<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Dark Matter Might Have Snuffed Out the First Stars</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2007/05/08/how-dark-matter-might-have-snuffed-out-the-first-stars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2007/05/08/how-dark-matter-might-have-snuffed-out-the-first-stars/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:07:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JN</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2007/05/08/how-dark-matter-might-have-snuffed-out-the-first-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-18541</link>
		<dc:creator>JN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 10:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2007/05/08/how-dark-matter-might-have-snuffed-out-the-first-stars/#comment-18541</guid>
		<description>Hi Frend
http://www.hypothesis-of-universe.com/en/index.php?nav=home</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Frend<br />
<a href="http://www.hypothesis-of-universe.com/en/index.php?nav=home" rel="nofollow">http://www.hypothesis-of-universe.com/en/index.php?nav=home</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott P Tozer</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2007/05/08/how-dark-matter-might-have-snuffed-out-the-first-stars/comment-page-1/#comment-14666</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott P Tozer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 04:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2007/05/08/how-dark-matter-might-have-snuffed-out-the-first-stars/#comment-14666</guid>
		<description>Dear Universe Ponderers, 
&quot;With the removal of time, all things become possible.&quot;
 You must pardon me if my science is a tad out of date. ( I am an artist, and an interpreter)
OUR universe has expanded and contracted, being born-&quot;living&quot;-then dying- maybe millions of times. Using a &quot;Wheels within Wheels&quot; perspective, is there anything within our own natural evironment that simulates this kind of activity? 
    In our man-made environment, i can think of one thing: a computer. 
It is turned off- it boots up, circuits are triggered, it gets close to the process of &#039;ALL SYSTEMS GO&#039;- then ---------------------
---------
------
--------ERROR LINE CODE &gt;))88711
system reboot in progress

Now I doubt that a computer will reboot a MILLION times, but it is interesting, i think. 
Perhaps OUR universe represents just one tiny,infinitesimal (sp) component (in a larger 
string of connectivity) , and the process of our universe expanding and collapsing again and again- well, perhaps it is (not unlike) the computer reboot-ing, trying to shake the errant Ghost In The Machine. 

In a grander, macro perspective, perhaps the universe is supposed to open, and stay open ! ( like a link in a set of twinkle lights, the chain needs a curent along every &#039;link&#039; in the chain. ) 

I wonder what &quot;color&quot; or frequency would exist in our universe if it WERE to stay open?

-- Some Random Ponderings From a Lover of Energy, 

Scott p Tozer 

&quot; If science could get past asking the question of HOW our atoms and molecules are attracted and relvolve around each other, keeping our various shapes of things intact, then they might ask the question of WHY. For me, the answer is clear: They&#039;re &#039;dancing&#039; to &#039;music&#039; !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Universe Ponderers,<br />
&#034;With the removal of time, all things become possible.&#034;<br />
 You must pardon me if my science is a tad out of date. ( I am an artist, and an interpreter)<br />
OUR universe has expanded and contracted, being born-&#034;living&#034;-then dying- maybe millions of times. Using a &#034;Wheels within Wheels&#034; perspective, is there anything within our own natural evironment that simulates this kind of activity?<br />
    In our man-made environment, i can think of one thing: a computer.<br />
It is turned off- it boots up, circuits are triggered, it gets close to the process of &#039;ALL SYSTEMS GO&#039;- then &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;ERROR LINE CODE &gt;))88711<br />
system reboot in progress</p>
<p>Now I doubt that a computer will reboot a MILLION times, but it is interesting, i think.<br />
Perhaps OUR universe represents just one tiny,infinitesimal (sp) component (in a larger<br />
string of connectivity) , and the process of our universe expanding and collapsing again and again- well, perhaps it is (not unlike) the computer reboot-ing, trying to shake the errant Ghost In The Machine. </p>
<p>In a grander, macro perspective, perhaps the universe is supposed to open, and stay open ! ( like a link in a set of twinkle lights, the chain needs a curent along every &#039;link&#039; in the chain. ) </p>
<p>I wonder what &#034;color&#034; or frequency would exist in our universe if it WERE to stay open?</p>
<p>&#8211; Some Random Ponderings From a Lover of Energy, </p>
<p>Scott p Tozer </p>
<p>&#034; If science could get past asking the question of HOW our atoms and molecules are attracted and relvolve around each other, keeping our various shapes of things intact, then they might ask the question of WHY. For me, the answer is clear: They&#039;re &#039;dancing&#039; to &#039;music&#039; !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
