, comets aren&#039;t tracked because:

A) we can&#039;t track them cause we can&#039;t see them.

B) if we spot one and it&#039;s due to collide with the Earth, then we&#039;re hooped anyways.

Am I right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, basically, comets aren&#039;t tracked because:</p>
<p>A) we can&#039;t track them cause we can&#039;t see them.</p>
<p>B) if we spot one and it&#039;s due to collide with the Earth, then we&#039;re hooped anyways.</p>
<p>Am I right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IMSA12</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-9133</link>
		<dc:creator>IMSA12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/#comment-9133</guid>
		<description>I think we should pretty much give up on the much-ballyhooed notion of blowing these things up if they threaten us earthlings.  It seems to me that doing so would just multiply the effects of a potential earth impact because, instead of one object, we&#039;d create dozens of objects of indeterminate size and orbit(s).  &quot;Nudging&quot; a large object into a different orbit would be the way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we should pretty much give up on the much-ballyhooed notion of blowing these things up if they threaten us earthlings.  It seems to me that doing so would just multiply the effects of a potential earth impact because, instead of one object, we&#039;d create dozens of objects of indeterminate size and orbit(s).  &#034;Nudging&#034; a large object into a different orbit would be the way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duality</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-9098</link>
		<dc:creator>Duality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/#comment-9098</guid>
		<description>My comment is along the lines of Brian&#039;s. The title of the article is &quot;When Do Asteroids Turn Dangerous?&quot;, which I took to mean &quot;How big does an asteroid/comet have to be to survive impact with the atmosphere and remain substantial enough to cause significant damage?&quot; No such lower limit is suggested (I know that speed and make-up are also factors.)  Someone estimated the Tunguska asteroid at a minimum of 65 feet in diameter, which, if correct, means that quite a small object can cause a lot of damage. I would like to have seen a lowest-case dangerous diameter. This would give and idea of the smallest objects we need to be able to track to protect against significant possible loss of life. For instance, could a high speed metallic object with a mere 25 foot diameter cause Tunguska-like damage? What is the smallest object that we are capable of tracking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My comment is along the lines of Brian&#039;s. The title of the article is &#034;When Do Asteroids Turn Dangerous?&#034;, which I took to mean &#034;How big does an asteroid/comet have to be to survive impact with the atmosphere and remain substantial enough to cause significant damage?&#034; No such lower limit is suggested (I know that speed and make-up are also factors.)  Someone estimated the Tunguska asteroid at a minimum of 65 feet in diameter, which, if correct, means that quite a small object can cause a lot of damage. I would like to have seen a lowest-case dangerous diameter. This would give and idea of the smallest objects we need to be able to track to protect against significant possible loss of life. For instance, could a high speed metallic object with a mere 25 foot diameter cause Tunguska-like damage? What is the smallest object that we are capable of tracking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcellus</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-9012</link>
		<dc:creator>marcellus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/#comment-9012</guid>
		<description>I think that the Tunguska event was caused by a &quot;rubble pile asteroid&quot;. That is, it was a loosely formed asteroid that allowed the heat and friction to build up on its Earthward side to cause it to explode five miles above the ground.

Comets, especially long period comets with orbits of 200 years or more, are very large, come through our inner solar system infrequently, and would be almost impossible to stop. 

Asteroids have smaller orbits, can be tracked, and possible scenarioes can be figured out for the intervention of their impacts with Planet Earth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the Tunguska event was caused by a &#034;rubble pile asteroid&#034;. That is, it was a loosely formed asteroid that allowed the heat and friction to build up on its Earthward side to cause it to explode five miles above the ground.</p>
<p>Comets, especially long period comets with orbits of 200 years or more, are very large, come through our inner solar system infrequently, and would be almost impossible to stop. </p>
<p>Asteroids have smaller orbits, can be tracked, and possible scenarioes can be figured out for the intervention of their impacts with Planet Earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Plevin</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-8968</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Plevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/#comment-8968</guid>
		<description>According to a documentary I watched recently, the comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 impact on Jupiter, in 1994, created a fireball which was itself the size of planet Earth...........
More generally - If I understood correctly - it was said that the  existing and potential &#039;community&#039; of asteroids is far better known and more predictable than that of comets. Comets, it seems, can appear at relatively short notice and, as has been previously observed, they do shift a bit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a documentary I watched recently, the comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 impact on Jupiter, in 1994, created a fireball which was itself the size of planet Earth&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..<br />
More generally &#8211; If I understood correctly &#8211; it was said that the  existing and potential &#039;community&#039; of asteroids is far better known and more predictable than that of comets. Comets, it seems, can appear at relatively short notice and, as has been previously observed, they do shift a bit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-8931</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/#comment-8931</guid>
		<description>Adrian is right when he comments about the kinetic energy.  Comets or asteroids, doesn&#039;t matter, if one hits, we are in trouble.  A comet will not burn up in the atmosphere simply because of the speed its travelling at.  A comet travelling at say 20,000km an hour will come through the earths atmosphere in less than 6 seconds, which doesn&#039;t leave much time for burning up.  The scary part is I haven&#039;t heard of a comet travelling this slow :S  So Id 6 say seconds is on the high end estimate :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adrian is right when he comments about the kinetic energy.  Comets or asteroids, doesn&#039;t matter, if one hits, we are in trouble.  A comet will not burn up in the atmosphere simply because of the speed its travelling at.  A comet travelling at say 20,000km an hour will come through the earths atmosphere in less than 6 seconds, which doesn&#039;t leave much time for burning up.  The scary part is I haven&#039;t heard of a comet travelling this slow :S  So Id 6 say seconds is on the high end estimate <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-8928</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/#comment-8928</guid>
		<description>I thought the leading explanation to the Tunguska Event was that it was a comet primarily because (1) there was no impact crater at ground zero and (2) there were no traces of meteorite particles to be found in the area.  At least that&#039;s what Carl Sagan says in &quot;Cosmos.&quot;

As evidenced by the flattened trees and trees that were stripped of their branches in the Tunguska Event, a comet that was big enough to not burn up in the atmosphere could still produce enough destructive energy upon impact to vaporize itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the leading explanation to the Tunguska Event was that it was a comet primarily because (1) there was no impact crater at ground zero and (2) there were no traces of meteorite particles to be found in the area.  At least that&#039;s what Carl Sagan says in &#034;Cosmos.&#034;</p>
<p>As evidenced by the flattened trees and trees that were stripped of their branches in the Tunguska Event, a comet that was big enough to not burn up in the atmosphere could still produce enough destructive energy upon impact to vaporize itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harmon Everett</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-8910</link>
		<dc:creator>Harmon Everett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/#comment-8910</guid>
		<description>In July, 2001, a meteorite exploded over the mountains of Northern Pennsylvania, near Williamsport.  I was working at a summer camp there, and it felt as if all 4 tires on my truck exploded at the same time with a very sharp short BANG! that shook the truck. People over hundreds of square miles reported hearing and feeling a sharp explosion. Another worker at the camp who had worked maintenance in the Air Force reported a large flare and explosion that reminded him of an F-16 exploding in midair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In July, 2001, a meteorite exploded over the mountains of Northern Pennsylvania, near Williamsport.  I was working at a summer camp there, and it felt as if all 4 tires on my truck exploded at the same time with a very sharp short BANG! that shook the truck. People over hundreds of square miles reported hearing and feeling a sharp explosion. Another worker at the camp who had worked maintenance in the Air Force reported a large flare and explosion that reminded him of an F-16 exploding in midair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-8883</link>
		<dc:creator>charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/#comment-8883</guid>
		<description>The problem with comets isn&#039;t that they&#039;re made of ice instead of rock but that they are huge.  Levy Shoemaker comet that hit jupiter was in a bunch of chunks - having broken up already.  Each chunk was huge.  When each chunk hit jupiter, it created a plume about the size of earth and left a dark spot of similar size.  

Comets tend to be less of a problem because they are rarer and every one around tends to be discovered quickly - actually there&#039;s an ongoing contest among observers, amateur and professional to be the first to discover new ones.  A couple of months back, a minor comet 17pHolmes blew a gasket and brightened up by a massive amount, going from virtually invisible in a telescope to being visible to someone without a telescope. The gas ball surrounding the comet grew to bigger than the diameter of the sun and the apparent size of it grew to be bigger than the apparent size of the moon.  What&#039;s more - it&#039;s done that trick in the past.  

When you see a meteor shower like the orionides, perseids etc, remember these are cause by dust particles left along the orbit of a comet.  

Offhand, it would seem that even small tiny chunk of a comet would be potentially dangerous to people were it to wind up arriving here on earth in a populated area.  A substantial chunk could be quite dangerous to civilization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with comets isn&#039;t that they&#039;re made of ice instead of rock but that they are huge.  Levy Shoemaker comet that hit jupiter was in a bunch of chunks &#8211; having broken up already.  Each chunk was huge.  When each chunk hit jupiter, it created a plume about the size of earth and left a dark spot of similar size.  </p>
<p>Comets tend to be less of a problem because they are rarer and every one around tends to be discovered quickly &#8211; actually there&#039;s an ongoing contest among observers, amateur and professional to be the first to discover new ones.  A couple of months back, a minor comet 17pHolmes blew a gasket and brightened up by a massive amount, going from virtually invisible in a telescope to being visible to someone without a telescope. The gas ball surrounding the comet grew to bigger than the diameter of the sun and the apparent size of it grew to be bigger than the apparent size of the moon.  What&#039;s more &#8211; it&#039;s done that trick in the past.  </p>
<p>When you see a meteor shower like the orionides, perseids etc, remember these are cause by dust particles left along the orbit of a comet.  </p>
<p>Offhand, it would seem that even small tiny chunk of a comet would be potentially dangerous to people were it to wind up arriving here on earth in a populated area.  A substantial chunk could be quite dangerous to civilization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev.</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-8880</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/#comment-8880</guid>
		<description>Believe that scientists have yet to confirm &quot;if&quot; Tanguska was an astroid or comet?  But, regardless, of what it was... more importantly what was it made of... that would cause it to explode before stricking the earth?

Years ago I was traveling SR-395 (backside of the Sierra&#039;s) from Reno to Los Angeles at night.  Was mesmerized by a bright streaking light that continued getting bright (knowing full well what it was at the moment)... it continued getting brighter, as it slowed, lighting the night, as if it were day, and finally burned out (pooof)... all went dark!  No explosion, only it was &quot;lights out&quot;... followed by &quot;did you see that?&quot;

So what causes em&#039; to explode, what would a foreign object be made of to create another Tunguska?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe that scientists have yet to confirm &#034;if&#034; Tanguska was an astroid or comet?  But, regardless, of what it was&#8230; more importantly what was it made of&#8230; that would cause it to explode before stricking the earth?</p>
<p>Years ago I was traveling SR-395 (backside of the Sierra&#039;s) from Reno to Los Angeles at night.  Was mesmerized by a bright streaking light that continued getting bright (knowing full well what it was at the moment)&#8230; it continued getting brighter, as it slowed, lighting the night, as if it were day, and finally burned out (pooof)&#8230; all went dark!  No explosion, only it was &#034;lights out&#034;&#8230; followed by &#034;did you see that?&#034;</p>
<p>So what causes em&#039; to explode, what would a foreign object be made of to create another Tunguska?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Flower</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-8874</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Flower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/#comment-8874</guid>
		<description>&#039;Ask&#039; Jupiter if comets are &#039;harmless&#039; - last time it got hit by one - there were some massive explosions...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#039;Ask&#039; Jupiter if comets are &#039;harmless&#039; &#8211; last time it got hit by one &#8211; there were some massive explosions&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom brown</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-8862</link>
		<dc:creator>tom brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/#comment-8862</guid>
		<description>Good point, but frankly I am not really all that keen on finding out whether or not you are right, I would rather leave it to science, speculation and computers. And not die.

I guess that is true that the kinetic energy is what matters, as well. I suppose regardless of whether or not it burns up in the atmosphere that energy is still going to have to go somewhere, no matter what the size of the object.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, but frankly I am not really all that keen on finding out whether or not you are right, I would rather leave it to science, speculation and computers. And not die.</p>
<p>I guess that is true that the kinetic energy is what matters, as well. I suppose regardless of whether or not it burns up in the atmosphere that energy is still going to have to go somewhere, no matter what the size of the object.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-8861</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/#comment-8861</guid>
		<description>Comets are just as dangerous as asteroids. It doesn&#039;t matter if are composed of ice and dust ... the kinetic energy is the one that matters. Is like saying that crashing with your airplane in the ocean is better that concrete ...  A comet will go through  atmosphere in a flash, no time for burning up :) . Also, consider that fact that most comets are big, i mean tens of km across?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comets are just as dangerous as asteroids. It doesn&#039;t matter if are composed of ice and dust &#8230; the kinetic energy is the one that matters. Is like saying that crashing with your airplane in the ocean is better that concrete &#8230;  A comet will go through  atmosphere in a flash, no time for burning up <img src='http://www.universetoday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  . Also, consider that fact that most comets are big, i mean tens of km across?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-8855</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/#comment-8855</guid>
		<description>Ice and dust. But I suppose if it was big enough, it might get through...

Also, what is the critical size needed for an asteriod, meteorite, or comet to be able to get through the atmosphere? If that is known, then any object that might get through the atmosphere can be broken up (with the application of nukes I&#039;d imagine).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ice and dust. But I suppose if it was big enough, it might get through&#8230;</p>
<p>Also, what is the critical size needed for an asteriod, meteorite, or comet to be able to get through the atmosphere? If that is known, then any object that might get through the atmosphere can be broken up (with the application of nukes I&#039;d imagine).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom brown</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-8821</link>
		<dc:creator>tom brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/#comment-8821</guid>
		<description>Aren&#039;t comets composed mainly of ice? I was under the impression that they would just burn up in the atmosphere, but I don&#039;t know whether that is entirely true or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#039;t comets composed mainly of ice? I was under the impression that they would just burn up in the atmosphere, but I don&#039;t know whether that is entirely true or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordan Lapp</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/comment-page-1/#comment-8819</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Lapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/21/when-do-asteroids-turn-dangerous/#comment-8819</guid>
		<description>What about Comets? I mean, don&#039;t they pose as large a threat as asteroids?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Comets? I mean, don&#039;t they pose as large a threat as asteroids?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
