Comments on: Final Detector in Place at the Large Hadron Collider

By: PANAYIOTIS

PANAYIOTIS — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:40:46 +0000

hi
ineed detector to find water underground fr moore than 400 feet
csn u helpme

By: Ken

Ken — Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:34:23 +0000

I really don’t want to end it all right now. Why is it left to a few mad scientists to decide whether the world goes on or not.
This useless experiment should be stopped in it’s tracks!!

By: StitchExp626

StitchExp626 — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 01:41:16 +0000

Abstract
1. Introduction
Set the scene and problem statement. Introduce structure of thesis, state contributions (3-5).
2. Background
Demonstrate wider appreciation (context). Provide motivation. The problem statement and the motivation state how you want the PhD to be judged – as engineering, scientific method, theory, philosophy, &c.
3. Related Work
Survey and critical assessment. Relation to own work.

4-6. Analysis, design, implementation and interpretation of results
7. Critical assessment of own work
State hypothesis, and demonstrate precision, thoroughness, contribution, and comparison with closest rival.

8. Further Work
9. Summary Conclusions
Restate contribution

Appendix
Bibliography

Ref: http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/c.clack/phd.html

By: StitchExp626

StitchExp626 — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:49:08 +0000

Hi Steven, the best thing that you can do with your knowledge is to begin structuring it together in the form of a Thesis, ad then take it to one of the universities and see whether you can use this material as the basis of a Ph D. If you can then you will have a supervisor to help improve your ideas and then be able to have your thesis published so that you get acknowledged for the work and others get to share your insights. Good luck.

By: Steven Turner

Steven Turner — Sat, 05 Apr 2008 17:58:22 +0000

I donâ€™t know where to start, but I need to start somewhere, thus would you take the time to read this? My name is Steven Turner, and I am a physicist in my own right. I started writing about psychology when I was thirteen years old and continued until I was twenty-two. I had not had a teacher of this, so I did all my examinations alone. When I was about twenty-three, my mind began changing focus towards the way our universe works. Again having no teacher, I had to figure it out alone. I wanted to determine how our atom works. I began testing personal theories about simple mathematical codes that the universe could use. Instead of trying to actually see what was going on in an atom, I tried to establish the only possible code that an atom could operate with. This seemed easier for I had no access to a collider, which I had no idea even existed at the time. I spent roughly three years figuring out a code that worked easily, simply, and well. Once I got this done, I signed up for a few classes at a college in order to slightly test my theories. I took a simple algebra class and a psychology class. I tried to show the math teacher some of my work, but not only did he seem to look at me as lesser than him, but he also seemed completely uninterested with my years of work. I suppose I really cant expect more from a teacher thatâ€™s just wants to teach his class, and pass no judgment, but I attained multitudes of universal information during attendance of the class. During my psychology class, it was as if I were at home, seeing things I had never noticed before. Within a few classes I noticed that the makeup of the mind was tightly comparable to the composure of the atom. I began connecting the known knowledge of psychology, with my theories of what I now call atomics, or universal mathematics. Soon I had begun creating something I would like to introduce to the world of science, as ((Psychological Atomics)). I believe I can explain how our minds follow the exact nature of atomic signatures, signals, transfers, disturbances, equations, and much more. I may not be a professional in the eyes of acknowledged world scientists, but I do have a great deal of heart for this. I believe that the universe is so simple that it may be easy to decipher its mechanisms by comparing everything we see around us. Mathematics is universal and associates with every natural world existence. Instead of just breaking the atom down I went straight for what I like to call the ((Bottom)). After briefly reading into some reports, I found that many call the bottom, the ((God particle)). I am trying to crack the atom code in a mobile home, within a small town of Arizona. I CAN DO IT!! All I need is a little time with professionals that I donâ€™t know how to get in touch with. I have put atomics into algebraic and geometric formats and although I donâ€™t have this code complete, I think I am closer than I should be. I can easily explain why light travels faster than sound, and why we donâ€™t age while traveling at the speed of light. Time measurement is easy to define and calculate with this theory. I can make it complex enough to evade many, or easy enough for a grade school student to understand. I have over five hundred pages of journalism and diagrams to share with the scientific world, and whether or not it can ever be taken seriously, I would like to share it with someone. I am also timid to share it, in possibility that it will be stolen, but we all deserve and share the same knowledge together do we not? It doesnâ€™t matter who figures these things out, it only matters that we do. I believe that I have a good idea of what happened seven steps before the Big Bang. This is all I am comfortable sharing at this point.

Thank you,
Your fellow physicist

By: The 327th Male

The 327th Male — Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:40:12 +0000

Wuggy is off the mark. The world won’t end due to the LHC creating a micro black hole. It will end because the experiment will open up the first “window to the future” that skynet will use to send T1000s back to exterminate us.

By: Kevin

Kevin — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:03:09 +0000

Where would the comedians be without all the doom sayers. Thanks for the laugh.

By: hiro

hiro — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 19:49:13 +0000

I feel the same way as you do, Astrofiend. I wonder when we’ll build a multi-PeV collider.

By: Quadrivium

Quadrivium — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:28:34 +0000

Whoa… slow down Wuggy6x9.
When I said “time to get out the water bong”, I didn’t mean “time to fire up the water bong”!
Your comment was quite entertaining.
Keep up the good work, and watch out for that “new type” of matter you speak of.
It’ll get ya every time.

By: Astrofiend

Astrofiend — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 01:00:40 +0000

What is it about the LHC that brings out all the psychos?

No more Greg Egan for you Wuggy6x9. You have an ‘interesting’ post , but have failed to consider the fact that particles are constantly slamming into Earth’s atmosphere with MANY times the energy that the LHC will be able to muster. Let me just state that again – UHECR particles, or the so-called oh-my-god particles, have been recorded with estimated energies of up to ~3×10^20 eV. That is at least two hundred thousand times more energetic than your 1150 TeV collisions. That the universe hasn’t already condensed into a soup of more exotic particles as you suggest may happen as a result of these UHECRs seems to indicate to me that, from the LHC at least, we have nothing to fear.

On another note:

“Chuck Lam Says:
March 1st, 2008 at 7:12 am

Then what? A new higher powered collider?”

Hell yes! I’m already starting to dream about the next big collider, and the LHC hasn’t even fired up yet!