<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Britain Proposes New International Space Station Modules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/17/britain-proposes-new-international-space-station-modules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/17/britain-proposes-new-international-space-station-modules/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun,  8 Nov 2009 08:15:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stephanazs</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/17/britain-proposes-new-international-space-station-modules/comment-page-1/#comment-33339</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanazs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 15:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/17/britain-proposes-new-international-space-station-modules/#comment-33339</guid>
		<description>Interesting facts.I have bookmarked this site. stephanazs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting facts.I have bookmarked this site. stephanazs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kazelalr</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/17/britain-proposes-new-international-space-station-modules/comment-page-1/#comment-10430</link>
		<dc:creator>Kazelalr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 06:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/17/britain-proposes-new-international-space-station-modules/#comment-10430</guid>
		<description>Hi webmaster!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi webmaster!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kazelxvv</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/17/britain-proposes-new-international-space-station-modules/comment-page-1/#comment-10429</link>
		<dc:creator>Kazelxvv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 06:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/17/britain-proposes-new-international-space-station-modules/#comment-10429</guid>
		<description>Hi webmaster!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi webmaster!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/17/britain-proposes-new-international-space-station-modules/comment-page-1/#comment-8959</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/17/britain-proposes-new-international-space-station-modules/#comment-8959</guid>
		<description>The US does have a replacement vehicle in the works so we will not have to rely (very much) on the Russian Soyuz series of rockets and orbiters.  

The project is dubbed Orion, and is a throwback to the Mercury/Gemini/Apollo days with a capsule design rather than a glider.  The Orion will replace the Shuttle and, hopefully, will be the primary platform that will carry humans back to the moon and eventually to Mars.

Last I heard the NASA brains were fighting about whether or not the capsule would contain an airbag system to facilitate landings on solid ground, or if they would strip off that hardware in an effort to save weight and instead splash the capsule down in the ocean in more or less the same way we did in the 60&#039;s and 70&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US does have a replacement vehicle in the works so we will not have to rely (very much) on the Russian Soyuz series of rockets and orbiters.  </p>
<p>The project is dubbed Orion, and is a throwback to the Mercury/Gemini/Apollo days with a capsule design rather than a glider.  The Orion will replace the Shuttle and, hopefully, will be the primary platform that will carry humans back to the moon and eventually to Mars.</p>
<p>Last I heard the NASA brains were fighting about whether or not the capsule would contain an airbag system to facilitate landings on solid ground, or if they would strip off that hardware in an effort to save weight and instead splash the capsule down in the ocean in more or less the same way we did in the 60&#039;s and 70&#039;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/17/britain-proposes-new-international-space-station-modules/comment-page-1/#comment-8567</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/17/britain-proposes-new-international-space-station-modules/#comment-8567</guid>
		<description>Cutting the astronomy budged just to waste more money on the space station? No way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cutting the astronomy budged just to waste more money on the space station? No way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcellus</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/17/britain-proposes-new-international-space-station-modules/comment-page-1/#comment-8325</link>
		<dc:creator>marcellus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/17/britain-proposes-new-international-space-station-modules/#comment-8325</guid>
		<description>I saw on a related story that the Russians are considering building a new space platform because the ISS is supposedly going to be &quot;decommissioned&quot; by 2025, perhaps sooner.

Why in the Universe would we spend all this money, time and effort into something that may only last another 17 years? Surely the ISS could last much longer than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw on a related story that the Russians are considering building a new space platform because the ISS is supposedly going to be &#034;decommissioned&#034; by 2025, perhaps sooner.</p>
<p>Why in the Universe would we spend all this money, time and effort into something that may only last another 17 years? Surely the ISS could last much longer than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aqualung</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/17/britain-proposes-new-international-space-station-modules/comment-page-1/#comment-8308</link>
		<dc:creator>Aqualung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/17/britain-proposes-new-international-space-station-modules/#comment-8308</guid>
		<description>The UK Government will not do this, I guarantee it. They have no interest in promoting manned spaceflight and even less in unmanned exploration.

The &#039;Beagle&#039; project was done by without any government support worth mentioning. But if it had succeded the government would have been there taking all the credit.

I suggest that any country who thinks the UK has got this extension to the ISS sorted needs to be planning to do it themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UK Government will not do this, I guarantee it. They have no interest in promoting manned spaceflight and even less in unmanned exploration.</p>
<p>The &#039;Beagle&#039; project was done by without any government support worth mentioning. But if it had succeded the government would have been there taking all the credit.</p>
<p>I suggest that any country who thinks the UK has got this extension to the ISS sorted needs to be planning to do it themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Fool</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/17/britain-proposes-new-international-space-station-modules/comment-page-1/#comment-8223</link>
		<dc:creator>The Fool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/17/britain-proposes-new-international-space-station-modules/#comment-8223</guid>
		<description>It is a good idea and the ISS needs a design or at least a plan to be able to support more astronauts.  The two billion it would cost would I think be a not too bad price to pay to have the UK finally up in space.

It would also be helpful if we could some more crew transport vehicles in the works so that we don&#039;t have to rely completely on the Russians rockets.

The Fool
newfrontiersblog.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a good idea and the ISS needs a design or at least a plan to be able to support more astronauts.  The two billion it would cost would I think be a not too bad price to pay to have the UK finally up in space.</p>
<p>It would also be helpful if we could some more crew transport vehicles in the works so that we don&#039;t have to rely completely on the Russians rockets.</p>
<p>The Fool<br />
newfrontiersblog.blogspot.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lintott&#8217;s Universe &#187; And the wishful thinking award goes to&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/17/britain-proposes-new-international-space-station-modules/comment-page-1/#comment-8201</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lintott&#8217;s Universe &#187; And the wishful thinking award goes to&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/17/britain-proposes-new-international-space-station-modules/#comment-8201</guid>
		<description>[...] to Universe Today, a group of scientists are proposing two British modules for the International Space Station. The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em;border: 1px black solid">
<p>[...] to Universe Today, a group of scientists are proposing two British modules for the International Space Station. The [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
