Comments on: Did a Cooked Meteorite Seed Life on Earth?

By: daniela

daniela — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 03:59:41 +0000

this thing is sooooo fake dnt youu read the Bible god created the world & every thing around it so diz LIE is not worth of any onez time to read!!!!!!!!!!!!!! =[

By: Dutch

Dutch — Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:32:39 +0000

Delbert Freeman, what kind of comment is that? I suppose you will throw up some sort of “God” or “Intelligent Design” proposition (I’m not going to call those theories, they don’t deserve it), if someone actually cared enough to ask for your opinion. Let me tell you one thing, the Universe is a very big and even stranger place. Shit happens. That includes really improbable shit.

By: Martyn

Martyn — Mon, 12 May 2008 00:09:08 +0000

Delbert Freeman, you know how complex life is on this planet? the mathematical formula involved in creating you..the perfect circumstances occurring for life to take the forms it has today?..i would say the probability of the above taking place is much more favorable than life recurring to the exact specifications as on Earth.

Anyway. it’s much more believable than the bible.

By: Basil

Basil — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 07:03:20 +0000

Are all planets seeded and only a select few allow life to get a toe hold? Where did the seed come from? How did it have amino acids to begin with?
Working our way back, back, back, back to the absolute origin of life itself in any form is all I’m interested in. With so much inorganic in the universe, where did the organic come from!?!?!? It drives me crazy. I guess if I had an answer I’d be famous.

By: Vanamonde

Vanamonde — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:35:34 +0000

Omigawd! That could led to anorexia nervorsa transportis! And think of the electric bill!

By: Billy

Billy — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:00:52 +0000

probably safer to do the transport trick on every other meal (like, dinner) and leave breakfast and lunch alone. A whole new market for ‘weight-gain-free’ food.

By: Vanamonde

Vanamonde — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 14:11:48 +0000

Everyone has seen “The Fly” right? I read somewhere that there is another wicked transporter trick and that would be to have that transporter (by accident or by design), reverse all of your moleculars so you were R-isomer based instead of L-isomer. Then you would eat and eat and not gain an oz. Instead, you would starve to death as your body would not use the L-isomer stuff that all of our life used.

Wicked fiction – and I don’t even think it was Harlen Ellison. I can remember. And thanks, Mus for beating to the animo acid faux pas.

By: Don

Don — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 13:28:56 +0000

My comment is a question. What if right hand chirality had been dominant. Would life have been different (possibly more Republican based)? Seriously, any difference?

By: alphonso richardson

alphonso richardson — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:30:30 +0000

Interesting theory. Just because it sounds incredible, doesn’t mean it’s not true. BUT (and it’s a big ‘But’..), it’ll be interesting to see if he can find a method of exprimentally determining if the theory holds up.
Simulations are one thing, actual evidence is another matter entirely.

By: Max Vondel

Max Vondel — Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:20:04 +0000

Yes it is all a bit sketchy. Breslow maybe a professor of chemistry, but his info on the chirality of meteorite seems to be lacking basic review. A couple of examples 1- Murray CM2 – 7racemic (equal) amino’s 11-non protein amino’s. 2-AH 77306 – racemic. 3-Murchison (Nature230, 105-106 (mar 1971)- racemic, 70 amino’s total, only 8 found in terrestial proteins. He’s trying to turn a small excess into a major force.