Biggest Ever Cosmic Explosion Observed 7.5 Billion Light Years Away

by Ian O'Neill on March 20, 2008

The 19th March gamma ray burst (credit: NASA)
A record-breaking gamma ray burst was observed yesterday (March 19th) by NASA’s Swift satellite. After red-shift observations were analysed, astronomers realized they were looking at an explosion half-way across the Universe, some 7.5 billion light years away. This means that the burst occurred 7.5 billion years ago, when the Universe was only half the age it is now. This shatters the record for the most distant object that can be seen with the naked eye…

Gamma ray bursts (GRBs) are the most powerful explosions observed in the Universe, and the most powerful explosions to occur since the Big Bang. A GRB is generated during the collapse of a massive star into a black hole or neutron star. The physics behind a GRB is highly complex, but the most accepted model is that as a massive star collapses to form a black hole, the in falling material is energetically converted into a blast of high energy radiation. It is thought the burst is highly collimated from the poles of the collapsing star. Any local matter downstream of the burst will be vaporized. This has led to the thought that historic terrestrial extinctions over the last hundreds of millions of years could be down to the Earth being irradiated by gamma radiation from such a blast within the Milky Way. But for now, all GRBs are observed outside our galaxy, out of harms way.

An artists impression of gamma ray burst (credit: Stanford.edu)

This record-breaking GRB was observed by the Swift observatory (launched into Earth orbit in 2004) which surveys the sky for GRBs. Using its Burst Alert Telescope (BAT), the initiation of an event can be relayed to Earth within 20 seconds. Once located, the spacecraft turns all its instruments toward the burst to measure the spectrum of light emitted from the afterglow. This observatory is being used to understand how GRBs are initiated and how the hot gas and dust surrounding the event evolves.

“This burst was a whopper; it blows away every gamma ray burst we’ve seen so far.” – Neil Gehrels, Swift principal investigator, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.

This particular GRB was observed in the constellation of Boötes at 2:12 a.m. (EDT), March 19th. Telescopes on the ground and in space quickly turned to Boötes to analyse the afterglow of the burst. Later in the day, the Very Large Telescope in Chile and the Hobby-Eberly Telescope in Texas measured the burst’s redshift at 0.94. From this measure, scientists were able to pinpoint our distance from the explosion. This red shift corresponds to a distance of 7.5 billion light years, signifying that this huge GRB happened 7.5 billion years ago, over half the distance across the observable universe.

Source: NASA

  • Adam

    Wow!!

  • von Dawson’s Express

    About the time Sir Arthur C Clarke passed away…

  • Tom Swift

    Wow, AC Clarke does 7.5 billion years ago? Amazing!

  • Tom Swift

    errr… died

  • Simon

    Now that’s what I call a f*****g big explosion!!!

  • Debi-Lee Wilkinson

    So what are the coordinates? Why is it that the astronomy post never give us enough information to point our telescope? Many of the objects reported are not visible, or the news item, like the gamma ray burst itself, is neither visible nor still happening, but it could still be fun to look. And in this case, there is something to see. The article did say the constellation Bootes, but it is spans many degrees across the sky.

  • Ed2

    Which direction is the GRB headed? Does 50% of the energy go in one direction and 50% in the other direction? Wha is the estimated size of the blackhole?

  • http://highpowerrocketry.blogspot.com Alex

    “Wha is the estimated size of the blackhole?”

    Who said it was a blackhole?

  • http://www.narrowbandimaging.com/images/grb080319B_crisp.jpg richard crisp
  • Gary

    I told you not to eat Mexican last night.

  • Andy

    But “visible with the naked eye”? Can’t believe that.

  • BobLakewood

    For objects located very far away, I would think that the expansion of space would result in 7.5 Billion LY distance to be different than 7.5 billion years ago. Distance (as stated in Light Years) would be greater than time

  • Mike Cloutier

    Would this be a Population II star from which Pop 1 stars were formed?

  • Allan Michael

    It is great to have access to a site like this. Like most people that visit here regularly I find myself absolutely engrossed in articles like this.

    Thank you for keeping this site operating so well.

    Allan in Nova Scotia.

  • p tanwani

    amazing ! 7.5 billion years ago !

  • Carroll Slemaker

    To BobLakewood:

    The answer is that the distance is not the distance to the object today – that cannot be measured directly. It was the distance at the time the burst occurred.

  • joe

    A lot of you are missing the point. What was the relative angle of thegamma ray burst? How much did it miss us by?

  • Fred Dominguez

    7.5 billion light years away, one half of distance of the universe. In the book of daniel 9:27 : and in the midst of the week he shall cause… In a book titled The witness of the stars by E.W.Bullinger, page 42 the constellation Bootes (the coming one) pictures a man walking rapidly, with a spear in his right hand and a sickle in his left hand. Revelation 14 : 14 – 16. For he cometh to judge the earth, and harvest it…

  • Shawn

    Now I did not realize that Gamma rays were “directed”. I thought it acted as visible light. If we saw it we got hit by Gamma radiation. After 7.5 billion light years I just figured the radiation despersed a bit. Or is there something you scientists aren’t telling us.

  • http://www.jodyroberts.com astrojr1

    So was it the Gamma rays that just got red-shifted enough into the visible spectrum? Or was it a bunch of other light along with the gamma rays that we “saw”, which would also have to be at a higher original wavelength, then get red-shifted themselves into the visible range. I suppose I could go google up the formulas but I’m a simple telescope-builder and rather lousy at math compared to the pros…

    A me-too: how many rems or rads or whatever did the telescopes measure? If you watched it would it have been like getting a chest x-ray? a lot less? So many questions…

Previous post:

Next post: