Large Hadron Collider Could Detect “Unparticles”

by Ian O'Neill on January 23, 2008

Unparticles may have fractal properties.
Understanding the mysterious dark matter in our universe is paramount to cosmologists. Dark matter and dark energy makes up the vast majority of mass in the observable universe. It influences galaxy rotation, galactic clusters and even holds the answer to our universe’s fate. So, it is unsurprising to hear about some outlandish physics behind the possible structure of this concealed mass. A Harvard scientist has now stepped up the plate, publishing his understanding about dark matter, believing the answer may lie in a type of material that has a mass, but doesn’t behave like a particle. “Unparticles” may also be detected by the high energy particle accelerator, the Large Hadron Detector (LHD) at CERN going online in a few weeks time. High energy physics is about to get stranger than it already is…

Dark matter is theorized to take on many forms, including: neutron stars, weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), neutrinos, black holes and massive compact halo objects (MACHOs). It is hard, however, to understand where the majority of mass comes from if you can’t observe it, so much of what we “know” about this dark source of matter and energy will remain theory until we can actually find a way of observing it. Now, we have a chance, not only to observe a form of dark matter, but also to generate it.
A simulation of a LHC collision (credit:CERN)
Professor Howard Georgi, a Harvard University physicist, wants to share his idea that the “missing mass” of the universe may be held in a type of matter that cannot be explained by the current understanding of physics. The revelation came to him when he was researching what can be expected from the future results of LHC experiments. Beginning with quantum mechanics (as one would expect), he focused on the interactions between sub-atomic particles. Using the “Standard Model”, which describes everything we know and understand about matter in our universe (interactions, symmetry, leptons, bosons etc.), Georgi soon came to a dead end. He then side stepped a basic premise of the standard model: the forces that govern particle interactions act differently at different length scales.

I did think I was crazy,” Prof. Georgi on the moment he stumbled on the “unparticle theory”.

This is one of the major failings of the standard model – the unification of the four universal forces: weak force, strong force, electromagnetic force and gravitational force. The standard model unites the first three, but neglects gravity. Gravity simply does not fit. So Georgi took the bold step and calculated what could be generated by the LHC without the help of standard sub-atomic thinking and scale length restrictions.

The unparticle would therefore be “scale invariant”, a property of fractals. Unparticles can interact over any scale lengths without restriction. When viewed, the unparticle will act as a fractal and will look similar over any scale (a characteristic known as self-similarity). Unparticles will also take on any mass, some or all the mass, depending on the scale you are viewing at. Now the implication of mass suddenly becomes interesting to the dark matter hunters out there. Unparticles could be a huge source of dark matter.

As they have mass, unparticles would also possess an “ungravity”. Ungravity should have a strong, short-distance effect on matter in the observable world, and so, may be observed by sufficiently sensitive gravity probes.

Whether unparticles exist or not, exploring the possibility that standard thinking may need to be slightly re-jigged for the extreme world of high energy particle collisions will surely lead to some healthy scientific debate. For now, we wait in anticipation for when the LHC goes online in May this year.

Source: Telegraph.co.uk

  • http://www.astroengine.com Ian O’Neill

    I’m curious, how do you measure an ungraviton? Sounds fun :)

  • Distinguished Colleague

    Considering that LIGO was flooded with ungravitons today, I’d say it’s definitely possible.

  • Distinguished Colleague

    Detecting ungravitons begins here:

    http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=24501

  • Johnny Blues

    Quantum UnMechanics????

  • Allan

    I remember many years ago when the soft drink 7up had an ad campaign in which it was the “Uncola”.

    However, that has since disappeared.

    Spooky!

  • UNdistinguished

    Perhaps finding this undetecable unforce will be hailed as the most unfortunate of discoveries. One hopes the code will be broken and the resilts left unclassified.

  • trinitree88

    It’s unbelievable. Regular Standard Model particles, coated with Unguentine, turn into unparticles. You coat the bottom of your flying saucer with them…and voila!..ungravity. Silent, uninertial …(right angle turns at high velocity)…and away you go to Area 51. This stuff also accelerates to superluminal velocity with no loss of energy…similar to the inflationary period of the early universe. And….the best part, it “knows” when to stop traveling superluminally to just fit the cosmological model that latest in vogue. What more could we ask for? free beer?…pretzels to go with the beer?…wenches to serve it all up?…..unbelievable. pete

  • pit

    IT is only logical that every thing in the universe would have a counter part,Matter – antimatter, Black holes- white holes, but I never thought about the possibility of Ungravity. How does it work again?

  • Mad Hatte

    Unquestionably, it is like your unbirthday. Except for one day of the year, it is always present. Like air, it is taken utterly for granted until it is no longer there.

  • John Mendenhall

    We see plenty of things that are probably black holes. Are there any candidate white holes? I don’t recall any.

  • More Distinguished

    Distinguished Colleague, your article is about an gamma ray burst that was not detected by LIGO last year. There is not a signle mention of ungravitons, or even unparticles. Also I repeat that it was last year this happend, not the day you made that comment.

    Not only that, but thisarticle explains that the effect would be a strong, shortlived reading independent of distance while that article says that absolutely nothing was observed.

    The only somparison between the two articles is that ungravity and this odd gamma ray burst may have been measured on a more sensitive apparatus, but that is far from saying they are in any way related.

  • Pedantic Warrior

    Let’s burn Distinguished Colleague at the stake in front of the Cathedral of Science. Joke or not… and despite the fact that he had nothing to do with the article… he deserves the most severe penalty possible–DEATH!

    We must work together to ensure that science in general and Universe Today are as boring as possible and completely bereft of humor.

    Thank you, More Distinguished. You wilt be nominated for Bishop of the Cathedral.

  • Distinguishified

    Undoubtedly. I believe all the comments supporting unparticle research will, heretofore, remain undisputed.

  • Robin S., MD

    The Unparticle looks strangely like the parasite called Giardia Lamblia. But definitely more fascinating, as one wise Vulcan might say……

  • triuneconcept

    Particles are just combinations of subatomic structures. The structures are simply dynamic electric and magnetic field interactions. Therefore, the unparticle is just a dynamic electric/magnetic field interaction and is capable of being detected and measured.

  • NeoGuru

    Undoubtedly our undoing.

  • unUn

    unTesting

  • fred wetzler

    i am unsure regarding the outcome of an unparticle being untested during dangerous unelectric storms. Using unstandard model data only, ungravity can be factored in with the other forces because of the unrenormalized results of Schroedinger’s experiments with unentangled cats.

    (Unentangled cats do not produce offspring.)

  • http://www.fractal.org Jules Ruis

    For more information about the scale-invariance of fractals see article:
    http://www.fractal.org/fractalary/fractalary.htm

  • nicky nichols

    I am wondering about the interaction between spin-2 unparticles and electrons.

    My speculation is that we will see the amplification of the 5-d / 3-d codimension-2 germ of the Kaluza-Klein graviton tower.

    What will the interaction spin-2 UN and a molecular sized electronic cloud bring? In the brief instance before the molecule is broken up, will a correctly shaped configuration of electrons serve to unfold the hyperdimensional singularity?

    I have also considered multiway interactions such as the three-scale molecular, unparticle, and preon components.

    And thus we may open up the fifth dimension.

Previous post:

Next post: