<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comet McNaught is Now Visible in the Daytime!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.universetoday.com/2007/01/13/comet-mcnaught-is-now-visible-in-the-daytime/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2007/01/13/comet-mcnaught-is-now-visible-in-the-daytime/</link>
	<description>Space and astronomy news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:07:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Hamby</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2007/01/13/comet-mcnaught-is-now-visible-in-the-daytime/comment-page-1/#comment-44359</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Hamby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 05:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2007/01/13/comet-mcnaught-is-now-visible-in-the-daytime/#comment-44359</guid>
		<description>At my age (78), BMI (46), and circumfrence (51&quot;), my doc says I could implode into a black hole soon. Before that event, I&#039;d like an answer to a question, if you can provide it.

Bright spot.  Oklahoma City, 1500 hrs, Spring 1942, clear sky.  
I could see a persistent, stationary point of light 10-15 degrees east, 5-10 degrees north of the zenith.  
I have always assumed it was Venus, but for its ascension (I think it was too high; and too far east at that time of day).  
Do you have any idea of what could have been bright enough for daytime viewing?  
Do you think it was Venus?  I&#039;d like to know before I go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At my age (78), BMI (46), and circumfrence (51&#034;), my doc says I could implode into a black hole soon. Before that event, I&#039;d like an answer to a question, if you can provide it.</p>
<p>Bright spot.  Oklahoma City, 1500 hrs, Spring 1942, clear sky.<br />
I could see a persistent, stationary point of light 10-15 degrees east, 5-10 degrees north of the zenith.<br />
I have always assumed it was Venus, but for its ascension (I think it was too high; and too far east at that time of day).<br />
Do you have any idea of what could have been bright enough for daytime viewing?<br />
Do you think it was Venus?  I&#039;d like to know before I go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comet McNaught is visible in broad daylight! &#171; Steve&#8217;s Peeves &#38; Affinities</title>
		<link>http://www.universetoday.com/2007/01/13/comet-mcnaught-is-now-visible-in-the-daytime/comment-page-1/#comment-10427</link>
		<dc:creator>Comet McNaught is visible in broad daylight! &#171; Steve&#8217;s Peeves &#38; Affinities</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 06:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.universetoday.com/2007/01/13/comet-mcnaught-is-now-visible-in-the-daytime/#comment-10427</guid>
		<description>[...] seen this remarkable comet, brightest in 30 years, but I have another chance. It will be visible during the day, for a while. It&#8217;s hard to say how long, due to the unpredictable nature of cometary [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 1em;border: 1px black solid">
<p>[...] seen this remarkable comet, brightest in 30 years, but I have another chance. It will be visible during the day, for a while. It&#039;s hard to say how long, due to the unpredictable nature of cometary [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
